Move over analogue radio tuners, DSP is here

Subbu68

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
968
Points
93
Location
ABU DHABI, UAE
Had posted in @santaji thread on Jetking kits about my search and research on current crop of radios. DSP radios seem to be a big step. Quality radios like Sony, Panasonic, Sangean, TECSUN etc.moved to DSP. Got two DSP radios with analogue scale to start with..

Here's a comparison video analogue Sony ICFJ40 vs DSP Sony ICF19. Both on FM 89.1 some 160kms away, inside the apartment, antenna folded. Right is ICF19 playing first , Left is ICFJ40
 
Last edited:
@Subbu68, DSP tuning is pervasive now, it’s difficult to find a new pure analog tuner these days. At most one gets an analog scale where tuning is still DSP assisted.

The verdict on DSP is still however, split. I have been doing some research to buy a serious FM radio and what I concluded is the following:

- If listening to select radio stations is the objective, then DSP is well-suited for it. It improves the selectivity of the station (containing the interference from nearby stations) and results in clearer reception. Also it holds onto the signal well without drifting. This works well for most listeners explaining why all manufacturers have shifted onto DSP.

- But if your main purpose is DXing (surfing the waves and exploring newer, distant stations), the tuning experience with even the best DSPs leaves a lot to be desired in comparison with analog tuning of the past. The biggest problem is muting (you don’t hear a sound between two stations - something which normal users would like, but DXers hate. Then, you risk the DSP tuning skipping weaker stations which you got to hear faintly on analog tuning (and then could converge upon by fine tuning, antenna movement etc). Then there are unwanted pops/clicks in some DSP tuners or even the rise and fall in volume levels while tuning which is irritating. The analog tuning experience is generally considered a smoother one. Having said that, the better DSP tuners can extract more number of stations in a scan than most DXers can unless they spend hours with it.
 
@Subbu68, DSP tuning is pervasive now, it’s difficult to find a new pure analog tuner these days. At most one gets an analog scale where tuning is still DSP assisted.

The verdict on DSP is still however, split. I have been doing some research to buy a serious FM radio and what I concluded is the following:

- If listening to select radio stations is the objective, then DSP is well-suited for it. It improves the selectivity of the station (containing the interference from nearby stations) and results in clearer reception. Also it holds onto the signal well without drifting. This works well for most listeners explaining why all manufacturers have shifted onto DSP.

- But if your main purpose is DXing (surfing the waves and exploring newer, distant stations), the tuning experience with even the best DSPs leaves a lot to be desired in comparison with analog tuning of the past. The biggest problem is muting (you don’t hear a sound between two stations - something which normal users would like, but DXers hate. Then, you risk the DSP tuning skipping weaker stations which you got to hear faintly on analog tuning (and then could converge upon by fine tuning, antenna movement etc). Then there are unwanted pops/clicks in some DSP tuners or even the rise and fall in volume levels while tuning which is irritating. The analog tuning experience is generally considered a smoother one. Having said that, the better DSP tuners can extract more number of stations in a scan than most DXers can unless they spend hours with it.
I don't like digital tuners just for one reason. You just cannot tune in to very weak stations.
 
and for the DIY community, analog radio components like variable gang capacitors, trimmers, IF Transformers, Antenna and Oscillator coils, ferrite rods, OA79 diodes, etc have all disappeared from the market.
 
Get the Award Winning Diamond 12.3 Floorstanding Speakers on Special Offer
Back
Top