Hello and Welcome to HiFiVision.com - an online community for the home entertainment and tech enthusiasts!
If you would like to ask a question, participate in a discussion and view attachments please Register yourself.
Not quite. Paul claims this, but Ethan does not look at individual parameters at all. He takes the whole damn signal - which includes ALL parameters.It is actually about 2 gentlemen arguing whether all parameters that contributes to audio quality can be measured or not.
The argument posed by "believers" was that we yet do not know everything that constitutes a signal. We do not know every parameter in a signal that affects sound. Ergo, we are not measuring everything that needed to be measured. Ethan doesn't go down to parameter level at all. He takes the lumped signal.This argument has been raging for a long time. Nothing new about it.
(Of commenting on the limitation of his "Null Device" thereby affecting it's sales)
What made you think that I didn't. Listen to what Paul had said about the null box. That's what I think what it is.Please see the video to understand why Ethan built the 'Null Tester' device. It was to demonstrate, not to sell to the general public. He sells stuff, but those are all things related to room treatments.
My personal experience.What are you backing Paul on?
What people are looking fpr is the Blue pill (the diamond shaped one)
I asked "what you are backing Paul on" and not "based on what are you backing Paul on". I think you misunderstood the Q.My personal experience