I have contemplated it. However, the Quad S5s weigh approx 28 kgs each and not conducive to being handled by a lone person due to their shape. I’ll have to find that jobless friend to help out... however, i do expect the bass response and other elements to improve as all my other bookshelves including the BA A26 benefit immensely from being placed in this secondary position.
Very interesting. Would be interesting to see if you have a suckout happening at that position under 60 hz. Your observation with the sub in the same location pretty much corroborates it.
Those dedicated bass drivers and passive radiators for bass in the Quad should theoretically play much better bass. Maybe you should try them in the same location where you have the Q350's located now to test this out.
So i just measured the q350 and the initial suspicion that bass frequencies between 40 and 60hz being sucked out is confirmed as it shows the same sharp roll off at 60hz but picks up again at 40hz. However, while the response is near identical at 60hz, the difference is nearly 14db at 40 hz which means that the kef q350s dip deeper much more effectively than the S5s irrespective of the suckout. However, it seems mid bass punch of the Quad S5 is better, quite opposite to the initial suspicion that it'd be the Q350s being better in this respect.
