Review of LG XXLM6700 series

shaiju_o_thomas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
1,678
Points
83
Location
Bombay, India
Review of LG 55LM6700

Recently I had a chance to demo some of the LED LCD displays from LG, Sony, Samsung and Pansasonic. Let me begin by stating there is nothing more statisfying and fun than doing a demo. I will post my impressions of LG 2012 series, the 55LM6700. It is a mid-range television in series of 6200, 6400, 6690, 6700.

Some key features are:
1) 120Hz TruMotion (as claimed by LG).
2) Cinema screen design.
3) Passive 3D including 2D to 3D conversion. Full HD 3D (as claimed by LG).
4) LED Plus backlight (of no use, will disable most times).
5) Smart TV with Magic Motion remote supplied.

Pros:
1) Cinema screen design: Display is a stunner, both on and off. Though I am not a fan of the the silver stand. It reflects a bit too much screen light and is a distraction at times. The black brushed stand on the higher 7600 should refelct less light and give an impression of the display floating (the purpose behind the stand's design). The silver trim aroud the bezel is well done. So is the "hardly-there" bezel thickeness. Good job on the design. Display itself is very (if not super) slim. For the exact dimensions and weight refer to the LG India site.

2) Passive 3D including 2D to 3D conversion: 3D is enticing on 55" display. Anyone buying TV for 3D usage should look at bigger screens. Smaller dimensions just cannot justice to 3D format. 3D operation on this TV is fuss free. Light weight glasses and good depth. I tried 2D to 3D conversion on few 2D blu rays like Avatar, Tron, Toy Story 3, Unstoppable The Dark Knight. They looked decent. I had not expected the conversion to work this well though there is nothing great shakes about the 3D depth and feel. It worked seamless, hence my excitement. Proper 3D sources are very good. The images are flicker free and bright. The glasses are light weight and forgot that I had it on. There are 3D setting that you can tweak though deviating from the default depth and viewpoint setting causes blurry double images. I did some test on both bright and dim lit scenes and found 3D depth of 1/2 and Viewpoint to -1/-2 to be good. Fiddle with both the settings to avoid ghosting of images.

3) Smart TV: Well laid out and easy to navigate. Connecting to WiFi works like a charm. Not sure if there is a setting to persist the connection but I had to authenticate each time my WiFi was detected.

4) Decent pictures: Blu ray and high def contents looks really good on the 55". Colors are beautiful with decent contrast. Day light scenes looks bright and stunning. So does the animated films. I did the usual run of Lost, Atonement, Casino Royale, Toy Story 3 and The Dark Knight. All of them were well presented whenever there are outdoor scenes.

5) Good viewing angles: I watch from 8-9 ft away. Shifting left or right from this distance does not cause any color/contrast drop off. I did not have chance to test at wide angles but can conclude that display does hold up rather well . Vertical viewing angles are more finicky. The screen looks rather misty bluish/purplish as soon as I stand up (but that's rarely how you watch television).

Sadly, the cons far out weigh the pros. So a short-lived honeymoon.

Cons:
1) Weak blacks, gimmicky LED dimming: For LG it looks like black is blue or purple. The set totally fails when it comes to dim lit scenes. Everything looks hazzy and bluish. It as is there is layer of mist over the display. Here are few blu ray demo materials:
a) Underground tunnel chaperts from The Dark Knight.
b) Last chapter from Atonement (brilliant movie) where an aged Briony confesses.
c) Most of Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides have dark scenes
d) Some night scenes from Lost season 1, disc 1.
In none of the scenes, I could see blacks. More blue/purple tinted pictures which ruins the experience. I just couldn't get this set to display black on any of the test scenes. I watch movies in a dim lit room (in fact some times with no light), thus aggravating the problem to unbearable extent. This is where Samsung and high end Sony scores over LG. In a lit room, the display shows better (perceived) blacks. Note that people with well lit room will find not much trouble with blacks, though it gives rise to another problem - reflections. There is an option to enable LED local dimming (uh?). At the Low level it does not offer any real benefit, turning it to Medium does show slight improvement. However, it does something really unnatural to people's faces, it gives a plastered feel as if the makeup is going to fall off any time. Fine details such as wrinkles are lost.

