svenkateshsmart
Well-Known Member
Dear Mods,
I am compelled to point out that there have been discrepancies in the way of moderation of for-sale and other posts. As discussed a number of times in the past, I understand that this is a private forum, but I feel there should be transparency to an extent.
Personally, I have received 2 infractions 1) for not posting pictures with handwritten HFV name and date, though the pictures had my username and date which was added via image editing software. I later understood this is very important to indicate, as explained by a forum member, that the equipment was in our personal possession at the time of sale.
However, there have been several posts violating rules that have been approved without issues. I believe all the "For Sale" threads are thoroughly reviewed before approval, but not sure how some are approved and some are not. Needless to say, it may average anywhere between 10-15 per day which I think is not a huge number.
My point is not to ask for "bad privilege" by citing the errors, "to err is human". This definitely lowers morale of other forum members and brings up a question of being biased.
so, there have been a number of posts having "f***", s***, etc., which are also not removed.
I hope mods will definitely look into this.
Cheers!
I am compelled to point out that there have been discrepancies in the way of moderation of for-sale and other posts. As discussed a number of times in the past, I understand that this is a private forum, but I feel there should be transparency to an extent.
Personally, I have received 2 infractions 1) for not posting pictures with handwritten HFV name and date, though the pictures had my username and date which was added via image editing software. I later understood this is very important to indicate, as explained by a forum member, that the equipment was in our personal possession at the time of sale.
However, there have been several posts violating rules that have been approved without issues. I believe all the "For Sale" threads are thoroughly reviewed before approval, but not sure how some are approved and some are not. Needless to say, it may average anywhere between 10-15 per day which I think is not a huge number.
My point is not to ask for "bad privilege" by citing the errors, "to err is human". This definitely lowers morale of other forum members and brings up a question of being biased.
so, there have been a number of posts having "f***", s***, etc., which are also not removed.
I hope mods will definitely look into this.
Cheers!
.. Dont get angry since your post is getting rejected and you got infraction for nothing . You had a bad time that day and mods are not good that day.
