viewing distance

Discuss viewing distance at the Television within the HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Hi I am bit confused. Everywhere I see that magazines mention 32" for a 8' ...

Go Back   HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum > Video Components > Television


Television CRT, Rear Projection, Plasma, LCD/LED


Advertise Here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 14th August 2008, 12:50 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 41
Reputation: 11
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
vashok is on a distinguished road
viewing distance


Hi
I am bit confused. Everywhere I see that magazines mention 32" for a 8' viewing distance. In my room, I have two seating places. The larger sofa is about 8.5" and the smaller is at about 6.5". I find 32" will make it big for my eyes. Would it not get tiring to look at a big screen so close. Fats moving pictures will tire the eyes ? Why is that the literature does not talk about it rather suggest something like 27" for a 8' viewing distance ?

Thanks,
Ashok
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 14th August 2008, 01:14 PM
Anil kumar's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 435
Reputation: 71
Thanks: 9
Thanked 54 Times in 49 Posts
Anil kumar will become famous soon enough
Re: viewing distance

Hi Ashok, this link might be useful. Check this out.

Home Theater Calculator: Viewing Distance, Screen Size

Home Theater Calculator: Viewing Distance, Screen Size ? CarltonBale.com


Quote:
Originally Posted by vashok View Post
Hi
I am bit confused. Everywhere I see that magazines mention 32" for a 8' viewing distance. In my room, I have two seating places. The larger sofa is about 8.5" and the smaller is at about 6.5". I find 32" will make it big for my eyes. Would it not get tiring to look at a big screen so close. Fats moving pictures will tire the eyes ? Why is that the literature does not talk about it rather suggest something like 27" for a 8' viewing distance ?

Thanks,
Ashok
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Anil kumar For This Useful Post:
psychotropic (5th September 2008), vashok (6th September 2008)
  #3  
Old 5th September 2008, 01:31 PM
psychotropic's Avatar
Donor Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 2,150
Reputation: 295
Thanks: 257
Thanked 283 Times in 242 Posts
psychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the rough
Re: viewing distance

thanks dude, this is a good guide......and it turns out the distance i've placed my 42" plasma at is near-ideal from a acuity of vision perspective.....although many people told me it's too short......it's 7-1/2 feet....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th September 2008, 03:50 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore / Delhi
Posts: 550
Reputation: 68
Thanks: 3
Thanked 57 Times in 51 Posts
mridulgoel will become famous soon enough
Smile Re: viewing distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychotropic View Post
thanks dude, this is a good guide......and it turns out the distance i've placed my 42" plasma at is near-ideal from a acuity of vision perspective.....although many people told me it's too short......it's 7-1/2 feet....
Buddy...

Dont your eyes get irritation, after viewing 42" Screen from a me're 7.5 fts...???

Ashok...
8 fts is the recommendation for 32"...as 11.5 fts is for 42"..generally...
Rest all depends on your comfort...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th September 2008, 04:09 PM
psychotropic's Avatar
Donor Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 2,150
Reputation: 295
Thanks: 257
Thanked 283 Times in 242 Posts
psychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the rough
Re: viewing distance

hey mridul.....actually they don't....it feels perfect....the picture is completely immersive and large......but there's no strain whatsoever.....i did hear about the 8 feet for 32, 10-12 feet for 42 numbers......but this table seems to suggest otherwise, and it seems like a fairly scientific calculation....anyone else with any other views??

venkat? especially since you were the person from whom i first heard of the concept of acuity of vision....and the 7'7" distance suggested on the table for my 1366*768 resolution 42" screen is based on this principle.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by mridulgoel View Post
Buddy...

Dont your eyes get irritation, after viewing 42" Screen from a me're 7.5 fts...???

Ashok...
8 fts is the recommendation for 32"...as 11.5 fts is for 42"..generally...
Rest all depends on your comfort...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th September 2008, 04:15 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore / Delhi
Posts: 550
Reputation: 68
Thanks: 3
Thanked 57 Times in 51 Posts
mridulgoel will become famous soon enough
Smile Re: viewing distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychotropic View Post
hey mridul.....actually they don't....it feels perfect....the picture is completely immersive and large......but there's no strain whatsoever.....i did hear about the 8 feet for 32, 10-12 feet for 42 numbers......but this table seems to suggest otherwise, and it seems like a fairly scientific calculation....anyone else with any other views??

venkat? especially since you were the person from whom i first heard of the concept of acuity of vision....and the 7'7" distance suggested on the table for my 1366*768 resolution 42" screen is based on this principle.....
See there lies the difference...

You are comfortable with 42" @ a difference of just 7.7 fts...

