Poor telecast by ESPN STAR for Cricket World cup

How is the telecast by ESPN STAR for this cricket world cup 2011?


  • Total voters
    28

greentree

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2010
Messages
62
Points
0
Location
Pune
Does any body feel that the current telecast by ESPN STAR is bad.. literally worse..
Whenever the batsman hits a six or the ball reaches boundary the camera is being taken somewhere first and then locates the ball after a sec or two..

Poor camera replays.. I gues Sony Set max does a better job than this for IPL..

Cheers
Nag
 
Canduu,
In the other thread, it had WARM UP matches in the title and not only that i am more concerned about the camera angles and stuff which wasn't mentioned there.. so had to start this thread with the Poll..

Cheers
Nag
 
Cannduu,Greentree,

Me only started that forum .

As a true lover of cricket disappointed with the way ESPN-Start is broadcasting this event.They are spenting money to bring all idiot commentators (Altest 20 i think).But not spenting single penny on Camera and other aspect.Look at the Hawkye they are showing the Hawkye view after 2-3 minutes of the Live and there is no Hotspot capture(thermal Image) see whether the ball is hit the bat or not .Wht ever ESPN-STAR is showing now is nothing new its old technology which is used in the 1999 world cups.

They are telling they have telecasting the matches in HD . but where is the HD Cameras i havent seen any special cameras for the Event in the stadium they are all SD camera's and wht they are doing is upsaling the broadcast before the uplink it self. You can the see the difference if you have watched the CWG -Delhi 2010. There was HD Cameras installed all arround the Stadiums and they have down played the HD content to SD to show the Live content to show to the SD viewers. Here its vice versa.
 
I agree with all the discussion here, but trust me ESPN Star is the best bet in India for telecasting Cricket at the moment. All other channels are a big bunch of jokers who are incapable of executing their routine job which makes the viewers and enthusiasts feel disappointed.

Ten sports and Sony Set Max don't let you watch the 6th ball of every over and half of first ball of the next over. They think apart from bowler bowling and batsmen swinging at it, nothing else in cricket needs to be shown to the viewers apart from hearing the so called stereotype experts.

Trust me, for the true cricket fans and lovers and for the youngsters wanting to learn and imitate the heroes of cricket, its best to watch matches and series where India is not playing and preferably Australia, England or South Africa is hosting. The technology there as well as broadcasting along with commentary will all be top class, only if India is not involved. The commercial interests and advertisements are truly killing this game here in spite of pumping in so much money, there will come a day in future when Indians realise money is not everything. Indian commentators like Arun Lal, Harsha Bhogle, Charu Sharma to name a few are idiots to the core in the aspect I have seen of them which is Cricket. Its infuriating to hear them wag their tongues about strategies in cricket and the quality Indian players. Harsha Bhogle once started boasting about cricket he used to play when in school and compared his highly talented potential with that of mediocre Indian International players. :signthankspin:No matter what, one of them will feature in any tournament India takes part, only assumption I can make of it is may be they come and work for free or dirt cheap and the channels try and make profits by employing them due to their cost factor.:rolleyes:

The only remedy IMO is upto BCCI to create and put forth standards in broadcasting apart from everything else they do, but they are way busy in either counting their bank accounts, enter into scams or publicise the scams done by previous boards.

If its a India match and given a choice, I would pick ESPN Star any day. However, its a long way away for them to reach the standards of Channel 9 and co., but it doesn't matter to them as long as their money coffers are filling. They at least showed the complete 6 balls of an over up-to now.

To summarise all the rantings I made here, whats lacking in broadcasting of matches here in India is the passion that people share for the very same game.:sad:
 
Last edited:
You are absolutely right Ananth.Its Bunch of Jokers called Indian Commentator who split their tongue only for money and Media persons don't know wht is cricket and commenting about the shot selection of Tendulkar and Dravid killing the true spirit of Game.

True PaSSIONATE cricket lovers not getting the ticket to watch live matches because high society people who don't know anything about cricket but glamour gets it and wants to show off their face in TV. This is was happening now.

Yesterdays match i was seriously praying for england's Victory because we Indians dont deserves to be Top of Cricket World.
 
