Congrats. :clapping:
I also get 60-70 mBps while copying from Desktop-PC to NAS. That's acceptable speed. I filled my 8-9 TB earlier than I had thought.
Please share your experience once you explore it.
Filling up that much data is quite fast indeed. Regarding the data transfer rate and to achieve higher speeds from PC to NAS there are many factors involved. As per my knowledge goes the max data transfer rate with GbE network is about 125MBPS (1000/8bits=125), purely theoretically. Getting around 100MBPS speed is considered as excellent but getting that speed depends on factors like hard drive spin rate (RPM), PCIe bandwidth (on PC), Network cabling, operating system used, electrical interference, etc. The main bottleneck is the hard drive spin rate. As most of us are using a drive with 5400 & 5900 RPM the transfer rate will not go beyond 75MBPS. I did some benchmark with transferrring data and I achieved...
File Size: 4.37GB
Time taken to copy from PC -> NAS - 1:20secs Avg transfer rate: 56MBPS (peak 70, least 45)
Time taken to copy from NAS -> PC - 51secs Avg transfer rate: 88MBPS (peak 95, least 70)
It clearly shows that pulling data from the NAS is much faster rather than pushing. Yes, if a 7200 RPM HDD is used one may see a little bump in speeds, but more heat and power consumption. If one tries transferring data from a ssd->ssd or a RAM Drive->RAM Drive, one may get speeds past 100MBPS. Haven't tried though, as my other PC & laptop does not have a gigabit port, has a 100megabit port.
My experience in a separate post.
What's the power consumption on this device? The specs on Netgear's website indicate 45W which is rather good, but does the power comsumption go up with additional HDD's?
Also, there are quite a few reviews on Amazon.com indicating that the Plex app does not transcode HD video well (CPU not able to keep up) and so on, plus reports of drives going missing after some time. Any feedback from FM's who have had this thing a while?
One last question, the box does look rather large in the pictures but the dimensions on the Netgear site indicate a rather svelte unit. Pictures with a reference scale would be much appreciated.
The power consumption on this NAS box is quite as specified on the website. At full load with 1 HDD (5900 RPM, 7 watts full load) it consumes 25-27watts, the 45watts mentioned on the website is with full load with 4x4 HDD's attached and spinning together.
Haven't tried Plex app yet, but I'm sure that this NAS does not support transcoding on the fly, you may have to look at the big brother RN314 which also has a HDMI port and has an x86 processor. Price is somewhere close to 35K.
Yes online reviews on amazon and newegg does not look good for this unit. May be George who I think is using this unit for a long time to give the feedback how does this perform and any of the issues that he may have come across as reported by some users on these sites.
Thanks
45W should be fully loaded. It would be too high a power consumption if only NAS box needed that much.
There are bad reports about virtually every NAS product out there. When I was taking my plunge, I went with Buffalo based on real experience of talking to their sales rep (who sounded knowledgeable about their product) and less number of complaints on Internet.
A NAS box can sometimes be a miss or hit. Specially once you start using all of it's promised functions. As a simple cloud storage most NASs work without glitches though. Drives going missing would be too bad, specially for not-so-tech-savvy users. Despite all my care, I have lost some data while swapping drives (my own carelessness). So this is definitely something worrisome. But in the end all NAS products have their share of negative reports on Internet. Pick your poison.
The rate at which the said NAS box is available right now, I'd say grab it while it lasts. I couldn't find similar price in other markets.
PS: Some Netgear NAS can have their RAM upgraded, which helps with tasks such as downloading, media streaming. With default amount of RAM, not much should be expected.
Indeed, the reviews on the internet are not favorable at the moment and there are more negatives than positives, but if one sticks to what this NAS can do, I feel he will be happy with it. For the price, its working great as a multi-usage NAS. Lot more details discussed in a separate post.
RAM cannot be upgraded in the 100 series of ReadyNAS products.
One thing I wanted to mention (as I learnt the hard way)...depending on the configuration that you want to have do think about how many drives you put in initially and how you set it up right from the start. My data is backed up externally on HDDs. So I wanted to set the volumes up as individual volumes in FLEXRAID. I thought I would be able to add HDDs as I needed, but being a newbie, I did not know that to configure the NAS drives in JBOD you need to have the total set of drives populated (if that is the way you intend to use the NAS). On the other hand if you do want redundancy for your data - which is probably the most common way of configuring the NAS - then the default xRAID2 is very useful.
@Saketb: If you leave the default XRAID2 then the second disc you add will automatically copy the contents of the first drive for data protection. Then the third and fourth added become storage drives. The good thing about the single-volume architecture of XRAID2 is that it allows you to add additional drives without reformatting your drives and having to move your data somewhere else. You can continue to use the NAS while you do the needful to increase your volume capacity.
Very true, currently with 1 drive in the NAS, its formatted as JBOD and once I insert another drive it re-builds itself to XRAID2 with redundancy. Further drives will give volume expansion and space and that is the reason I wanted to go with the highest compatible hard drive. I plan on putting 3x4TB drives at a later stage so that I will get a total capacity of 11.022TB from 4x4TB drives.