And Ashok feels that 32" @ a distance of 8 fts is too close...
So again its a personal call based on individual comforts...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th September 2008, 04:27 PM
psychotropic's Avatar
Donor Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 2,150
Reputation: 295
Thanks: 257
Thanked 283 Times in 242 Posts
psychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the rough
Re: viewing distance

he he yes.......for me a large and immersive picture was a priority, which is why i put in the extra cash over a 32" LCD and bought a 42" plasma instead....i think it was a completely worthwhile budget-stretch as I really like the picture on the plasmas, when compared to the LCDs that I've tried out....

Quote:
Originally Posted by mridulgoel View Post
See there lies the difference...

You are comfortable with 42" @ a difference of just 7.7 fts...

And Ashok feels that 32" @ a distance of 8 fts is too close...
So again its a personal call based on individual comforts...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th September 2008, 07:32 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 3,593
Reputation: 1328
Thanks: 30
Thanked 1,312 Times in 810 Posts
venkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud ofvenkatcr has much to be proud of
Re: viewing distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychotropic View Post
venkat? especially since you were the person from whom i first heard of the concept of acuity of vision....and the 7'7" distance suggested on the table for my 1366*768 resolution 42" screen is based on this principle.....
Psychotropic, the calculator is quite detailed and follows the SMPTE and the HDTV recommendations.

There is also a simple rule of thumb called 2 to 5. This says that your minimum viewing distance must be 2 times the WIDTH of the screen, and the maximum viewing distance must be 5 times the WIDTH. The ideal will be somewhere between 2.5 to 3 times the WIDTH.

If you sit closer than 2 the width, you will start seeing pixel breakup and if you move more than 5 times away, you will not be able to resolve the pictures and colours properly.

Within these minimum and maximum lengths, you should find your perfect distance. This becomes important to place the surround speakers also.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to venkatcr For This Useful Post:
aki (25th October 2009), goyal.sanchit (15th November 2009), hubballi (13th March 2010), kneo (13th July 2009), mridulgoel (6th September 2008), MumbaiProperties (11th November 2009)
  #9  
Old 6th September 2008, 01:20 PM
psychotropic's Avatar
Donor Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 2,150
Reputation: 295
Thanks: 257
Thanked 283 Times in 242 Posts
psychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the roughpsychotropic is a jewel in the rough
Re: viewing distance

Great....so 2 times 42 inches is 84 inches which is 7 feet....so my 7 and a half feet sounds perfect to achieve a big and immersive picture without sacrificing on the resolution.... i'm really enjoying the pictures btw, especially on DVDs which have good transfers (like Babel and Letters from Iwo Jima)

Quote:
Originally Posted by venkatcr View Post
Psychotropic, the calculator is quite detailed and follows the SMPTE and the HDTV recommendations.

There is also a simple rule of thumb called 2 to 5. This says that your minimum viewing distance must be 2 times the WIDTH of the screen, and the maximum viewing distance must be 5 times the WIDTH. The ideal will be somewhere between 2.5 to 3 times the WIDTH.

If you sit closer than 2 the width, you will start seeing pixel breakup and if you move more than 5 times away, you will not be able to resolve the pictures and colours properly.

Within these minimum and maximum lengths, you should find your perfect distance. This becomes important to place the surround speakers also.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th September 2008, 01:33 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore / Delhi
Posts: 550
Reputation: 68
Thanks: 3
Thanked 57 Times in 51 Posts
mridulgoel will become famous soon enough
Smile Re: viewing distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by venkatcr View Post
Psychotropic, the calculator is quite detailed and follows the SMPTE and the HDTV recommendations.

There is also a simple rule of thumb called 2 to 5. This says that your minimum viewing distance must be 2 times the WIDTH of the screen, and the maximum viewing distance must be 5 times the WIDTH. The ideal will be somewhere between 2.5 to 3 times the WIDTH.

If you sit closer than 2 the width, you will start seeing pixel breakup and if you move more than 5 times away, you will not be able to resolve the pictures and colours properly.

Within these minimum and maximum lengths, you should find your perfect distance. This becomes important to place the surround speakers also.

Cheers
Hey..Venkat

Thanks for the simple calculation....

It really works...
But i think even being 2 times width will be too close...

I think 3 times will be much better...

Anyways...thnx... for the calculation...


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads for: viewing distance
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCD/Plasma mainly for Cable TV viewing akshaye Television 21 21st June 2009 11:21 PM
Viewing and editing HD videos sud98 General Chit Chat 0 8th February 2009 01:35 PM
Cable distance setttings pradski Audio & Video Cables 7 26th December 2008 08:15 PM
pdf download for offline viewing kaushik Your Feedback & Suggestions 0 6th November 2008 08:34 AM
Viewing Forum on Handhelds Nikhil Your Feedback & Suggestions 3 2nd October 2008 08:57 AM



Advertise Here


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Copyright © 2006-2010, HiFiVision.com All Rights Reserved.

Recommended Websites - www.CameraVision.in