I tried it without the hub. I definitely prefer the hub. I guess the sms200 with the tx-ushub would have performance approaching the ultra which is supposed to have a better clock. I am looking into getting the tx-USbultra. Regardless of my experience with the sms200 I have had great results from the sotm usb hubs and the usb cards, both my computers use either the tx-usb hub or the internal tx-usbexp.Well the tx-usbhub costs approx $350 to the $450 for the sms200, so maybe the clock in that is better, hence their recommendation. Also they have their tx-usb ultra which at $900 is highly regarded and perhaps will sound better than the tx-usbhub (I have been told by a friend who uses this as part of music pc, that the sound is very analog like).
Cheers,
Sid
Cheers,
Sid
 
	 
  
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 ), is it likely that any spurious electrical based noise can travel along the cat6 to the sotm 200 due to use of a wall wart at the router and if so will it adversely effect the performance of the sotm 200?  Not sure what type of  signals other than data travel along cat6 cables.  Note this was a similar discussion to usb cables early on, and since then we have seen many remedies to this i.e; detaching the power part of usb cable, 2 headed usb cables etc.
), is it likely that any spurious electrical based noise can travel along the cat6 to the sotm 200 due to use of a wall wart at the router and if so will it adversely effect the performance of the sotm 200?  Not sure what type of  signals other than data travel along cat6 cables.  Note this was a similar discussion to usb cables early on, and since then we have seen many remedies to this i.e; detaching the power part of usb cable, 2 headed usb cables etc.  
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		