2) Backlight bleed: Okay, so in a well lit room (with perceived blacks) there will be almost no backlight bleed. Turn down the lights and the screen shows pools of light from almost all corners. What is more irritating is the fact that it the problem is very much visible on letter-boxed / Cinemascope movies. The extent of backlight bleed / flashlight may differ from one unit to another. However, I think that weak black with minor backlight issue is enough to prove as major distraction. Clouding is another major problem.

Again, the last chapter from Atonement is a very good test material. There is nothing on the screen except Briony's wrinkled face. On this scene you see pools of light and the uneveness on edges of the screen is quite an attention grabber.

3) Terrible motion: This is really surprising since the TV is 120 Hz. The camera pan on the first chapter of Atonement reveals so much judder. Even animated Toy Story 3 shows judder (what the hell?). Camera pans are littered with judder. Even the shake of head/waving of hand is enough to cause trouble.

Enabling TruMotion at low setting does nothing to clean up, whereas the high settings introduce shredding and soap opera effect. I wonder if this model is 120 Hz as advertised. If you are a fan of sports then you will see lots of blurry faces and motion trailing. I watched replay of cricket match on Tata Sky HD (1080i/50Hz) and the motion trailing on cricket ball was evident than other LED LCD. If the camera is still, the screen shows beautiful 1080 picture. Trouble starts when there is action. Please do a thorough demo of sports channels before you buy LG TVs. I am sure this can be resolved by high TruMotion setting but then you get shredding and stuttering pictures all over. Some people many be less troubled by these issues but I state that this is one of the worst motion I have seen from a reputed manufacture on a mid-range display.

4) Lost shadow detail: Weak black, uneven backlight results in very poor shadow detailing. Many dark scenes (or even dark colored clothing) looses all dynamics. Only blob of dark greyish mist is visible. This could be a problem inherent to the panel within LG lineup. It is really sad not to see the details and pictures looking more like greyish-holes.

5) Dirty screen: This may differ from unit to unit but LG does have a problem with Dirty Screen Effect (DSE). Watch cricket and you'll see DSE immediately.

6) 3D not full HD: Hmm... this is documented everywhere. Not too much of a deal breaker but it is call false advertising. The problem is evident when you see subtitles, scrolling text, well contrast scenes (most animation). Switch on the TataSky HD menu and you'll see the line structure clearly.

7) Smart TV: This is more of a novetly that will die down in few days. You'll hardly use it as connecting a laptop is much more of a trouble free experience.

I have given a short review of my experience with LG LED LCD. The problems I stated may not hold true for others. So do a demo and make your decision. However, do note that the LM6700 will perform well in the bright showroom floors. It is deceiving. It is unfortunate that the good looking display does not perform nearly as good in a home enviornment. I did a demo of the 55" version. 42" users may see lesser issues due to reduced sized though I don't see how blacks, motion and shadow deatails will improve on smaller screen. Also, you will loose the 3D effect for which the TV is priced at permium.

Sony HX series puts up a better picture for sure though the 3D is a let down. Panasonic ET5 was equivalent to LG thought the picture looked more cinematic and a bit too warm. I'll post a review when time permits.

As I mentioned, it is a short review and I may have not gone in to writing all details and open for discussion.
 
I am considering buying the 42LM6700 actually so this review is very useful (and also disappointing because I love the look of the TV and you have listed a number of cons :( albeit with a disclaimer that it may not apply to others).

