I don’t think anyone has read what fiftyfifty is asking for and what Keith has reiterated. It’s why you find music connecting with you on one system and not on another and why is this so. It’s not about lyrics or being in the right mood 

IME, it's more to do with the software than the hardware. But am not sure 100%.Some interesting responses and wonderful listening experiences shared by fellow FMs! Thanks.
Let us reframe the initial question:
Let us take the emotion felt by the listener out of the situation. Let us ignore his mood, upbringing, environmental factors, etc. Instead, let us consider the composer, arranger or artiste who wishes to express a certain emotion through the music. What does he or she do to achieve this? He/She uses tonal modulation, sustained notes, syncopation, tongueing (voices and wind instruments) etc., etc. Pure technique. My musician fellow FMs will know this. There are some systems that reproduce this well and some that do not. This reproduction is not subjective (though the impact on the listener is). I can play the same music through two different setups or I play it using two different speaker placements or two different sets of cables and you WILL HEAR the difference, notwithstanding your mood or state of mind. You may not feel any emotional connect but you will still be able to hear those subtle nuances of the music. As long as you listen attentively.
So the question really is 'What attributes of the setup correctly reproduce the intended emotional content?' As @arj mentioned, it may have a lot to do with Coherency and Dynamics. And the right resolution. Too much resolution may work against coherency.
100% agree with you. My goal is also in the pursuit to get pitch black background and have achieved it by Cyrus.For me, it is the spookiness of my system where the sound emanates from the black hole. This silent background also helps in revealing the bumps in the notes and voices that contribute greatly to the realism and there-ness of the music/performance in your room. I never thought this could be realized but as I stated replacing SMPS-based power supplies in my chain with top-tier Sean Jacobs power supplies, experiences changed drastically.
Please see if this demonstrates this attribute though, I am not sure if phone capture is doing 100% justice.
Some interesting responses and wonderful listening experiences shared by fellow FMs! Thanks.
Let us reframe the initial question:
Let us take the emotion felt by the listener out of the situation. Let us ignore his mood, upbringing, environmental factors, etc. Instead, let us consider the composer, arranger or artiste who wishes to express a certain emotion through the music. What does he or she do to achieve this? He/She uses tonal modulation, sustained notes, syncopation, tongueing (voices and wind instruments) etc., etc. Pure technique. My musician fellow FMs will know this. There are some systems that reproduce this well and some that do not. This reproduction is not subjective (though the impact on the listener is). I can play the same music through two different setups or I play it using two different speaker placements or two different sets of cables and you WILL HEAR the difference, notwithstanding your mood or state of mind. You may not feel any emotional connect but you will still be able to hear those subtle nuances of the music. As long as you listen attentively.
So the question really is 'What attributes of the setup correctly reproduce the intended emotional content?' As @arj mentioned, it may have a lot to do with Coherency and Dynamics. And the right resolution. Too much resolution may work against coherency.