Yes. Its Mid level at best. My gear is present in my sig. And my DAc prior to this was the onboard ALC886 of my Asus M5a97 mobo.
After few days of listening, I have noticed a difference. 100$ worth of difference? i cant tell.
I guess they have different ICs, I meant similar. I came to this conclusion based on price and a few review videos i saw on youtube.
...This basically is the same tech as the schiit modi 2 uber. Exactly the same. Only thing is that the modi is made in USA, it would be costlier to import, hence this decision.
DAC sound grows on you and soon you should start getting that better defined bass, little refinement in treble, mid range becoming more natural sounding if the SML is better in than Modi.
+1 .. often changes in system goes unnoticed during the initial hearings. After spending sometime with the new one, if you go back to the older one, then you will vividly understand the change - better or worse.
I thought you said this ...
Anyway, that doesn't matter any way. The things which matter is quality. The Chinese are cheap and US are costlier, always, and you thought it is for no reason?
Components available in mouser, partsconexion, digikey and costlier than Chinese counterparts for no reason?![]()
I get it. But isn't that the placebo effect? Rather than actual change. Honestly i can hear the difference moving from onboard to a mid level DAC. But how much better 'for real' can it get with a 2000$ dac? I have never heard one. So can't tell. I can only guess as of now.
put a $100 dac on a high end system. and then put on a $2000 dac. and you will hear the difference
Now, i was kinda worried that i just got fooled by the 'audiophile' hype<snip>my speakers are not placed properly!
put a $100 dac on a high end system. and then put on a $2000 dac. and you will hear the difference
More likely than not, No.
Not if like in post no 1 on thread
ciao
gr
You will always hear a difference, no doubt about it.
I get it. But isn't that the placebo effect? Rather than actual change. Honestly i can hear the difference moving from onboard to a mid level DAC. But how much better 'for real' can it get with a 2000$ dac? I have never heard one. So can't tell. I can only guess as of now.
Actually, this sort of thing is very common with me. I hear all this rave (raving) feedback from various sources about how good something sounds and I go in with a lot of expectations thinking this will change my world. When it actually happens the difference is often so subtle as to be non existent and then I go - WTF are they talking about!! This has happened tons of times with me. If you complain about not feeling the earth move then you will have someone saying how your equipment is just not good enough or "resolving" enough for you to hear the difference. The reality is that these days the law of diminishing returns kicks off much much early. An example: I recently heard a $15 Class D amp paired with a $25 tube pre-amp (ebay stuff) and then heard exactly the same upstream/downstream equipment with the amplification replaced with a $1000 integrated amp. To my ears there was a small difference with the edge going to the eBay Chinese stuff. Maybe that makes me and my ears non audiophile but that's the way it often is for me.
Actually, this sort of thing is very common with me. I hear all this rave (raving) feedback from various sources about how good something sounds and I go in with a lot of expectations thinking this will change my world. When it actually happens the difference is often so subtle as to be non existent and then I go - WTF are they talking about!! This has happened tons of times with me. If you complain about not feeling the earth move then you will have someone saying how your equipment is just not good enough or "resolving" enough for you to hear the difference. The reality is that these days the law of diminishing returns kicks off much much early. An example: I recently heard a $15 Class D amp paired with a $25 tube pre-amp (ebay stuff) and then heard exactly the same upstream/downstream equipment with the amplification replaced with a $1000 integrated amp. To my ears there was a small difference with the edge going to the eBay Chinese stuff. Maybe that makes me and my ears non audiophile but that's the way it often is for me.
Edit: the only exception that I found to which the above is not applicable, IMO are speakers. If I were to advise someone on buying equipment it would be to buy inexpensive but decent sounding electronics BUT to buy the best sounding speakers that they can afford.
The placebo effect is real you know, people do get healed when taking sugar pills instead of real medicine. Call it faith or mind power, but numerous scientific studies have shown that the placebo effect is real and that it works.
The law of diminishing returns is pretty much spot on for anything priced over $3500-$4000. Pretty much anyone can achieve audio Nirvana for life with equipment in that price range. Any spending over that amount will only bring in incremental upgrades, and obviously there will always be folks willing to go that extra mile.
However, my contention is with "not hearing the difference". Everything makes a difference, either in sound quality, soundstage, sound signature, tone, detail (hearing or not hearing instruments), etc. This is easily evident and heard in pretty much any setup, even $50-$100 computer speakers.
Folks claiming to not hear any difference is untrue IMHO. Maybe they do not like what they hear or the additional spending is not worth the ROI, that I can understand. However, my experience has taught me that even the minutest change in equipment always results in a change in the sound itself. This is also true for video (totally unrelated in this context).
Its not about not hearing a difference (i speak only of DACs). No one denies that difference is pretty clear when it comes to speakers, amps, headphones, etc. But do people really see differences in tone and lows and highs? I find there is a difference in accentuated highs and better dynamic range. How can a dac do all that if its doing what its supposed to do... simply taking digital and converting to analogue while being loyal to the source material.
Big of you to admit that because not many here would have....I should also add, the differences between the small sample of DACs I have are subtle but definite...
The DAC to me, is what I guess a cartridge is to a vinyl buff. It is where it all happens. And the "loyalty" stuff too.
I have several crappy DACs and a couple of decent ones at home. If i were blindfold and hung upside down (that's an insane twist on a DBT) I am positive I can tell them apart. Bring out the thumbscrews and i am saying no different.
That would be at home. I may/ not be able to elsewhere, because while my system is by no means expensive or esoteric, I have invested thought and care in positioning my speakers, trying to fix the horror that is my room and so on. Without that , IMHO you are listening to two speakers, some electronics and the room you are in, not music, at any rate not music that is "reproduced true to the source" etyadi.
Now, but of course if you are happy with what you have, more the power and force to youif you are not there are several - cheap, easy things you can try to improve. better etc. There is lots of very useful and informative stuff here on hfv
It is ofc entirely possible that you already, and may have indeed implemented all of this.
I should also add, the differences between the small sample of DACs I have are subtle but definite. However they are apparent even to an indifferent listener (ie the type who really don't care if it were blaring off a temple ke baahar wala bhonpoo type speaker or something somewhat more expensive and hifi).
To those who want to listen, there is a lot more. If you want to believe that I am deluding myself, please be my guest. I know what I am buying next when upgraditis strikes is a DAC, sue me or smirk, I'm good either way
ciao
gr