CLEARCUT
Active Member
Nowadays Dac is the latest thirst in audiophiles. I am happy to share my experience in Dac. I have come across Ca dacmagic, Ca 24k (Made in England) Aragon but do not know its specification. Ca mclik, Sharp One bit technology, Ps audio ultra link Two, Wyred four sound 1. It is obvious some really good dac does not suppress the original quality but purifies the sound. I do not know how to explain it in the name jitter, reclock. But only if your hifi system is really high end You could identify the quality or purified music difference. The same numbered sabre dac is used in oppo 105 and in my wyred four sound 1. It is heartening to say the dac performance of the Oppo 105(in audio two channel) is very normal. My Wfs is far far superior. On the other hand when I play my Pophorn hour 300 via my dacs I found the audio is better and also better than the audio of some good BD players( Pana 320, Pioneer Lx55). Because I played very good recorded Hd or flac files through my Bdp and Pophorn hour 300 it with hdd. Nowadays I come to know the pophorn hour 410 uses Sabre chip which is nearby Wfs in audio qulaity. So my conclusion is Only really good dac works better than a good audio cd player you can identify the difference only if you have really highend systems. But if playing songs through media centre or cpu It is must to have dac. I like my Wyred four sound one and Ps audio ultra link two than all which I have used earlier. Ca24k also is better than dac magic. I think Ca lost its credential after it started its manufacturing in some other countries. If the next Pophorn hour model comes with a digital input there is no doubt it will rock the hearts of audiophiles heart
Last edited: