That is your opinion and I fully respect it. Just to give some personal opinions, I belong to that camp which does not believe in auditioning in the same system, synergy etc as far as a source like CD player is concerned. It makes perfect sense to do that, for example, an amplifier-speaker combine where the speaker is the transducer changing the electrical energy to sound by mechanical means and the output to a great extent depends on how good the amplifier is able to control the speaker drivers.
As far as a source like CDP is conerned, it is the origin of everything and defines the boundaries of what you will hear from the speakers at the end of the link and so the source determines the resolution, timing, etc etc. I have also heard the Resolution Audio in different systems but never felt that it was lean, of course, my experience.
It is like writing an examination paper. Whether you use a Pilot or Parker or Dunhill or Cross pen, how good is your bond paper, what ultimately matters are the contents of what is finally written on the paper. This is determined by what is in the brain and as long as the contents of the brain are limited, the same will appear on the paper no matter how good the pen or paper is or how smooth the hand-pen-paper coordination is. As long as you don't know the answer to the question, it doesn't matter on the rest.
So some insights into the design of the CDP, quality of components used etc greatly help in its choice. I too had an Arcam CD-192 which is an excellent player but has its own limitations in design and quality, and when moving to a Ayre, I could notice the differences. I thought the Resolution Audio with its concept of 2-box design to keep the noisy and digital circuits separate sounded very well in whatever system I heard.
cheers.
murali
Yea, it could be a matter of taste.