how many of you guys think bose's bad rep is justified?
i have heard/seen a lot of people complain that bose doesn't publish technical specifications (but they do give ohms and amp wattage) or the small design of its cubic sattelites cannot deliver the full range or that bose uses cheap material.
but their fundamental philosophy is different right?
if sonus faber thinks that making a speaker in the shape of a musical instrument (lute), will make the sound as natural/lifelife as possible, bose focuses on what it defines as psychoacoustics : "the spatial properties of the radiated sound in typical listening spaces (homes and apartments) and the implications of spatiality for psychoacoustics, i.e. the listener's head as a sonic diffraction object as part of the system".
that is its own unique perspective which is radically different from the way audio is approached by other companies.
so little surprise that people who are conditioned to the dynamics of what passes for hifi with most industry products, cannot relate to the fundamental philosophy of bose.
once in an audio showroom in new york, the sales guy told me that you cannot get the full body of the sound from such tiny speakers. but in a bose system, the acoustimass unit which is wrongly identified as a bass unit, actually delivers the midrange. it is a different design not only from the conventional speaker design, but also other small speaker companies like gallo, orb, pinnacle etc whose bass unit is precisely what they claim it to be - a subwoofer.
another complaint is that the material used for speakers is cheap. but i am not sure how valid such an argument is because the material used for the top on a gibson es 335 guitar (one of the most expensive guitars) is actually plywood. gibson deliberately uses this because it gives the 335 its unique tone. but i do fantasize how a bose system would sound with say aluminium sattelites. likewise with better speaker cabling.
i am looking for opinions/feedback from the many audiophiles on this forum who have actually heard bose without prejudice.
i have heard/seen a lot of people complain that bose doesn't publish technical specifications (but they do give ohms and amp wattage) or the small design of its cubic sattelites cannot deliver the full range or that bose uses cheap material.
but their fundamental philosophy is different right?
if sonus faber thinks that making a speaker in the shape of a musical instrument (lute), will make the sound as natural/lifelife as possible, bose focuses on what it defines as psychoacoustics : "the spatial properties of the radiated sound in typical listening spaces (homes and apartments) and the implications of spatiality for psychoacoustics, i.e. the listener's head as a sonic diffraction object as part of the system".
that is its own unique perspective which is radically different from the way audio is approached by other companies.
so little surprise that people who are conditioned to the dynamics of what passes for hifi with most industry products, cannot relate to the fundamental philosophy of bose.
once in an audio showroom in new york, the sales guy told me that you cannot get the full body of the sound from such tiny speakers. but in a bose system, the acoustimass unit which is wrongly identified as a bass unit, actually delivers the midrange. it is a different design not only from the conventional speaker design, but also other small speaker companies like gallo, orb, pinnacle etc whose bass unit is precisely what they claim it to be - a subwoofer.
another complaint is that the material used for speakers is cheap. but i am not sure how valid such an argument is because the material used for the top on a gibson es 335 guitar (one of the most expensive guitars) is actually plywood. gibson deliberately uses this because it gives the 335 its unique tone. but i do fantasize how a bose system would sound with say aluminium sattelites. likewise with better speaker cabling.
i am looking for opinions/feedback from the many audiophiles on this forum who have actually heard bose without prejudice.
Last edited:
Midrange needs to come from a driver which is positioned in the same axis as your ear.
in my living room), I only have to say Bose is more about convenience , comfort and is not aiming for an audiophile enthusiast tweak tool. As the OP says Psychoustics play a fundamental role in our systems , and if it sounds good than why not.