32 in LCD comparison

Discuss 32 in LCD comparison at the Television within the HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum; Hi friends, Today I took audition of following 32 in LCD sets- 1.Panasonic 32LX700 & ...

Go Back   HiFiVision.com - India's Audio Video Hi-Fi Forum > Video Components > Television

Notices

Television CRT, Rear Projection, Plasma, LCD/LED


Advertise Here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 25th October 2008, 11:52 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 456
Reputation: 39
Thanks: 76
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
spirovious is on a distinguished road
Arrow 32 in LCD comparison

Hi friends,

Today I took audition of following 32 in LCD sets-

1.Panasonic 32LX700 & 32LE8
2.Samsung 32A550
3.Sharp LC32A33 & A53(100 Hz)
4.Onida 32in Xaria (Faroudja DCDi proc)

I checked both side by side new 8 series has better colours than 7 series.
Response time is same -6ms.
Samy everybody knows.
Sharp is same as pany LE8 in features.
Onida newest with 8 ms

1.SD performance- To me I found Sharp> Onida> Pany> sam (with Big TV)
(Better >>> average)

Surprisingly sharp pictures were closer to CRT watching from 10ft.
Onida was next with sharp SD performance.Rest of to were average.

2.HD performance- Well Pany> Sharp=Sam (Onida HDMI por was non
working)

3.Pany has better in colours,sharpness,but when it comes to 3D effect
then Sam> Sharp> Pany

4.Black levels- Pany is master(8series) I checked with Black & White video.
Sharp & Sam showed hair colour greyish,but Pany 8 showed perfect black.
I observed same with Dolphin HD also.Pany showed Black Dolphin and
others greyish.

5.Panal- Pany is the only with uniformity.
i.e. I switched to news ch. showing taza khabar at bottom.
Lines Headlines moving at bottom frm Rt to Lt.-
*In sharp lines were unreadable even in 100hz model.
also lines were taller at sides of screen as smaller in middle.

*In sam line size was perfect but not clear.

*Pany 8 showed better lines,accurate size from Rt to Lt.
Judder was very less.
Pany 700(100HZ) showed same as 8, but improoved on moving
lines.i.e perfect size,sharpness of lines close to CRT.

I saw Onida with same models in different showroom so don"t
know abt headline review.

I thing it may be helpful.

Pls.post your comments.




Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 26th October 2008, 12:46 AM
vinod_david's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 208
Reputation: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
vinod_david is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by spirovious View Post
Hi friends,

Today I took audition of following 32 in LCD sets-

1.Panasonic 32LX700 & 32LE8
2.Samsung 32A550
3.Sharp LC32A33 & A53(100 Hz)
4.Onida 32in Xaria (Faroudja DCDi proc)

I checked both side by side new 8 series has better colours than 7 series.
Response time is same -6ms.
Samy everybody knows.
Sharp is same as pany LE8 in features.
Onida newest with 8 ms

1.SD performance- To me I found Sharp> Onida> Pany> sam (with Big TV)
(Better >>> average)

Surprisingly sharp pictures were closer to CRT watching from 10ft.
Onida was next with sharp SD performance.Rest of to were average.

2.HD performance- Well Pany> Sharp=Sam (Onida HDMI por was non
working)

3.Pany has better in colours,sharpness,but when it comes to 3D effect
then Sam> Sharp> Pany

4.Black levels- Pany is master(8series) I checked with Black & White video.
Sharp & Sam showed hair colour greyish,but Pany 8 showed perfect black.
I observed same with Dolphin HD also.Pany showed Black Dolphin and
others greyish.

5.Panal- Pany is the only with uniformity.
i.e. I switched to news ch. showing taza khabar at bottom.
Lines Headlines moving at bottom frm Rt to Lt.-
*In sharp lines were unreadable even in 100hz model.
also lines were taller at sides of screen as smaller in middle.

*In sam line size was perfect but not clear.

*Pany 8 showed better lines,accurate size from Rt to Lt.
Judder was very less.
Pany 700(100HZ) showed same as 8, but improoved on moving
lines.i.e perfect size,sharpness of lines close to CRT.

I saw Onida with same models in different showroom so don"t
know abt headline review.

