Emerald Physics CS 3

Discuss Emerald Physics CS 3 at the Reviews within the HiFiVision.com - Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Finally got to hear the CS 3’s at ARN Systems Listened to the following cd’s. ...

Go Back   HiFiVision.com - Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum > Community Centre > Reviews


Reviews Member's reviews & previews.


Advertise Here

Comment
 
Bookmark and Share Review Tools
Emerald Physics CS 3
Published by square_wave
1st September 2009
Emerald Physics CS 3

Finally got to hear the CS 3’s at ARN Systems

Listened to the following cd’s.
1. Tchaikovsky1812 overture
2. 2L sampler – a few songs
3. McCoy Tyner - New York reunion
4. Stan Getz – Bossas and Ballads
5. Ella and Louis
6. John Coltrane - Soultrane
7. Fleetwood Mac- Rumors
8. Pink Floyd –Wall
9. Dire straits - assorted
10. Grateful dead – Assorted
11. Some assorted test cds.

This room was approximately 18ft x 16ft. From what I hear, if you can have 2ft behind the speakers, that is all you need. The minimum setting in the behringer active unit is 2ft. If you have this and the room is decent sized one, you are done.

Source – Usher cd player.
Cables- some random audio art cables.
Pre- Passive – custom made
Amplication – Symphonic line, Leben cs600, Nad c370

Note :
The symphonic line was the best. Very neutral and colorless sound. The leben came close (slightly different sound). C370 ? well most people can live with this amp too. That is the beauty of this speaker. The quality of the amp will not make day and night difference The speakers will show the difference, but it does so many things right that you will not be too bothered.

Scale – The sound stage is large and realistic. It is like real performers on a stage. Each instrument has a realistic size to it. Western classical thrives. In comparison most boxed speakers can make the size miniature and sound anemic.

Very dynamic – The sound has an “out of the box” dynamic attack. Very realistic and convincing.

No apologies - There is a “no- apologies” speaker. No comments like “ the interconnects are burning in. so the sound can be a bit constricted for a few days, please come next Saturday and it may sound much better” and such. Play the speakers and you just sit and listen. The speaker does so many things right, that you do not want to think of anything else.

Coherency – This is speaker combines the coherency of a single driver full range with the extension and slam of a multi driver speaker. Very convincing job. Hardcore, analytic followers of each genre may be able to nit-pick if you really want to but this is as good as it gets for the money if you want to combine both.

Irritability factor – The speaker removes most the irritables caused by the interaction of the room and thickness inherent with most boxed speakers in less than ideal rooms. This is a super-major plus in my book.

Bass- This is one of the best aspects of the loudspeaker. No thickness or muddiness. Out of the box and well defined and clean with lot of detail. Very balanced and convincing. For medium sized room, the CS-3 is all you need.

I was able to enjoy all genres of music, none scoring above the other. With most music, it was some of the most impressive renditions I have heard. Classical, choral, female vocals, rock, jazz……. all sounded just fine.

An audiophile told me recently, “if there is just 10 percent improvement in sound, it gets lost in time. If there is more than 30 percent, you remember it always”. This is one of those speakers which does more than the 30 percent. Very impressive.
Published by
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,650
square_wave has a spectacular aura aboutsquare_wave has a spectacular aura aboutsquare_wave has a spectacular aura about

Member rating
Rate This review
100%100%100%
5
3 users rated 100% average
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to square_wave For This Useful Post:
Sponsored Links
  #1  
By suri on 1st September 2009, 10:48 AM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

hi square _wave,

did you hear the cannons in 1812?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
By square_wave on 1st September 2009, 11:09 AM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by suri View Post
hi square _wave,

did you hear the cannons in 1812?
Yup Very clean and impressive !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
By Asit on 1st September 2009, 12:29 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Hi square_wave,

Thanks for a very compact and useful review. A few questions:

1) Is this the 2-way speaker that does not need bi-amping?

2) How are vocals?

3) Any ballpark price points?

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
By square_wave on 1st September 2009, 12:31 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asit View Post
Hi square_wave,

Thanks for a very compact and useful review. A few questions:

1) Is this the 2-way speaker that does not need bi-amping?

2) How are vocals?

3) Any ballpark price points?

Regards.
Asit.
Yes. It is the 2-way.
Vocals sound clean and un-colored. Very vivid imaging of the singer.
Pricing is around 2 lakh depending on the finish.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
By rastaman on 1st September 2009, 02:15 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Hi square_wave,

I'm on the search for something similar and from the thread http://www.hifivision.com/speakers/5...er-fostex.html EP CS2.3 was recommended. How different is the EP CS3 from the EP CS2.3 and also did you listen to the EP CS2.3 and how would you rate its performance?

I will be making a trip down to Bangalore in a month to audition them for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
By odyssey on 1st September 2009, 02:24 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Hi Rastaman
SW did not hear the CS2.3. In the room that he mentioned, the CS2.3 is a bit of an overkill, it does work though and there is no problem provided the speakers have a gap of at least 3 ft from the backwall (which is usually not a problem given the thickness of these speakers). The main difference between the two speakers is the bass impact/weight on the CS2.3 vs the CS3. On the CS2.3 it goes far deeper and louder (on a HT, you will not need a sub). The bass performance on the CS3 as SW described is very very realistic with a lot of bass definition and detail, not room reverb (which is commonly mistaken for bass) and overhang. The CS2.3 needs to be biamped vs the CS3 which requires a single amp. This gives you the advantage to have a different amp (say tube) on the mids/highs and a solid state for the bass. Both speakers are of enough high sensitivity that a low powered tube amp can be used.

cheers
Sridhar@arnsystems.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
By unleash_me on 1st September 2009, 02:59 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3



Ooh..me likey!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
By suri on 1st September 2009, 04:00 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by odyssey View Post
Hi Rastaman
This gives you the advantage to have a different amp (say tube) on the mids/highs and a solid state for the bass.
now,why would anybody want to do that?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
By odyssey on 1st September 2009, 04:02 PM
Re: Emerald Physics CS 3

hope that isnt a serious question
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks

Review Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads for: Emerald Physics CS 3
Review Review Starter Category Comments Last Post
Review of Emerald Physics CS3 - Imaging King !! odyssey Press Release 3 27th February 2010 11:38 AM
Emerald Physics @ ARN systems sachi Speakers 2 31st December 2008 10:20 AM
Great review of the Emerald Physics CS2 odyssey Speakers 3 16th November 2008 03:30 AM



Advertise Here


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Copyright © 2006-2012, HiFiVision.com All Rights Reserved.

Recommended Websites - www.HiFiMART.com