It depends entirely on how unique a speakers concept is and how interesting or different the sound it produces is.
For example take ZU omen. Exceptional value for money and performance featuring a 10" fullrange driver which is a very unique contribution to $1-2000 price bracket and can run off a INR 4000 amplifier if need be without sacrificing too much on fidelity.
I would gladly take that omen over a dali ikon because it has the potential to offer something
different. In that difference lies the power of giant killers. Not the zu specifically, but the concept that deviates from the masses.
For example take a midbass metal driver that people in their right senses would never crossover beyond 2000hz, a handful of designers cross them over at 2300-2500hz. Even a small thing like that offers that small deviation that can make a speaker special for someone and crap for another.
Also as a rule I will never buy a speaker new or at retail value. I will just use it as a measuring tool in my search for one in the used market. Buying a new speaker is a potential waste of money in my eyes but if one can afford to, why not I suppose.
Anyone who reads one liners and buys something because was said is 'the best' in sound on a review written by a person other than the person reading it, deserves to throw their money at that product and have it go to waste. Because the marketing effort has succeeded (don't take offence to this, it's just a thought)
The truth of any review lies in their observations, not their assessment. 
I feel you should audition more speakers before you decide.