But you said
--------------------------------------
You also said
--------------------------------------
Also said by you
--------------------------------------
Oh brother this belongs to you
--------------------------------------
You better sort out what you want to say. I am posting out of my skin which is not my character. So please be specific and clear.
Regards
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambio View Post
I have nothing against WCM
But you said
Quote:
Everything about WCM is rather paradoxical to the true purpose of music.
--------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambio View Post
I agree they are useful to used to demonstrate one's system.
You also said
Quote:
WCM was cited because the sample was grossly out specs the humble hifi system to replicate.
--------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambio View Post
Please understand there are genuine classical music lovers ( you included)
Also said by you
Quote:
The public do not really care for WMC.
--------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambio View Post
who understand the emotions that they convey.
Oh brother this belongs to you
Quote:
Tell me if you have seen this kind of emotion in a WMC???
--------------------------------------
You better sort out what you want to say. I am posting out of my skin which is not my character. So please be specific and clear.
Regards
1) I am not against wcm or pungi if that's your taste.
2) Yes. Everything about wcm is confusing. You sit still. Many do not know whether the music convey anger or happiness. I even described how disillusional were the audience responding to the death of JFK in the orchestra hall.
3) Yes, they are great to demo you system. You can show how low it can go. How loud it can play. How clearly it can resolve the softest and loudest passage in split seconds. Where's the confusion?
4) Yes, again!. How can one expected to replicated live concert hall music when the recording itself may not contain the actual dynamic range. And not to mention about the stereo playback. If someone were to spend 50 years trying to match live music using wmc as a reference than I am not surprised to see them disappointed. No contradiction there.
5) Yes again. Their dynamic range is beyond what most system could replicate.
6) Public means majority in this context. It is like I am expressing my opinion about same sex union. Just because there are people like that and I accept the reality of that it doesn't mean the public accepts them. Would it be clearer to you if I use the majority of the public?
7) When you quote, please quote in full. I said to Thad:-
I have nothing against WCM and I agree they are useful to used to demonstrate one's system. Please understand there are genuine classical music lovers ( you included) who understand the emotions that they convey.
Just like rock or Carnatic you can get involved in the music that you familiarize with. The may know the message. Do you know what emotion is Brahms Symphony no.4 movement 2 trying to convey? You don't get that confused when listening to Don't cry for me Argentina. If a music genre fails to reach the masses then it failed in its purpose.
8) Motionless and expressionless audience are the norm in wcm halls. It is possible to see a few to shed tears but they are the exception.
BTW, would you mind giving me 3 months out of your wasted 30 years and I show what you have been missing all this while.
I am criticizing the wcm for the style and musical composition. In no way, I am criticizing the sound of piano or the orchestra. The reason I actually listen to soundtracks is for their rich musical contents of the orchestra. John Barry, John Williams, Andrew Lloyd, Iilayaraja, Rahman and many many more are fine example what non wcm orchestra can give that reaches the masses.