I read a few paragraphs before I got bored, the person who wrote it sounds like he's full of it to me. In any case, I prefer recorded, recreated, amplified music to live music (ie through speakers). Live music bores me. There is no warmth or tone (and way too much HF), it's just a mix of sounds with no real melody that can be attained with studio mixing, which is much more perfect in my opinion, I am of course talking about live music without any amplification or mics, and these seem to be rare. These days most live music is also amplified at concerts, assuming even that the musicians are actually playing instead of a lip sync. These sorts of events I find to be far too dynamic and artificial, these especially lack warmth as often the engineer in charge of the sounds overdoes it with clarity at the expense of musicality. Just my humble opinion of course. I'd like to note that I do appreciate live singing (unamplified), unaccompanied by instruments, professional or otherwise. But given the choice, always studio produced music. As a final note, the sound of the breeze and the sort can be appreciated sometimes when one is in such a frame of mind but I don't equate it to music. There may be more in the link but a few paragraphs were more than enough for me to understand it isn't for me.