Big brands line Rayban, slick marketing and a tech billionaire with a record of profiting from manipulating social behavior all have come together to push “smart glasses” as a desirable lifestyle choice …
Exactly. The problem is very few care…till a sensational scandal happens and then suddenly everyone caresBut who cares?
We have been using Myspace, Orkut, Facebook, Instagram, ...
There's a difference. We share only what we choose to share on Social Media. And that too, not all of our content is given public visibility. And even that, many of us share cautiously, expecting that what's out there (regardless of the assigned visibility) is as good as public.But who cares?
We have been using Myspace, Orkut, Facebook, Instagram, ...
Nicely expressed!There's a difference. We share only what we choose to share on Social Media. And that too, not all of our content is given public visibility. And even that, many of us share cautiously, expecting that what's out there (regardless of the assigned visibility) is as good as public.
There are many people who value their privacy. They don't relish having their life (private moments or not) made publicly available.
"An investigation by the Swedish news outlets Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) and Goteborgs-Posten (GP) is expected to put regulators on alert after it was reported that Meta’s contract workers saw extremely private and graphic content captured by wearers of Meta’s AI smart glasses."
"According to their report from late February, these contract workers, who sift through videos for data annotation purposes, saw content including sensitive bank information, naked people, sexual encounters, pornography, and even toilet visits."
www.zdnet.com