"Burn in" was more likely to happen to a CRT TVs. Infact most CRT tvs were rough used despite the permanent burn in risks as people were not aware of burn in risks. With OLEDs having light emitting diodes or emissive technology, Samsung and a few others are the culprits(surprisingly, the few others I mean are just the salesmen in stores pushing for QLED or FALD over OLED painting the fear of burn ins). Plasma TV which died because of higher electricity consumption being a repulsive marketing campaign may indicate OLED also retire soon because of the permanent image retention label they have created. But OLED was endorsed by Sony too on time second of the big three, hence the technology prevails. Samsung which beats around the bush too hard stopped blaming OLED technology in recent times as they advocate a derivative technology in their cell phone screens (AMOLED). Burn ins are possible only if repeat content is played for a very loooooong time over and over without letting it's inbuilt trouble shooting mechanisms not fend for itself - like a display set displaying same contents for a year non stop.
Before you decide on the OLED, do identify whether you are a contrast person i.e. someone who values shadow detail, or somebody who prefers brightness/luminosity i.e. bright and punchy pictures, especially during HDR playback.
) but only time will tell whether these concerns have any basis.disagree with pretty much everything you wrote about oled.Before you decide on the OLED, do identify whether you are a contrast person i.e. someone who values shadow detail, or somebody who prefers brightness/luminosity i.e. bright and punchy pictures, especially during HDR playback.
Another thing to consider is that while OLEDs look great with good/great quality content, the gains are less palpable if the content (such as most videos on youtube barring those with high production budgets) isnt stellar.
Case in point, i got myself an LG G1 and i found its brightness to be underwhelming, especially in the context of flagship TVs, so much so that i had to immediately go buy an LCD TV (with full array backlight dimming and over 1600nits of maximum brightness) to compensate for what i was lacking.
Again, colours typically look better on an OLED but unless you do a side by side comparo, most people cannot tell.
However, the picture quality in a good LCD stands out immediately and gives immediate gratification, at least in my experience and based upon a focus group consisting of some friends. Again, this due to its much higher brightness/luminosity compared to OLEDs.
With respect to burn in, the OLED does give me sleepless nights (because i leave the TV running while sleeping
Lastly, do check out the new samsung mini LED tvs. Their black/shadow performance is supposedly only marginally behind that of OLEDs while its brightness is in a whole different league which OLEDs simply can't match up in any way, shape or form.
If i'm not mistaken, 2022 models will land in stores some months into the year, not in Jan itself.
This is my exact situation, a big transparent 6 by 8 foot Fenesta door (living room balcony entrance) directly facing my TV, which makes my room immensely bright with natural light during the day.
With proper usage you don’t have to worry much about Oled burn in. If you want a Tv with the best picture quality in terms accuracy nothing beats Oled and is the best tv tech out there in the market. But one thing to consider is your usage pattern and room. I have a c9 and use it for a dedicated HT room which is pitch dark. In such an environment you can clearly see the magic of Oled and why it’s way superior to any led tv’s out there. Put it in a bright room and watch some trash contents the purpose is lost and it’s no more then an inferior led tv with less brightness.
So you like specs, sorta like top trumps. Whatever floats ones boat i guess. Subjectivity be damned.
What are you talking about my friend? What reflections?
No debate there. However, if you want the brightest OLED , go for the G1 since the A90J is not available in India.
Unless it's the 6 series of 8 series, avoid
I thought you preferred Sony,Samsung or LG. What’s your budget, screen size preference and what type of contents do you watch. If you are ok with budget brands then then MI 75 also have a good number of satisfied users in the forum.Check out the MI thread for more information. You will find a lot of misguided comments like the one above on oleds who have no idea on what picture quality is or who have 0 knowledge on 4k HDR. Just have a look at the tv shoot out and use this just as a reference and not as absolute. You will know what are all the parameters that make a good tv and what each techs excel over each other. FYI the sony mastering monitor which is the reference level display for all professionals is an OLED display. Choose what suits you best.
without going into tech.......if its pure picture quality that rocks your boat, it really is a no brainer...OLED!!! they talk about brightness or 400-500nits not being bright enough. I find my Lg OLED C1 extremely bright and actually need to turn it down. Yes, many will talk about Samsung QLEDs, which I also own one, BUT OLED is king!
I need atleast 65" and would prefer 75". budget is 1 lakh. Mostly D2H contents.
65" OLED from Sony or LG for 1L is going to be tough.... but not impossible.
Then Oled doesn’t make sense at all. Any decent led tv will be good enough for D2H contents. IMO Oled is best used as a home theatre display for watching 4k contents in a dark room. For 1L budget it’s difficult for 75inch and if you extend your budget by 20-30K you can get the MI 75 which many in forum use and are happy with.