I saw the 55LM6200 at Relience and I thought the passive 3d was great - although I understand and agree with your point of bright shore rooms, not to mention the settings on these demo tvs are on overdrive. Also I saw nice animations and have not seen the TV perform on dark pictures. I am still waiting to see an actual demo of a XXLM6700 at one of the stores. That is the kind of midrange TV that I can afford. The retailers in Bangalore are quoting 97k for 42LM6700 which I think is way too high - probably should drop after the festival season.

I would love to go for a 55 or a 47 but budget constraints force me to consider only the 42.

Based on your extensive personal reviews on all brands, which is the best bang for buck among the 3D LED 42 inch TVs? Also what's your take on the active 3D supported by Sony/Samsung versus the passive provided by LG. Which do you personally prefer and why?

Thanks taking the time for the review once again. It really helps people like me.

Cheers
MS
 
^
Yes and Mr.Thomas's review is in line with what major review websites have to say about this TV. Great looks and 3D but 2D performance is disappointing to say the least.
 
The TV is disappointing when it comes to 2D. I visited a reputed showroom yesterday to have another look at 6700 to double check if there are problems only with the one back home. Shadow details are completely lost and motion is very bad. The set was hooked up next to Sony HX and Samsung ES6000/D8000 series. LG was no match in terms of picture quality. Only if LG can fix via firmware updates. A technician visited my place today, hopefully returning this weekend with a fix.

As I mentioned before, there is no reason to buy smaller size display if you want to enjoy 3D.

42LM6700 should be available for less than 90K. Does not make sense to spend so much on a so-so 2D.

I'll post some more views and pictures.

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
I am slightly against this review...

I own a slightly lesser configuration LG XXLW5700 3D TV and as far as motion is concerned , i will vote for this TV. Because i am regular F1 race fan and not a single time i felt that there is a ghosting effect and the motion is remarkable (for an F1 Race!).

When we talk about tata sky HD(i own one as well), the signal relay is only 1080i with 50Hz( as mentioned by the reviewer) and not 120 Hz , so obviously the quality wont be great always as its like watching a DVD on a Bluray player and complaining that the quality is not top notch, as it depends on the input as well.

The best is to check with the original bluray discs played while asking for a demo and not carrying your own hard disk with 10 movies (so called) HD movies for 1 to 1.5 GB size!!! , because the actual Bluray quality comes with around 40 GB and often this is ripped to 1 or 2 GB files in torrents. I am not against carrying HDD, You can carry your own HDD, but if you are satisfied with that then you must be satisfied with Blurays as well. Most of the time, Demo fellows run their own ripped content in the showroom not the original Blurays.

So a lot depend on all these factors as well... :) Hope this explains it all.

Disclaimer: I am not blindly supporting LG here, but i would like to compare other 3D tv's here against LG and see really what others can offer better against LG 3D TV. The simple thing which made me to choose LG 3D TV is the Passive 3D technology used by LG as against Active Shutter 3D technology by its competitors.
 
^

Hey Buddy, I did checked it in the LG showroom today (both LM7600 and LM6700) latest...

LM6700(Reviewed here!) is 400 MCI as against my LW5700 which is 600 MCI.

The major difference between LW5700 and LM6700 is only in MCI and built in Wifi network and i needed a dongle to connect to Wifi(LW5700)

or Do you(avmaxfan) say 2011 models are better than 2012 models...
 
Last edited:
I totally agree with VasanthK. I spent this evening in LG showroom looking at models LM6700 & LM7600. both the TV's were marvelous in terms of clarity and picture,the only difference between the two were MCI and Wifi built in (which in IMHO make the huge cost for 2 models). I think I will have to wait till festival season for some discount to happen as its very expensive or i will have to take LW6500 soon...:(
 
Woooo... hoooo... TGISat/Sun

I'll post some picture and videos taken from a friends' borrowed Sony camera. Meantime, here is something that I stumbled on today for everyone to read regarding LG's new LM series.