I thing it may be helpful.

Pls.post your comments.
Well done Spirovious ! All great TVs indeed, but what are you going to watch mostly is really important, SD/DVD/Games ? IMO for SD viewing Panasonic is best and for DVD playback too.

I find from your above post, Panasonic ticking most of the boxes. My vote for Panasonic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th October 2008, 10:10 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 456
Reputation: 39
Thanks: 76
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
spirovious is on a distinguished road
Arrow Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by vinod_david View Post
Well done Spirovious ! All great TVs indeed, but what are you going to watch mostly is really important, SD/DVD/Games ? IMO for SD viewing Panasonic is best and for DVD playback too.

I find from your above post, Panasonic ticking most of the boxes. My vote for Panasonic.
Thanks,

But when I checked menu of LX700.I cld not get Backlight option.How did you
get it?any special setting?presets?

My decision is pending between 700 & 800.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26th October 2008, 02:00 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 55
Reputation: 17
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
phantom76 is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Very useful post. I think it boils down to price. If there is a 10% or more difference between Lx800 and 700, go for the 700. You will get better sound and features like PIP.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th October 2008, 03:57 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 456
Reputation: 39
Thanks: 76
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
spirovious is on a distinguished road
Arrow Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom76 View Post
Very useful post. I think it boils down to price. If there is a 10% or more difference between Lx800 and 700, go for the 700. You will get better sound and features like PIP.
update-

Pany LE8 - 31000
700 - 41000
800 - 42000

Shap A33 -30000
A53 - 58000

Colours & dark levels are much better on 800 than 700,then only for sound
is 700 better than 800?(contrast ratio better in 800.)

I feel LCD is for good display and sound with HT.

Any other technical reason?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th October 2008, 04:31 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 55
Reputation: 17
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
phantom76 is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by spirovious View Post
update-

Pany LE8 - 31000
700 - 41000
800 - 42000

Shap A33 -30000
A53 - 58000

Colours & dark levels are much better on 800 than 700,then only for sound
is 700 better than 800?(contrast ratio better in 800.)

I feel LCD is for good display and sound with HT.

Any other technical reason?
I could never audition the LX800 and 700 side-by-side. If you find a significant difference in PQ and only 1k difference in pricing, I feel you should go for 800. SQ can always be improved using external audio, but the PQ can be never improved once you are stuck with a model. Go ahead and get that 800. You will be as happy as me.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phantom76 For This Useful Post:
spirovious (26th October 2008)
  #7  
Old 29th October 2008, 07:47 PM
Dushie's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 252
Reputation: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Dushie is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Excellent work spirovious, the post is informative and detailed,

It clearly shows the dominance of Panny in the 32' lcd screens, my vote will be for Panny too
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7th January 2009, 10:41 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Reputation: 11
Thanks: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
realactivex is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Hi Spiro,
Which TV did you finally choose and what was the price you paid/ which shop (address/contact) did you get it from? And how do you feel abt your purchase now?
Regards
Murali
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7th January 2009, 11:03 AM
madbullram's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 93
Reputation: 17
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
madbullram is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

I saw LE8 and it was awesome. You can get it for 30k from JD Electronics so bargain hard if you are buying that TV.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 7th January 2009, 02:16 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 456
Reputation: 39
Thanks: 76
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
spirovious is on a distinguished road
Re: 32 in LCD comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by realactivex View Post
Hi Spiro,
Which TV did you finally choose and what was the price you paid/ which shop (address/contact) did you get it from? And how do you feel abt your purchase now?
Regards
Murali
I finalised on Pan LE-8 for Rs.30k.
Colours are exellent.Black looks black.Response time & movements are well handled.Dont ask SQ.
DVD playbackk very good with composite.Component improved little further.
Didnt try HDMI as cable was not free with DVDp.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spirovious For This Useful Post:
realactivex (7th January 2009)
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads for: 32 in LCD comparison
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amp Comparison and suggetions Menon Amplifiers 8 12th July 2008 01:01 PM
Feedback on Pioneer DV LX50. Comparison with Pioneer PD D6 ishlesh CD Players 2 16th May 2008 08:34 PM



Advertise Here


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Copyright © 2006-2009, HiFiVision.com All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65