Its done!![]()
I've never heard it personally but read several good things about it on the net...Also got a wholehearted recommendation for it from one of our resident gurus here...Bhagwan...
You may wanna ping him...hopefully he sees this thread and posts his views in detail...
These are reviews - so not to go by what they say - but for the price - what you get - imho is too good.CONCLUSION
A DAC is far more than merely the sum of its parts. There's no shortage of new releases using all the latest chips and packing all the latest buzzwords. But that doesn't mean they compete with the real deal---there's just no substitute for proper design and implementation. Making purchasing decisions based purely on chips and specs has a good chance of leaving a person disappointed. The Parasound Zdac is a great example of this, it doesn't use a cutting edge DAC chip or USB receiver, yet it manages to transcend the limits of what I expect from the average $500 DAC.
In summary, the Zdac looks, feels, and sounds like it could be a $1000 unit. It certainly didn't feel out of place in my rack with numerous competitors in that range. As a DAC, the Zdac offers exemplary performance with practically zero downside unless we count the lack of support for sample rates above 96kHz. As a headphone amp it could use a few tweaks, but still manages to sound excellent with the right headphones. Do I recommend it? Yes! Rather strongly at that.
Again - quotes from the Review - I would take it with a 'pinch of salt' !The Zdac replaced a more expensive Bladelius DAC and the system sounded noticeably better with the Parasound in place. I have to agree with Michael Lavorgna when he called the Bladelius unit somewhat lean---the Zdac seemed to add a good dose of oomph and gusto where prior there had been very little.
Catalog Sales men..... and then they lament that local audiophiles dont buy from them, but simply survey the 'net for the lowest price.:sad:
Catalog Sales men..... and then they lament that local audiophiles dont buy from them, but simply survey the 'net for the lowest price.:sad: