Best Audio Format

TaureanBull

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
680
Points
43
Location
Delhi/Pathankot
I chanced upon this particular site which tells about the audio formats and their abilities to safeguard the quality of the audio. WAV format turn out to be the winner.

Most of my collection is in MP3 format :sad:, which seems to be low on quality. If I convert my MP3 file to WAV files using some converter will it restore the audio quality?

http://www.premiumbeat.com/articles/audio_formats.php
 
Last edited:
I chanced upon this particular site which tells about the audio formats and their abilities to safeguard the quality of the audio. WAV format turn out to be the winner.

Most of my collection is in MP3 format :sad:, which seems to be low on quality. If I convert my MP3 file to WAV files using some converter will it restore the audio quality?

Which Audio Format is best?

Search forums. All you seek shall be found. The Universe is infinite. So is the knowledge in HFV.
And, the short answer to your question is: No. MP3 to Wav conversion does not restore audio quality. What is lost once is lost forever. Like time, childhood, and innocence.
 
and like that precious parker pen gifted by your favourite uncle - next day, gone - lost forever during lunch-break (near the tuck shop)

Hey, that brought back old memories. In my case it was a Parker and a Sheaffer too. An uncle of mine had gifted me the Sheaffer ink pen with a spare nib. After ~20 years I still have the nib - gold plated. Is mint. Looks mint.
Robbers! Whoever you are/were, I hope you rot in hell for stealing my pens. :lol:
 
Is the original sound track always available in WMA format? I go and buy any music most of the time its mp3. Is there any other CD/DVD also existing in WMA format?
 
If I convert my MP3 file to WAV files using some converter will it restore the audio quality?

Unfortunately, no. Compression by MP3, or any other lossy compression mechanism, is irreversible.

In my humble opinion, you must rip all your CDs to wave, using something like Exact Audio Copy. If you want to conserve some space in your hard disk, you can use Monkey's Audio to "zip" your wave files. Monkey's Audio works exactly like winzip/7zip in the sense that you can decompress back to the original uncompressed wave file. It will typically compress a song by about 45-55% of its original size. If you use a media player application or physical media player that can directly play FLAC, then you can also convert your wave files to FLAC (personally, I used Mediacoder to do format conversions). FLAC is lossless compression method with a bit rate of about 900-950 kbps (against 1440 kbps of PCM wave).
 
Is the original sound track always available in WMA format? I go and buy any music most of the time its mp3. Is there any other CD/DVD also existing in WMA format?

TaureanBull, let me clarify a few points for you.

A CD also called, Redbook CD, is the only digital format in which music is stored. A CD uses a format called CDA. This format can only be played from a CD player, and cannot be copied or used as a computer file. A CDA files uses a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz and a sample rate of 2 bytes per sample. Thus it requires 44100*2 or 88200 bytes of storage for every second of a mono song. If you are using stereo it takes 176400 bytes per second. This works out roughly to about 10MB for every minute of song. Most songs that you hear are between 3 to 4 minutes. Thus most songs would occupy about 40MB of space.

WAV (short for Waveform Audio File Format) is a format introduced by Microsoft as a standard for Windows based systems. The format follows closely the standards set by Resource Interchange File Format (RIFF) that was an attempt to make all computer files recognisable by all major operating systems such as MS Windows, Apple OS and Unix. Unfortunately Apple brought out its own AIFF and did not follow the RIFF standards, though there are applications that can recognise a WAV file in Apple OS.

A computer file has three distinct chunks - a header, data, and an index. Though WAV can store and play compressed data, MS wanted WAV to be used by professionals and used uncompressed methodology. Thus it uses the same 44.1 kHz sampling rate and 2 bytes sample per second. In other world, once converted from a CDA to a WAV, there is no difference between the two.

WMA or Windows Media Audi is a different baby altogether. This is actually an audio compression technology and forms part of the Windows Media framework. WMA has four codecs - WMA, WMA Pro, WMA Lossless, and WMA Voice. WMA was introduced as a competition to MP3 and Real Audio. Other codecs were introduced later for different segments. WMA can be used to refer to an audio file format or to it's codec.

