@Life spill, I was wondering what happened to your quest? Hope you found a good solution.
I recently came across this succinct write up:
https://robbreport.com/gear/audio/vacuum-tube-amps-remerging-1234797622/
If you didn't know any better, you would read that above article
and you would take the two suggestions as a solution.
A WE 300B tube and a MAC 275.
In reality, you will be less-than-optimally using your money and listening time........... in my experience.
IMHO, the MAC 275 has always been their poorer performer in their amp line up. Popular with the buying public, but under-performing !! THE MAC amp of a consumer-type to covet and own, ( there is one best, that has been / and always is ), is a pair of MAC 60 monos. THEN, you have something good. Something to covet.
One thing ( to me ) very interesting about the MAC 60 monoblock is it uses TWO 5U4GB tube rectifiers.
It was the ONLY consumer level amp in the MAC line up, to do so. Gee, that has to do with low DCR rectification and the power supply. Wow, since mid-2019, I only use
two 5U4GBs. Very few other amps' designs do.
You will discover such information, about MAC 60 monos, probably
only from older and and the most-experienced audiophiles, 70 years of age or higher.
There IS one other MAC amp, mono, designed by Frank McIntosh himself, that is
really really great. It is the HUGE MAC MI-200, an industrial amplifier used for Gold Mining Shaker Tables, etc etc. It has many tube rectifiers, many chassis, many totally separate power supplies, and many Watts.
The above-post's
referred-to article, would
lead someone to buy the latest generation MAC 275, for many thousands and thousands of dollars, ( rupees, pounds, etc. ) and likely one would have an average-performing audio piece !! Especially VS a pair of 1950's MAC 60 monos . But
am I able to mention this, when
paying HFV advertisers may be selling current MAC 275 s? It occurs to me, a conflict exists.
The 1938 WE 300B triode tube, reproduced in 2023, is another suggested choice I would
not be too excited about.
Look at it's internal construction. Do we still have non symmetrically shaped and suspended filaments, non symmetrical grids and plates? I am not sure.
No longer made EIMAC transmitting tubes, with
symmetrical round grids, round plates, typically sound superior to vintage WE 300Bs, etc. Yup, an EIMAC 75TL. A 300B is very popular, world-wide. The 300B is ideal ( IMHO ) for someone who " doesn't fully get it " with speakers ( 100-101 dB or higher) and is thus forced to compromise and use a clumsy 8 Watt output DHT !!!!!
One can DIY build a triple 6005 amp, (
not even a triode tube ), spend $10.00 times three for output tubes , or $30.00 USD, and beat any $1,500 to $1,750 new manufacture WE 300B tube's audio performance. I mean outperform it easily. Coming up this year.
I am speaking solely now from my own audio experience. Amplifier under-performance is not necessarily a tube problem, but rather, more so resulting from the tube amp's overall design !!! This refers mostly to power supply and signal transfer efficiency, that nothing is overlooked. Jeff spent many decades with electrostats, inefficient speakers, large amps,
looking for the answer with no success, and lots of expense. Wasted years and wasted money.
In the late 1980s, I
started getting "on track" with RCA Cinema gear ( MI-1428Bs, Ubangies ). Since 2015, I use a more modest all-ALTEC system : 802s, 515Bs, 825s. It all
begins, with your speaker choice. Only then, can someone employ the tube amp - close to ideally.
In 2023, I am changing from
101dB 515
Bs............
to 104.5 dB 515
G-8HPs, measured in VOTT enclosures. A step up as I hear it, .....lower distortion, improved dynamics, better diction on opera.
This above is just my experience ......... just a developed opinion. YMMV, fine !!! To each his own. We all live, and hopefully, learn. Have fun !!
Jeff