They dint have many technologies which where in use previously.. To mention one is snickometer.. I agree that Set Max doesnt show you the 6 ball but i remember that they probably had more camera angles than what its now in ESPN..
I am also a fan of ESPN STAR but i am truly disappointed with the way its gone till now in this world cup and i think it will not change also for this world cup.. :(
 
Greentree,

Dont expect much from these Channels.They Know people will watch it wht ever crap they give it to the people. I was a true lover of Indian Cricket. But now i hate these people.....All are greedy for money including our legend (Including current )cricketers dont want to name them here.....
 
STAR HD is fantastic - and no advertisements - I love it :-) Sorry no idea about ESPN - just not bothered to change the channel.
 
I love watching the game without any ads,don't bother much about commentary most of the times.
 
There was HD Cameras installed all arround the Stadiums and they have down played the HD content to SD to show the Live content to show to the SD viewers. Here its vice versa.
Even with the world cup it's the same. The cameras are all HD and what you see in ESPN, STAR Cricket and STAR Sports is downscaled and cropped content. To see the difference switch back between STAR CRICKET HD and the above mentioned SD channels and you will see the difference in the frame captured.
I agree about the absence of many camera angles, super slow motion, thermal imaging, etc,etc
The initial matches didn't even show ball speed..though it's there now.
 
Last edited:
Scream loudly,no one is willing to hear you.bcos they know what they are doingi,poor customers
 
there was an issue with the hot spot thermal imaging equipment. the aussie firm refused to ship these to india as its sensitive military grade hardware and the second issue was that the CWG morons havent yet returned the equipment that they rented from aussie firms.
 
hot spot is best technology than hawk eye ,hawk is only predicts but hot spot is wat is real............
we should be ashamed to not having such technology in this big event.
................UDRS without HOTSPOT sucks..................
 
You are absolutely right Ananth.Its Bunch of Jokers called Indian Commentator who split their tongue only for money and Media persons don't know wht is cricket and commenting about the shot selection of Tendulkar and Dravid killing the true spirit of Game.

True PaSSIONATE cricket lovers not getting the ticket to watch live matches because high society people who don't know anything about cricket but glamour gets it and wants to show off their face in TV. This is was happening now.

Yesterdays match i was seriously praying for england's Victory because we Indians dont deserves to be Top of Cricket World.

Are u Pakistani ?

Why should we not be on top of the cricket world. Just cause some stupid HD broadcast is not good enough ? Get a life man. Come up with better reasons.
 
Are u Pakistani ?

Why should we not be on top of the cricket world. Just cause some stupid HD broadcast is not good enough ? Get a life man. Come up with better reasons.


What more reasons you want ?...

I am a True Lover of Cricket not a Blind

India's Largest Stadium didn't get the any india specific match because of pure political fight.

True lovers of sports are not getting a single ticket watch any of the India specific match.

World 4 Largest sporting Event's Final is Happening in a Small Capacity Stadium.

What you want more ?.... tell me .... What you can proud of this world becuase you are an Indian Tell me ?.....

Please see the facts first......then comment on it boss.
 
Are u Pakistani ?

Why should we not be on top of the cricket world. Just cause some stupid HD broadcast is not good enough ? Get a life man. Come up with better reasons.


What more reasons you want ?...

I am a True Lover of Cricket not a Blind Indian Cricket Fan

India's Largest Stadium didn't get the any india specific match because of pure political fight.

True lovers of sports are not getting a single ticket to watch any of the India specific match.(Only 30000 even Kenya

World 4 Largest sporting Event's Final is Happening in a Small Capacity Stadium.

What you want more ?.... tell me .... What you can proud of this world Cup an an Indian Tell me ?.....

Please see the facts first......then comment on it boss.
 
Last edited:
we should agree that bcci got a great impact in icc, being such a strong country in administration we are not up to the mark in our grounds,flood lights,commentary etc...........
all the teams in the world knows the dominance of Indian team and their admin in world cricket,then y to have such a poor broad cast? this shows how much we r in backlog,
OT:wat do u think abt our poor grounds & poor blowers?
 
The Matches which India plays were SQ is Good But Today's south Africa VS England Match PQ is Really bad.

I think the Issue is When There is two mathes on the same days.....Today we have IND vs IRD also.
Any thoughts ?.
 
Last edited:
Purchase the Audiolab 6000A Integrated Amplifier at a special offer price.
Back
Top