ChatGPT vs audio forums

essrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
548
Points
93
Location
Goa
Had a holy shit moment today. I have a ChatGPT Plus account, and was confused on which version of a very boutique very esoteric DAC from Ukraine to replace my Nagra Tube DAC that I recently sold.

Once upon a time I would be scouring forums, googling the life out of me, and asking Audiophile buddies. But look at this ChatGPT output, when I put in my music preference, the topologies of the dac, the rest of my system details:


Output >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Thanks — this gives me the perfect context.
You have a dreamy, musical setup already:
  • Shindo Cortese 300B: Pure SET magic — lush midrange, natural tone, incredible microdynamics.
  • DeVore O/96: Full-range, expressive, dynamic speakers with real weight and warmth — excellent for tone and texture.
  • Musical taste: Hindustani + Fusion + Bob Dylan = emotionally rich, midrange-focused, acoustic textures, natural vocals, and flow over precision.

🔥 What This Setup Prioritizes:

  • Tone > Detail
  • Emotion > Resolution
  • Flow > Analytics
  • Microdynamics > Slam
  • Organic > Clinical

🎯 Best DACs for Your System

Here’s how your setup synergizes with the DACs:
DACSynergy with Shindo + Devore + Your MusicVerdict
DAC2.41 SignatureExcellent. The selected TDA1541A + 6SN7 tubes + better LPF + EI transformer = natural tone, full mids, no digital glare, and improved air. Supports 24/192 for future-proofing.Top Pick (best balance of analog soul and clarity)
PSYCHE SEBig, warm, romantic. Would overlap tonally with your amp and speakers—might feel too syrupy for fusion or complex recordings.Great, but possibly too lush
HERMES SE (AD1862 or PCM63)More resolution and bass articulation. Can sound slightly less “magic” in midrange compared to TDA1541A, but PCM63 mod is outstanding for Hindustani and Dylan. Might tilt more neutral.Runner-up (if you ever crave more layering & separation)
DAC2.41 (Base)Very good, but slightly veiled highs and more modest power filtering compared to the Signature. May sound slightly smaller and less refined.Skip (Signature is a direct upgrade)
DAC U1Romantic and smooth with strong midrange, but lacks chip pedigree and depth of Signature or Hermes. Good for vocals, less so for complex fusion.Good budget alternative
DAC 4.2 SESmooth and natural, but simpler stage and components. Might feel a bit underpowered for your system.Not ideal (your setup deserves more)

🏆 Final Recommendation:

✅ Go with: DAC2.41 Signature

  • Rich tube tone without excess warmth.
  • TDA1541A suits Indian classical instruments perfectly — sarod, sitar, tabla bloom with life.
  • 6SN7 adds midrange clarity and openness.
  • EI transformer gives organic flow that matches Shindo’s voicing.
  • Improved LPF = better treble extension and instrument separation, important for fusion and acoustic layering.

👌 Alternative: HERMES SE with PCM63 or AD1862

  • If you ever want to hear deeper into the mix or have more articulate bass, this is a great second option.
  • Less analog euphony than TDA1541A, but more control and detail.

If you're deciding between Signature and Hermes SE, I’d suggest:
  • Stick with Signature for now if tone and emotional resonance are your north star.
  • Consider Hermes later as a complementary DAC if you ever want to experiment with greater dynamics, bass focus, or modern recordings.
Let me know if you'd like a shortlist of test tracks to audition the DACs with.
 
ChatGPT is amazing tool to analyze the system, music and help out buying with gear even. It can open whole new way of obsession in this hobby. Its enriching as well.

Screenshot 2025-07-09 at 12.07.17 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-07-09 at 12.09.24 PM.png
 
My experience with ChatGPT is quite contrary and that to me it doesn't give an impression of being intelligent enough. Perhaps it can rattle off a few facts and figures, but really falters when there are conflicting facts and figures - it is unable to judge what is sensible and what is not. Unfortunately, you will realize this only if you have in depth knowledge about the subject and have already researched the internet.

To give you example:
I was searching for an amplifier+speaker combination for my guitar processor. Now guitar processors themselves come with speaker and cabinet emulation, hence requires flat response speakers. Also my requirement was sound output levels of 105-110 dB since it has to compete with acoustic drum kit.

I tried using ChatGPT to find from the market which equipment will suit me (electric guitar amp, acoustic guitar amp, bass guitar amp, keyboard amp, desktop monitor, PA system). It gave response as a 10-year old who has memorized the entire library, but without any depth or understanding. Frequently suggesting me equipment which doesn't have tweeters (necessary to get >5000 Hz spectrum) or full range speakers. Was also wrong about the product specs in few cases! Thankfully with many questions and corrections it was able to come to a result that looked OK to me. But it did take much effort, all though much lesser than searching the internet on own; well I can imagine some novice seeking ChatGPT advice and getting stuck with inferior suggestions.
 
An AI is only as good as the data it gets. Its a great way to scour multitudes of data and summarize intelligently but considering it looks through forums, all the biases that make up the data is also an output
 
A beautiful, well-constructed speaker with class-leading soundstage, imaging and bass that is fast, deep, and precise.
Back
Top