A CD can store any computer file as a data file. But, it will have limited use outside the computer and OS on which it was created. A WAV file, for example, cannot be played on most CD and DVD players, but can be played on any Windows OS machine. Most modern players can play MP3, though.

The use of computers as a source has not yet gained enough popularity for music to be recorded and sold in computer based formats. Thus you will continue to see the sale of original music only in Redbook CD formats.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
I chanced upon this particular site which tells about the audio formats and their abilities to safeguard the quality of the audio. WAV format turn out to be the winner.

Most of my collection is in MP3 format :sad:, which seems to be low on quality. If I convert my MP3 file to WAV files using some converter will it restore the audio quality?

Which Audio Format is best?

If you convert MP3 to WAV you dont gain back the lost signal.If you want to keep the MP3 files close to WAV I would suggest you to master MP3s at 320Kbps.I remember posting a thread in this forum where I did a comperative study on various MP3 bitrates.

Do not master MP3 less than 128kbps because the loss is very clearly audible.I have noticed that MP3 has a tndency to cap/limit frequency above 16Khz and this can be reduced if you master at 320Kbps.Mp3s at 320Kbps are not bad for casual listening.

But for serious HI Fi reproduction there is nothing like WAV or even lossless FLAC.
 
Is the original sound track always available in WMA format? I go and buy any music most of the time its mp3. Is there any other CD/DVD also existing in WMA format?

Its just because of the huge popularity of MP3ss, we have started getting legal MP3 discs as well ,but the truth is MP3 is lossy and is not the original audio format. The original format for CD is CDA (Compact Disc-Digital Audio) and WAV when ripped on a HDD. WMA is also a compression technology and is lossy format. There is also a WMA Lossless, supposed to be ...well emm lossless, but never tried. I have tried FLAC and Apple lossless, with FLAC my fav because of its player compatibility.
 
venkatcr, deba and sam9s thanks a lot. That was a wonderful piece of infromation.

Just out of curiosity what our audiophiles in the forum doing? Using mp3s? If the mp3 has a good bit rate as mentioned would the difference be noticeable on the audiophile equipment?
 
venkatcr, deba and sam9s thanks a lot. That was a wonderful piece of infromation.

Just out of curiosity what our audiophiles in the forum doing? Using mp3s? If the mp3 has a good bit rate as mentioned would the difference be noticeable on the audiophile equipment?

If you dont have a very very sharp ear it is very difficult to identify a MP3 at 320Kbps file from WAV or CDA. I did some blind A/B testing on few people and they were not able to tell the difference.
 
Last edited:
venkatcr, deba and sam9s thanks a lot. That was a wonderful piece of infromation.

Just out of curiosity what our audiophiles in the forum doing? Using mp3s? If the mp3 has a good bit rate as mentioned would the difference be noticeable on the audiophile equipment?

Mp3 is a compressed audio format for sharing music easily and for use in portable gadgets.

Audiophiles do not use Mp3 for listening to music. They use CDs or Lossless flacs/Wav.

Mp3 in whatever bit rate are lossy and the difference can be heard on audiophile grade gear. The more resolving your gear, the more irritating (read-bright and artificially exciting) the mp3 will sound. On less resolving gear, the Mp3 will sound impressive. Wav and Flac will sound more analogue and natural. Gear which reproduce sound which is close to analogue and natural are expensive unless you DIY. One good way to check the difference between Mp3 (high bit rate) and Wav files is to do the comparison in a high end headphone setup.
 
Last edited:
If you dont have a very very sharp ear it is very difficult to identify a MP3 at 320Kbps file from WAV or CDA. I did some blind A/B testing on few people and they were not able to tell the difference.


On what equipment did you conduct this experiment?
 
Last edited:
If you dont have a very very sharp ear it is very difficult to identify a MP3 at 320Kbps file from WAV or CDA. I did some blind A/B testing on few people and they were not able to tell the difference.

Depends more on the equipment actually, higher you go (in quality) more audiable the difference is ......
 
Last edited:
Check out our special offers on Stereo Package & Bundles for all budget types.
Back
Top