Integrated vs pre-power

Discuss Integrated vs pre-power at the Amplifiers within the HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Hi, I have just upgraded my amp from the old Nakamichi SR2 receiver to a ...

Go Back   HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum > Audio Components > Amplifiers

Notices

Amplifiers Integrated and Pre/Power Amplifiers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:30 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 7
Reputation: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
therider is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Hi,

I have just upgraded my amp from the old Nakamichi SR2 receiver to a Rotel RA-980BX Integrated (100W pc). I am just a beginner in the hi-fi audio world and the prices of these components are pretty high on my place. Anyway I think this choice is not a bad one for a beginner. Anybody has any comment / review on this amp please post it.




Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 15th December 2006, 09:52 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 46
Reputation: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dr.Bass is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolute Phase View Post
Wait till you hear the combo of the plinius cd-101, m8 & sa-201 or their reference sa-ref amps in bridged mode. Totally awesome.
Ya...but then they dont have an integrated amp equivalent...
We are talking about mid priced budget...where you can afford a decent pre-power vs Good integrated....
Once you move up the chain...then seperates take the lead as you can afford the best of the seperates with those kind of budgets.
The Plinius combo you have mentioned falls into the high-end category, where there is very little scope for compromise.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27th March 2008, 05:36 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 85
Reputation: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Srinath_Murthy is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolute Phase View Post
Wait till you hear the combo of the plinius cd-101, m8 & sa-201 or their reference sa-ref amps in bridged mode. Totally awesome.
I'm curious to know as to which make/model speakers would you recommend with this Plinius combo? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28th March 2008, 09:34 AM
dinyaar's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 746
Reputation: 37
Thanks: 3
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
dinyaar is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by therider View Post
Hi techies,

What are the adv/dis of a pre-power combination over integrated amp? If one is a serious music buf, what he should consider? Also does it have any thing to do with the style of music you hear, like jazz, pop, etc?
Hi therider,
My take on this is different. Advantages of integrated is lower price and convenience of one box solution, pre/ powers will outperform in every other aspect.

Example is a Nad 372 VS Nad C162/272. Latter would be hands down better but at a 50% price increase. Now at that elevated price point u may get an integrated that may outperform it. Same applies to even the Primare I 30 vs the Primare Pre 30/A 30.2.

Am sure the plinius pre/powers are superior to their integrateds too as are the Bryston duo. I also beg to differ on the plinius. I know they are rated sky high but i heard the plinius 9100 in Uk at a dealers with Dyna Contour 1.4 and the sound did not blow me away or any such emotion.In fact when he switched to the primare pre/power(i requested) which was cheaper than the plinius integrated i was pretty impressed(needless to say cdp and cabling being constant)

Now therider this would apply to all music styles. Having said that if u have a sensitive speaker, in a moderately sized room an integrated can satisfy u.

I would conclude by saying a good integrated may outperform a pre/power at the same price point but i would seriously doubt it can outperform pre/powers at twice the price as by then u would not be in the budget pre/power league but better and thats where the seperates start to punch way above the integrateds.
Regards

Last edited by dinyaar; 28th March 2008 at 02:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28th March 2008, 04:09 PM
neo neo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai/Surat
Posts: 263
Reputation: 25
Thanks: 9
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
neo is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

I agree with Dinyaar.
Very recently a friend of mine in Delhi bought the Dynaudio focus 140.
He auditioned them with an oldMcCormack DNA 225, Plinius 9200 integrated, Primare I20 & the Krell 400xi.

The plinius & the Mc just could’nt drive the dyna’s well enough. Though Primare sounded good but it also lost control at above mid volumes.
The krell did the job perfectly for him.

I’ve heard the Plinius & the Krell on various tannoys, which are an easy load as compared to the dyna’s.
The plinius was musical, but the krell drove the same speakers better.

I guess an amp with good dynamic headroom, control, low impedance drive & balance in sound etc is more imp than just a debate on Pre/Power Vs Integrated.

Hearing is believing.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28th March 2008, 06:38 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 572
Reputation: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
ranjeetrain is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohan View Post
Interesting thread. In fact I am considering replacing my ol' NAD 370 with a new integrated! Would welcome suggestions for a 100K budget!
I'd add MF 3.5 to your *must audiotion* list. A little further up and Krell KAV-400xi is a beast. Not a great VFM but yeah, one to watch out for. And the final word, Sudgen master Class. No idea of Plinius, though I hear a lot of good things about them.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28th March 2008, 06:45 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 572
Reputation: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
ranjeetrain is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo View Post
I agree with Dinyaar.
Very recently a friend of mine in Delhi bought the Dynaudio focus 140.
He auditioned them with an oldMcCormack DNA 225, Plinius 9200 integrated, Primare I20 & the Krell 400xi.

The plinius & the Mc just could’nt drive the dyna’s well enough. Though Primare sounded good but it also lost control at above mid volumes.
The krell did the job perfectly for him.

I’ve heard the Plinius & the Krell on various tannoys, which are an easy load as compared to the dyna’s.
The plinius was musical, but the krell drove the same speakers better.

I guess an amp with good dynamic headroom, control, low impedance drive & balance in sound etc is more imp than just a debate on Pre/Power Vs Integrated.

Hearing is believing.
I agree with the above. For loads like DynAudios, you need something like Krell and not Plinius.

But the other side of argument can be "quality vs quantity".

You never know what suits a particular person's ears better
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28th March 2008, 07:03 PM
unleash_me's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 585
Reputation: 22
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
unleash_me is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinyaar View Post
...I would conclude by saying a good integrated may outperform a pre/power at the same price point but i would seriously doubt it can outperform pre/powers at twice the price as by then u would not be in the budget pre/power league but better and thats where the seperates start to punch way above the integrateds.
Regards
Yes! It’s a vicious circle.

You should try politics Dinyaar Its been a while since I came across such a complicated yet smart statement. It took me sometime to comprehend - only to realize that it doesn't conclude at all.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28th March 2008, 09:44 PM
dinyaar's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 746
Reputation: 37
Thanks: 3
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
dinyaar is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Hi,

HAHAHA nice one unleash. May be when the markets dive even more and i have no work at all.
Basically in the last para i was disagreeing with cyrus when he said an integrated can sometimes humble a pre/power costing twice the amount.
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28th March 2008, 11:34 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 572
Reputation: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
ranjeetrain is on a distinguished road
Re: Integrated vs pre-power

Pre-power is the way to go only after a level. At budget level it won;t help matters at all. Integrated under INR 50k will always beat separates at the same price level (cost of pre+power being under 50k).

But if someone were to spend 50k plus per component, separates would be a better idea. But even then, the rule will apply to an extent. Equivalently priced Integrated would be better than the separates.

Last edited by ranjeetrain; 28th March 2008 at 11:35 PM. Reason: Correction
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads for: Integrated vs pre-power
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mains Power supply and Hi-Fi Mohan AV Enhancers & Room Acoustics 2 8th September 2006 12:32 PM


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Copyright © 2006-2008, HiFiVision.com All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64