I know that's what you're saying. You are just assuming we have no experience with high resolution playback. Trust me, there's lots of it.
Also, the "experience" of anything audio, be it formats or electronics, has more to do with factors not related to "how it sounds" at all. People associate entire lines of brands as warm, laid-back, bright and what not. Change LED colors to between Red/Blue/Yellow..and you'll have people proclaiming it sounds warm/methodical/detailed etc....yes, for the SAME amp.
They've (the hi-fi industry) exploited all other ideas already--magic pebbles, markers, clocks, voodoo cables, DACs, jitter ghosts etc etc..and now they'll stretch this resolution war like a chewing gum
Do an honest ABX test (foobar2k will let you) between 16/44 and 24/192 of the same recording with a band limit of 20k. If you really can pick the higher resolution with a better-than-chance probability, then you shouldn't listen to any of us and just enjoy your music. I, personally, cannot. Heck, I have trouble differentiating my laptop headphone out from an Audinst HUDMX1.
HOWEVER, I own about 60 odd MFSL and Japan First Press, Black Triangle CDs--and I can probably pick them out a 100% of the time against any HR track, DSD, SACD etc.