Living room speakers dilemma

fragpic

Active Member
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
150
Points
43
Location
Hyderabad
I got a Samsung 64E8000 TV for my living room and along with it I got a HT-E450K Home Theater.I hooked it up and the sound was pretty good.But they are 5.1 speakers of which I can use only 2.1 as I cannot and do not want to install the rear speakers(no place,looks ugly on the wall).Even in 2.1 mode I am pretty satisfied with the output.

Here is my issue:
One of my friend wanted a HT for himself so he requested me to sell this to him for 12K.I will surely never use the player nor the center and rear speakers,so is it a good idea to sell them to him and get myself a good set of 2.1 speakers for that cash?
I just want the sound to be as good as the E450K in 2.1 mode if not better.
What options do I have?
I am looking and 2.0 Bookshelves,2.1 Speakers and also sound bars.

Please help me out
 
A 2.1 system can never create true surround sound. Now, in your case, you are clearly not inclined to setup rear surround speakers because of aesthetics and looks. In this case, you could sell your HTiB and settle for a 2.1 active system or even a soundbar.
 
A 2.1 system can never create true surround sound. Now, in your case, you are clearly not inclined to setup rear surround speakers because of aesthetics and looks. In this case, you could sell your HTiB and settle for a 2.1 active system or even a soundbar.

Yes,I dont want the surround.
I just want the sound to be better and louder than my TV.
So can you suggest any good ones at 15K max...
 
Check out a pair of Cinema 100 v4 from Paradigm- They run about Rs 18,000 for the pair. Excellent reviews
 
2.1 Setup for 15K

I need a 2.1 setup which will be connected to my TV via Optical out.
I think I will definitely be needing a sub woofer as I would be watching movies occasionally.
My main acquirement for this is to have good and loud enough sound(I am an audio newbie so I cannot describe it any better).

So please suggest any good setup.
Is it better to get the subwoofer separate from the speakers?
Should I get an amplifier??

Here are a few sets I found:
Klipsch ProMedia 2.1
Edifier C3
A pair of JBL Control 1 and an accompanying subwoofer
Logitech Z623
 
Re: 2.1 Setup for 15K

You don't mention the size of the room or other factors in installing a system, but I will assume you want to start with a modest budget. First, there is scant difference to the ear between optical connections and good old copper wire. Optical is easier if you contemplate 5.1 or 7.1 sound, simply because the single optical cable will handle all discrete channels.

Most people get a receiver (with many inputs) to amplifiy the sound for home theater situations. This also allows listening to radio, MP3, DVD & Blu-ray. To find a 2.1 receiver you would need a wayback machine to go way back in time.

For computers there are units like the Logitech Z series that do have optical input, and sound passable. this might be the unit for you. It is simple and compact. There is no high end sound coming from the speakers, but if the source is television, there is probably no high end sound going in.

Here is the most important part. Your hearing. We all have different response to sound stimuli, and use should accept no higher authority as to what sounds good than your own ears. You need to listen to each candidate for consideration and pick the one you like.

I see nothing wrong with any of the units you mention. I even have a Logitech set in my garage to watch football while working on cars. Let your ears select the speakers for you.
 
Re: 2.1 Setup for 15K

which is the subwoofer with control 1 ?

I actually meant a subwoofer separately purchased.
I don't know which one I should get.


You don't mention the size of the room or other factors in installing a system, but I will assume you want to start with a modest budget. First, there is scant difference to the ear between optical connections and good old copper wire. Optical is easier if you contemplate 5.1 or 7.1 sound, simply because the single optical cable will handle all discrete channels.

Most people get a receiver (with many inputs) to amplifiy the sound for home theater situations. This also allows listening to radio, MP3, DVD & Blu-ray. To find a 2.1 receiver you would need a wayback machine to go way back in time.

For computers there are units like the Logitech Z series that do have optical input, and sound passable. this might be the unit for you. It is simple and compact. There is no high end sound coming from the speakers, but if the source is television, there is probably no high end sound going in.

Here is the most important part. Your hearing. We all have different response to sound stimuli, and use should accept no higher authority as to what sounds good than your own ears. You need to listen to each candidate for consideration and pick the one you like.

I see nothing wrong with any of the units you mention. I even have a Logitech set in my garage to watch football while working on cars. Let your ears select the speakers for you.

So will a computer unit be sufficient? Will they provide loud enough sound?
Source will not be standard TV only,I watch HQ Blu-ray rips played via the TV.I just don't need the surround that's all.
I cannot audition these computer speakers and have to buy them solely based on reviews.
I was actually looking for active speakers which would eliminate the need for an amp.
The size of the room is pretty huge but as I said it is only for watching occasional movies and TV,I will be sitting right in front of it.
Could you suggest any good subwoofer that can accompany a pair of bookshelf speakers?Budget is 5K
Will these car audio subwoofers work for my requirement?
 
Last edited:
I bought a pair of QAcoustics 2010i bookshelf speakers for 15k in a 2.0 format. Dont feel the need for Centre or Subwoofer yet as the sound is pretty good via my Denon AVR-1713. Best is you go to a reputed AV shop and try out speakers in your budget first.
 
I bought a pair of QAcoustics 2010i bookshelf speakers for 15k in a 2.0 format. Dont feel the need for Centre or Subwoofer yet as the sound is pretty good via my Denon AVR-1713. Best is you go to a reputed AV shop and try out speakers in your budget first.

Are they loud enough to deliver the thump needed for movies??
Do you need to pair it with a dac or amp??
Which one do you use?
 
Are they loud enough to deliver the thump needed for movies??
Do you need to pair it with a dac or amp??
Which one do you use?

They are pretty good, I have listened to a whole range of movies & music & so far dont feel a need to add a centre or subwoofer. I have a Denon AVR-1713. But do an audition to be sure, and room size / layout does matter. I have an L-shaped layout, so this is the best I could do anyway. See below

http://www.hifivision.com/home-theater/36505-chose-denon-avr-1713-a-3.html
 
They are pretty good, I have listened to a whole range of movies & music & so far dont feel a need to add a centre or subwoofer. I have a Denon AVR-1713. But do an audition to be sure, and room size / layout does matter. I have an L-shaped layout, so this is the best I could do anyway. See below

http://www.hifivision.com/home-theater/36505-chose-denon-avr-1713-a-3.html

But I cannot invest that much money on an AVR.
This will be a temporary arrangement for 1 year or so until the funds for a full blown HT are arranged.
 
But I cannot invest that much money on an AVR.
This will be a temporary arrangement for 1 year or so until the funds for a full blown HT are arranged.

So then I guess soundbar is the best option that you later just sell when you move to full HT or use in the bedroom. There is a Boston acoustics soundbar on HiFi mart that is decent.

Otherwise you will have to buy active speakers that dont need an AMP/AVR which will anyway not be future proof..

Or if you are sure of going for a full HT later anyway, u can start buy buying an AVR and 2.0 speakers now, but that will need at least 45k budget.
 
A beautiful, well-constructed speaker with class-leading soundstage, imaging and bass that is fast, deep, and precise.
Back
Top