![]() |
| Discuss Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S at the DVD players & DVD/hard-disk recorders within the HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Originally Posted by illusion Can pioneer read Multisession DVD's ?? Also does it have a ... |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| DVD players & DVD/hard-disk recorders DVD players/recorders and soon available HD-DVD/Blueray players |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Thats a true and true. Pioneer can do both.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Quote:
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Spirovious, the Pioneer, Samsung etc., are all budget DVD Players. You should use a coaxial/optical/HDMi out and allow the AVR to do the DAC and sound decoding.
The Denon players are in a different league with better build for DAC and sound decoding. But they are also, at least, twice as costlier even for the lowest 1740 model. If you want the DVD Player to do DAC and sound decoding, yes, the Denon should be better. But the comparison with budget Pioneer and Samsung players will not be fair as they are different price points. Cheers |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
I am quite confused between the two( Pioneer , Samsung). My requirements are as following:-
MY AVR will do all the sound decodings, so as far as sound is concerned any dvd player with digital optical out is enough for me. I play 99% divx movies mainly documentaries and English movies downloaded from the Internet and I will be playing them through a flash drive or preferably a 250gb hdd ( I intend to buy one later on) so USB 2.0 is a must. DVD-A capability is not much required as I donât have any 5.1 discs ! Now both Samsung and Pioneer have all my above features. So now the face off is more about which DVD Player plays Divx Video best ?? For me that is most important. I have ruled out Phillips has it does not have optical digital out. Help here would be really appreciated. I intend to buy this player within next week max. I am ready to pay the price differential of pioneer if the video quality will be better . |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Quote:
I would not rule out the Philips just because of the lack of Optical outs. In any case, the Coaxials are the best for sound. The Philips is the DivX Ultra certified player here. The Pioneer 410K too is a DivX Ultra certified one, I think. The Samsung 1080 PK is not Divx Ultra certified. However it is DivX certified. Ultra is the benchmark on DivX playability. If that is very important to you, you might want to consider this. If you are looking at using USB drives and connecting that to your DVD, here is something you need to consider. In the Pioneer, if you connect the USB, there is no simple way to go back to your disc. You have to switch off and switch on. I think that is very stupid. At least that is the way I was shown the demo of a Pioneer DVD. The Philips plays very well and has good USB connectivity but it has a very cheap looking remote. By far the Samsung has the best remote of the three. |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Quote:
My amp has one coaxial in and two optical ins. My coaxial in is already occupied by my portable player dock and only the optical ins are free . hence i had to rule out phillips I had already mentioned the fact about how phillips 5956 output quality(Divx Videos) was zilch as compared to Sony NS 76 in this forum somewhere . Now I will repeat the same question here - Does the Phillips 5996 and 5956 use the same Mediatek version Chipset ??. Last edited by illusion; 1st September 2008 at 05:54 PM. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Quote:
Samsung certainly has very good pictures, but if it is the best DivX compatibility you are after then it has to be the Pioneer (if you are ruling out the Philips). |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Generally if you compare the reviews for the Sony NS708 and the Samsung 1080PK the Sony has gotten superior reviews.....even consumer reviews on amazon.com (where the comparable model is the Sony NS700) give the SOny an edge. It is a good player for the budget, but there are some slight issues with image noise. Colour reproduction is excellent and dark scenes and handled well.
I will definitely be upgrading to an Oppo or a Denon as soon as I can afford it. If you've invested in a biggish HDTV, it's worth investing a bit more on a DVD player that can do justice to it. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
Quote:
I think samsung Divx- quality is nothing great . In fact I found LG to be much better. I took a small demo of both and Samsung did not impress me. I have heard a lot about Pioneer , I plan to demo the same soon. Lets c ! |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads for: Samsung DVD-1080PK Vs Pioneer DV-600AV-S
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samsung Full HD | Shawn | Television | 34 | 30th September 2008 03:19 AM |
| Samsung Vs Sony LCD | therider | Television | 23 | 4th September 2008 07:20 PM |
| Bravia or Samsung Series 5 | drackz | Television | 18 | 13th August 2008 06:07 PM |
| samsung hdmi cable | Chacko Koshy | Audio & Video Cables | 6 | 2nd June 2008 10:56 PM |
| Feedback on Pioneer DV LX50. Comparison with Pioneer PD D6 | ishlesh | CD Players | 2 | 16th May 2008 08:34 PM |