LG's latest TV range hit by UK Trading Standards - Neowin

I have read quite a bit (and been told) that LG have undergone major overhaul of display technology in 2012. Well, of what is evident to my eyes it is rather a dull effort.
 
@vasanthk

Yes, for some reason most 2011 TVs seem better than their 2012 successors. And I am not talking about only LG, but Samsung and Sony as well.
 
Styling and external build quality is very good.

DSC00007.JPG



Looks attractive. Though it is 55", the slim bezel gives an impression of it being no bigger than a 50" display. Screen is reflective, though to a lesser extent when switched on.

DSC00008.JPG
 
The best is to check with the original bluray discs played while asking for a demo and not carrying your own hard disk with 10 movies (so called) HD movies for 1 to 1.5 GB size!!! , because the actual Bluray quality comes with around 40 GB and often this is ripped to 1 or 2 GB files in torrents. I am not against carrying HDD, You can carry your own HDD, but if you are satisfied with that then you must be satisfied with Blurays as well. Most of the time, Demo fellows run their own ripped content in the showroom not the original Blurays.

So a lot depend on all these factors as well... :) Hope this explains it all.

Original BR discs that I use for demo. I don't rip movies. Don't have an external HDD.

DSC00014.JPG


Some pics to highlight the weak blacks and blacklight issues.

DSC00015.JPG



DSC00021.JPG


DSC00022.JPG


DSC00025.JPG



It is better with lights on. I replicated using the camera flashlight.

DSC00016.JPG



Wide angle views

DSC00029.JPG


DSC00030.JPG



Am not sure if the camera captured it well. You will notice light bleed at the top, towards the center of the image.

DSC00033.JPG


The blacks are bluish.

DSC00034.JPG


This one was really hard to capture. Notice the ball. The double image, trailing, ghosting (whatever you call it) is very evident while watching cricket. I will upload few videos.

DSC00036.JPG
 
good article @thomas. Point taken! :)

No problem. I like to watch movies and upgraded from 37" LCD to a 50" Plasma 2 years back. I thought things would have improved in 2 years but then came the onslaught of edge lit LED LCD and picture quality seem to have taken a beating.

This review is not to dissuade anyone from buying the TV. I feel that when I spend 1.5L on a TV it should not have so many flaws.

You will find equally good to excellent ratings for this model, but read the reviews in details. They all mention the problems highlighted at the start of this thread. WhatHiFi has given it 5 stars, anyway I don't trust their reviews.

What irked me is the this model is advertised and sold as 120Hz TV. It does no better than 60Hz.

Probably LG may fix the issues with firmware updates, but I don't have the patience and time to keep following it up like I did with PK550.
 
I think Sony HX850 when it comes to picture quality and price is the best LED tv right now. Both LG & Samsung are expensive than Sony this year. Its been two weeks with my tv and its not perfect (no tv is) but its really really good.
 
I think Sony HX850 when it comes to picture quality and price is the best LED tv right now. Both LG & Samsung are expensive than Sony this year. Its been two weeks with my tv and its not perfect (no tv is) but its really really good.

Agree, Sony HX850 series does a good job. I did a demo and pictures looked excellent. Price is a problem, 2L for the 55". I am looking for an upgrade to 55-60" and no Plasma displays come in that size.
 
But when you compare Samsung 8 series it is more than 60k cheaper and the picture quality of Samsung 8 series is not better than Sony HX850. It is even cheaper than LG's LM8600 by 50k and even that is also not better than Sony HX850. Sony HX850 40inch and 46inch is competitively priced if we compare LED's from other brands. I am waiting for Sony HX950 as i think it will be the only LED that will beat HX850.
Agree, Sony HX850 series does a good job. I did a demo and pictures looked excellent. Price is a problem, 2L for the 55". I am looking for an upgrade to 55-60" and no Plasma displays come in that size.
 
A beautiful, well-constructed speaker with class-leading soundstage, imaging and bass that is fast, deep, and precise.
Back
Top