While the idea of a trial period for electronics may seem appealing on the surface, it presents significant challenges for both sellers and buyers. Sellers face financial risks, logistical complexities, and potential damage to their products. Buyers may not have enough time to evaluate the electronics properly and might inadvertently misuse or damage them during the trial. It is human, a trial will encourage impulsive buying behavior. Buyers might be tempted to try out multiple electronic devices with the intention of returning all but one. This not only puts added stress on retailers but also leads to unnecessary returns and wastage, which is bound to get accounted in the price increase of the products making them out of reach. The maturity of a market also influences the availability of trial windows. More mature markets may have established norms and practices, including the provision of trial periods, while markets like India may have different priorities and preferences. IMO, More than the trial window, we should collectively voice out the disparity in warranty terms. Why US / EU purchased items not covered under warranty here, why warranty period different here when compared to west. I believe this discussion needs a separate thread of its own