The author provided some mathematical analysis of how Digital/Hi-Res audio influences our listening experience.Didn't see the video, could someone surmise what it says as I don't feel like watching 54 minutes of this.
A very contentious topic .... audio is a very subjective hobby IMHO ...some people only would believe in scientifically verifiable - measurable results - but not two human ears perceive audio in the same fashion. To call them names - highly inappropriate!
Fully agree. IMO it's sheer arrogance to use the term "fool" which is equally attributable to the utterer. Hence modded the title.not two human ears perceive audio in the same fashion. To call them names - highly inappropriate!
We don't get to read every post. Reporting is what would help us in cleaning up wherever required. Being a bit proactive could've set things right isn't it?PS: I have noticed worse terms/ phrases used at this forum, which didn't invite scrutiny. May be it has something to do with how reputed the poster is? If that's the case, that's what needs redressal. If not, may be it's because it wasn't reported?
Being a bit proactive could've set things right isn't it?