![]() |
| Discuss Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5 at the Television within the HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Greetings to all fellow members. I am about to purchase a 32" LCD tv and ... |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Television CRT, Rear Projection, Plasma, LCD/LED |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Greetings to all fellow members.
I am about to purchase a 32" LCD tv and have been looking at various options. I have looked at LG Scarlet/Jazz, Sony Bravia V Series , Samsung Series 4,5. I had almost finalized Samsung Series 5 when I came across Panasonic Viera series. The Panasonic shop owner seemed to be very knowledgable and gave me some insights into HD Ready vs full HD, IPS, 100 Hz refresh etc. He also claimed that he can challenge a Sony Bravia to display as clear and consistent image for regular Sat TV broadcast (Tata Sky) as a Panasonic does. The tv looks good. It costs 44K (Pune) vs Samsung series 5 (Full HD) 44K. Advice need pls!! |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Quote:
I would strongly advise you to buy 32LX700, which will anyday beat Samsung 4 and 5 series just for the SD picture quality. Sound from LX700 is also brilliant, you need to hear the SRS tru-surround it has, you won't be needing a HT setup, its that good. It's also feature rich. Now, LX800, the downfall is the sound, its terrible, doesn't have the SRS effect that 700 has, and it sounds very ordinary. Apart from that, there is 10,000:1 contrast ratio and the panel is different, glossy finish, as the only difference. DVD pictures in both models are just brilliant. After having a demo of SD pictures of Tata Sky in both 700 and 800 side by side, am just 1 week closer to buying 32LX700 ![]() Please have a demo of 800 and 700 and samsung before taking the plunge.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I m also in same situation,Pan800 or Sam 5 for 32 in only. As per your review I wld like to ask,is the newer model realy Bad? I meen less features?Bad SD? I think contrast ratio is improved. What abt Black level in 700 & 800? What's Responsetime or moving object performance? Backlight control (present in 800)? I could only see800 not 700 hence asking you so many Q? Last edited by spirovious; 10th October 2008 at 10:19 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Quote:
These were my observations: - Excellent SD pictures in both LX700 and LX800. Color is slightly better in 800 when compared to 700, thanx to better contrast ratio of 800. - Terrible SQ from LX800, only two options for sound, normal mode and surround mode; surround mode offers very normal sound, i felt it was like my 21" LG flatron . Sound comes only from below the TV where the speakers are hidden, which I felt not good. Have to increase it beyond 40 for loud volume.- Brilliant surround sound from LX700. It has three sound options. Even 25 is good volume in 700. - Black levels same in both models, excellent. - Both are 100 Hz TV with motion pro. Please have demo of 700 and 800 side by side before taking the plunge.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Hi guys,
My first post to this forum. I was in the same dilemma when I went to purchase a 32" LCD. Found Sony to be expensive and lacking in features. Finalized on Samsung 5, since I felt was value for money with nice features like PIP with (HDMI, Component, AV, PC, etc), USB connectivity, good reviews. But then, when I finally went to the shop, the guys there first tried pushing me for a Sony and then they said Panasonic is a fantastic TV ( which I knew about). So just before I could pay cash for the samy the owner told me to take a look at the LX800. He sat with me and should me the advantages of better clarity and motion side by side with a 5 series. End of it I said I want a samy. Why ? 1. Firstly, some actor's shirt's second line was clearer on the panasonic and not so clear on the 5 series, I didnt care cause while watching the tv to enjoy, it really does not matter ( i work for a video broadcast company and gone through some trainings in MPEG compression, the compression works on visual perception and when we show a beautiful lady dancing and someone is looking at one particular rose in the garden for clarity, we call him having a jaundice eyes), when the story line holds you don't recogonize objects what the director does not want you to see other than the main objects. 2. He showed me some SD video and said look how smooth the image is flowing on the panny, I could not see the difference. In my lab I have kept 3 different brand tvs and compared all this stuff of motion. When I cant see it what is the point. He showed me CNBC stock ticker and showed me the 100 hz technology. It was a little clearer than the sammy, but who the hell cares, and it happens only in the very fast ticker, not the normal ones. 3. IPS technology, great, retains the video clarity in 160 degs angle. But I didnt have that necessity. I am a movie freak, like to watch always from the sweet spot. Its not a restaurent where every table needs to see the screen. Now, why did I still go for the samsung 5 series. Simple, though it had 5% less clarity (which I could recogonize) it did not add artifacts. I was sold when they played a scene from DOOM - II DVD where there is a pan shot and all the TVs except the phillips, sony X and samsung 5 series would just break the motion ( 2:3 pulldown i guess). The samsung was so smooth, it was a different experience. I watch a lot of DVDs and always hate the choppy pan / motion shots. The samsung did the trick MoviePlus feature I guess. Also the contrast, the TV is damn bright. If you feel it is artificial you cut it down. But helps if you are in a bright room in the afternoon. So, I have owned a 5 series for 2 weeks now, just love how the video is so smooth. For the other differences with LX800, I just couldn't make out. Plus the 5 series was a good 5k less. Hope it helps in your choosing. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
Good points reddream. Thanks for the exhaustive comparison. I am also torn between these two.
By the way, where in Bangalore did you purchase the Sammy? What was the price? vinod, The LX700 is very hard to find these days. I think all dealers have sold off their stocks. - Jaganath |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I wld like to know if 700 has Backlight control which 800 has? Backlight control is very imp for getting best picture.Sam 5 has it. Indian web tells 800 has it,but NZ models dont have. So ps tell if 700 has? Secondly is Sound Qy.the only problem or any other drawbacks with 800? (I have HT setup) Last edited by spirovious; 10th October 2008 at 04:05 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
You can get the samsung 5 series 32" for 41,000 at modern world.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to reddream For This Useful Post: | ||
phantom76 (10th October 2008) | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
You can get it at "NEXT" Koramangala for INR 41,500..Last week I bought it for the same price with Bread toaster as a Gift..
Land Mark: Opp. IBP Petrol Bunk , Koramangala.. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to kams For This Useful Post: | ||
phantom76 (10th October 2008) | ||
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads for: Panasonic Viera 32'' LX800 vs Samsung Series 5
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samsung Series 5 46' in Delhi/Gurgaon | rob2651983 | Television | 6 | 14th October 2008 07:39 PM |
| Panasonic Viera TH-42PY800 pricing in asia | gr_babu | Television | 0 | 2nd October 2008 04:31 PM |
| Bravia or Samsung Series 5 | drackz | Television | 18 | 13th August 2008 06:07 PM |
| Panasonic Launches New 2008 Viera Range Of Plasma, LCD TVs In India | Neal | Television | 33 | 13th August 2008 11:53 AM |
| Panasonic LX800 ? | vinod_david | Television | 10 | 5th August 2008 03:12 PM |