Yesterday i attend a party at a friends house. As usual a mini PA sound system was setup and we have sometime playing some of our favorite CDs on it. Because the originally used Behringer PA speaker sounded unmusical we switched it with the living rooms Pioneer HPM 100.
The system:
Pioneer DVD player (cant recall the model, cheap design with mic inputs)
Behringer 31band 2 channel pro equalizer
Behringer EP2000 poweramp
After taking sometime tweaking the equalizer, to our surprise, the music seemingly appeared more live and enjoyable compare to the living rooms system. Refuse to believe what we heard, many opinions were gave, suggesting the outdoor compound did not have negative acoustic feedback or the Behringer amp has more headroom. Out of curiosity, we decided to bring out the rest of the living rooms system to the compound and make some comparison.
The living rooms system:
Audiolab 8000CDM cd transport
Audiolab 8000DAC
Audiolab 8000S intergrated amplifier
Chord interconnects
QED silver XT speaker cables
The Audiolab intergrated amplifier was used as a preamp connected to Behringer poweramp driving the HPM100 for more power.
Link 1 DVD player analog out to EQ
Link 2 CD transport digital out to DAC
CDs tested:
Chris De Burghs into the light
Groundations young tree
Boney Ms the greatest hits
Yes they are all quite hot music since it was a party.
Switch between the 2 link and the difference was night and day. With the first link, the music can be fine tuned to get rid of digital glitch and still maintain crisp hi while tuning the lower octave to have a warm tube-like sound which isnt possible on the second link no matter how the speakers were toed and placed.
Was it magic or are we just amazed by something different? Still, no one wanna admit about preferring colored over flat sound but cant deny link 1 offers a more solid performance. Link 2 just sounded thin and bright in comparison. And i failed to notice how using tone controls cause the music to be out of phase since everything sounds ok on link1, at least to my immature ears
Although me and my friends are quite enthusiastic on audio stuff but none of us were experience listeners, thus i like to post a few question here hoping to obtain more knowledge before buying a better equalizer in a haste( i owned a 10band Marantz eq but it hardly ever achieved the fine tuning result like of the pro eq).
Does neutral matters that much since different DAC/speaker present different frequency curve anyway?
Why equalizer is essential in studio and stage music but often got reject in higher end home stereo?
People often claim they want to listen to the actual sound of the recording in accordance with the producers/engineers/musicians intention but how possible is that? It is not like our rooms and audio gears are identical to those use in the studio process of reproduction.
Appreciate any inputs, thanks.
The system:
Pioneer DVD player (cant recall the model, cheap design with mic inputs)
Behringer 31band 2 channel pro equalizer
Behringer EP2000 poweramp
After taking sometime tweaking the equalizer, to our surprise, the music seemingly appeared more live and enjoyable compare to the living rooms system. Refuse to believe what we heard, many opinions were gave, suggesting the outdoor compound did not have negative acoustic feedback or the Behringer amp has more headroom. Out of curiosity, we decided to bring out the rest of the living rooms system to the compound and make some comparison.
The living rooms system:
Audiolab 8000CDM cd transport
Audiolab 8000DAC
Audiolab 8000S intergrated amplifier
Chord interconnects
QED silver XT speaker cables
The Audiolab intergrated amplifier was used as a preamp connected to Behringer poweramp driving the HPM100 for more power.
Link 1 DVD player analog out to EQ
Link 2 CD transport digital out to DAC
CDs tested:
Chris De Burghs into the light
Groundations young tree
Boney Ms the greatest hits
Yes they are all quite hot music since it was a party.
Switch between the 2 link and the difference was night and day. With the first link, the music can be fine tuned to get rid of digital glitch and still maintain crisp hi while tuning the lower octave to have a warm tube-like sound which isnt possible on the second link no matter how the speakers were toed and placed.
Was it magic or are we just amazed by something different? Still, no one wanna admit about preferring colored over flat sound but cant deny link 1 offers a more solid performance. Link 2 just sounded thin and bright in comparison. And i failed to notice how using tone controls cause the music to be out of phase since everything sounds ok on link1, at least to my immature ears
Although me and my friends are quite enthusiastic on audio stuff but none of us were experience listeners, thus i like to post a few question here hoping to obtain more knowledge before buying a better equalizer in a haste( i owned a 10band Marantz eq but it hardly ever achieved the fine tuning result like of the pro eq).
Does neutral matters that much since different DAC/speaker present different frequency curve anyway?
Why equalizer is essential in studio and stage music but often got reject in higher end home stereo?
People often claim they want to listen to the actual sound of the recording in accordance with the producers/engineers/musicians intention but how possible is that? It is not like our rooms and audio gears are identical to those use in the studio process of reproduction.
Appreciate any inputs, thanks.