Smart glasses or creepy idea sold as a desirable lifestyle product?

The less recognised problem with any tech that collects our data (including our images) in these times is that we have no control over who uses them and how it will be used.
 
But who cares?
We have been using Myspace, Orkut, Facebook, Instagram, ...
There's a difference. We share only what we choose to share on Social Media. And that too, not all of our content is given public visibility. And even that, many of us share cautiously, expecting that what's out there (regardless of the assigned visibility) is as good as public.

There are many people who value their privacy. They don't relish having their life (private moments or not) made publicly available.
 
There's a difference. We share only what we choose to share on Social Media. And that too, not all of our content is given public visibility. And even that, many of us share cautiously, expecting that what's out there (regardless of the assigned visibility) is as good as public.

There are many people who value their privacy. They don't relish having their life (private moments or not) made publicly available.
Nicely expressed!
I think @alpha1 alludes to the situation that most people are oblivious to the way their data is being used by big tech companies.

However putting a camera on glasses and trying to normalise it as a desirable lifestyle is a bit different from us voluntarily sharing our information and visuals On social media?
 

"An investigation by the Swedish news outlets Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) and Goteborgs-Posten (GP) is expected to put regulators on alert after it was reported that Meta’s contract workers saw extremely private and graphic content captured by wearers of Meta’s AI smart glasses."

"According to their report from late February, these contract workers, who sift through videos for data annotation purposes, saw content including sensitive bank information, naked people, sexual encounters, pornography, and even toilet visits."

I suppose this would fall in the category of user error (the users simply forgot the glasses were recording), if the camera in the glasses was simply not on all the time (like our phone microphones sending "anonymized voice data"). * shrug *

I find the potential exposure of passwords and bank data to be more concerning, really.
 
These glasses can see bank and other passwords and everything the wearer sees too?

Shrugs maybe are all that we can do for now as we slide down the slippery slope of blindly accepting and even glorifying every new “tech innovation without safeguards on privacy.

At least till a sensational scandal involving the “not so smart glasses” erupts and then a knee jerk reaction of bans and moral posturing will ensue.

It’s distressingly banal
 
In the future maintaining privacy at a personal level will be a major issue with these nosy companies keeping tabs on people's behaviour.
 
The new IT bill is supposed to protect our right to privacy?
The Supreme Court has said this too I think.
So, Both constitutional and legal safeguards exist
 
Meta Workers Reveal Some Of The Disturbing Things They’ve Seen Through Users’ Smart Glasses.

The investigation by the Swedish news outlets Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten revealed that employees at a Kenya-based subcontractor, Sama, were viewing private footage recorded by Meta glasses.

The videos often included highly personal and sensitive content, including nudity, bank details, private chats, and even moments of physical intimacy.

 
Wharfedale Linton Heritage Speakers in Red Mahogany finish at a Special Offer Price. BUY now before the price increase.
Back
Top