J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Thad, I agree with you on Networking having known TCP/IP protocols well. But again in the past I have eaten crow with my views

I have heard Bhagwans system and it is truly state of the art as far as systems go..my system would never be able to reproduce the details in a spatial space the way that does and any microscopic differences are very apparent.

Knowing Bhagwans vast knowledge /experience i am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and hear from him as to what he feels...although i do not agree that it will make a difference and from reading his post even he is not sure..but wants to give it a try anyway

Sir,

To start - Thanks;
Appreciate the kind words.

Now imagine - from what you have heard - I have made changes & at this point I am 'excited'
For the number of years you have known me - have I ever been so vocal / euphoric ? I do not think so - therefore try to extrapolate what is going on;;;

On the Cable front - I have stated before & I am saying it again - I do not believe in the CAT 7 Ethernet Cable. Whether it will make a change or no - I have no idea. But this computer change has got me so +ve that I would be ready to try anything at this point in time...
Therefore the Risk / Gamble. It may just fire back on my face - but it is a risk I am taking... Let me see where it takes me;
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Is that so? Then I wonder why so many methods of playing back audio over a computer, internal sound card , external usb to spdif converters (entirely new category, not existent until 2 - 3 years ago) the one that Bhagwan is referring to....
No, sid, my first first decent sound card has tolslink digital in and out, and when I bought it, it was a good deal because the model was already obsolescent. I think that was about 2002 or 2003. I had minidsik stuff, and a CD player with S/PDIF output too, toslink and coax . According to something I read a couple of days ago, the S/PDIF was specified in the CD Red Book --- so, if that is the case, it is as old as CDs themselves.

Of course, USB was around then too, but USB1 was not taken seriously for sound. Firewire has been around, and was the choice of semi-pros and home studios --- and the choice of Apple, who I think invented it. My RME card, by the way, was father's-younger-brother to Bhagwan's card, and it gave me a similar experience to yours, putting my over-three-times-the-price Cyrus CD player to shame. Of course, 200 (but I got it half price) was considered a lot to spend on a sound card back then, except by the people who spent 1000 on a Lynx --- and I think you'll find them selling cards today that are pretty much the same, at least functionally, as the models they had on the market in the 2000s and perhaps earlier.

So this is not at all new, it is mature (although not entirely problem-free, but I suppose that goes for many technologies. It's not new, it is just that a lot of people never noticed it. There has been a huge prejudice against PCs as audio components. Many hifi folk never got as far as the prejudice: they never even considered it. It is good for PC audio now, that people such as you and Bhagwan are embracing it now: PC as high-end audio component. What needs to be understood, though, is the border between computer technology and audio technology. The places where data is absolutely and completely disengaged from content --- and the places where it is not. Where the data is content-irrelevant, then I ask the audio people to leave that the computer people: it is their department.

Also when I got into it for the first time for my hi-fi needs a couple of years ago, there was no easy method, I had to read a gazillion websites with a gazillion views on what was the best way to implement computer based audio into your hifi and each claimed their method sounded the best. Does not sound like a mature, decade old technology.
Easy method: insert sound card, load drivers if necessary, cable up and play. All the rest is seeking to get a little better, combined with unnecessary worries. In fact, the paper from the net that I used for guidance (don't know if it is still around, I don't think it ever had a proper home) might even have been based on W98! But heck, in those days we had to "optimise" a PC to make it a decent word processor!

(aside: Actually, I think PC audio was simpler then. I had fewer problems with my old early-Pentium machines than I have had with recent ones)

Of - course music from computer has been around, but Hi- fi, IMO is still nascent.
No: some of discovered the difference between a Soundblaster and an RME way back then.
I am getting ready to build a music pc to replace my laptop, but there is no one stop source to go and get one. I have to source everything and assemble it.
Have to? You choose to. Partly because it is probably the best way to get a PC anyway, and, perhaps, because you want the case to look right among your hifi gear. Sure, outside of a tiny, specialist market, people have not been selling music PCs. Now, of course, they will be building hifi boxes at hif prices, which are nothing but PCs inside. I think that at least one company is doing that, and a [previously] respected hifi name too!

To me hi- fi over pc sounds to be in the realm of early adopters
Again, a man here has been doing it for over ten years. Because it is new to some does not mean it is new to all.
And when Windows by microsoft is the most popular OS, I bet we will have to keep adapting to listen to decent sound, as they keep screwing around with new versions to try and get it right.

Use Linux :eek:hyeah:

(for better or for worse, audio included, I have chucked MS)

No wonder there is a Vinyl revival, a century old technology btw!
1931. It has a while to go before its first century! Of course, shellac goes back a generation. It was my parent's 78s that I grew up with.

Stereo, that amazing thing that is at the core of what we all love to do when not arguing about it ;), goes back, i think, to the 1930s, but was not a commercial product until the 1950s.

DACs are a thing made for a market. As you know as well as I do, every sound card has a dac, every PC player has a dac. People who do not know so well come to this forum and ask if they need a dac, not thinking of the ones they have already.

DACs have found a market among those who are not interested in recording music music, only playing it, and who do not need an ADC. Then they have been given the hifi marketing treatment, and sold in huge numbers to those whom the salesmen have convinced to feel that maybe their CD player is not good enough. They've even been sold to people who believe that the dac on their sound card is not good enough. On top of all that, they do represent an ideal product for some, and don't throw stuff at me on this one, because I am eagerly awaiting delivery of a new DAC!

It is quite likely that Bhagwan's RME card has an analogue output quality that would blow most of us away --- but just look at what he is using as a DAC! Serious stuff, as acknowledged not just by audiophiles but by sound professionals.

Thad, I agree with you on Networking having known TCP/IP protocols well. But again in the past I have eaten crow with my views
Me too. Would you believe that I believe in homeopathy? The bete noir of the rational world, water with nothing in it that cures things!

and in case of Music..it is not that science cannot measure it..We just Dont know What to measure ! and if we do find it we will definitely be able to measure it and I do blame audio manufacturers for the same.
I don't know what to measure --- but I am sure that engineers, both audio and electronic do. They spend their careers doing that. Only the listeners require magic as an explanation!

I have heard Bhagwans system and it is truly state of the art
I bet! I'd love to be there one day.

Knowing Bhagwans vast knowledge /experience i am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and hear from him as to what he feels...although i do not agree that it will make a difference and from reading his post even he is not sure..but wants to give it a try anyway
Well yes... but the utterly-impossible-but-let's-see route only encourages the purveyors. Another one sold, another dozen getting interested on the net, is all they care about, and if it isn't, and they are actually sincere, that's kind-of worse! At least green marker pen costs nothing --- which is why I tried it.

I do not believe in fancy power chords, given that the power unit they supply is half decent --- but I do not say "this is impossible."

I'm loathe to believe that certain digital connectors sound different --- but I do not say "this is impossible."

Different network transport/media? That is impossible. Which is why everyone is reading the same words on this webpage.
 
Last edited:
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

No, sid, my first first decent sound card has tolslink digital in and out, and when I bought it, it was a good deal because the model was already obsolescent. I think that was about 2002 or 2003. I had minidsik stuff, and a CD player with S/PDIF output too, toslink and coax . According to something I read a couple of days ago, the S/PDIF was specified in the CD Red Book --- so, if that is the case, it is as old as CDs themselves.

I hear you Thad, but my simple logic is this. The US is the largest market for audio components. In this market I know for a fact that computer audio is nascent, loosely measured by use of computers as sources at CES and other large audio shows (which determines what the majority of audio enthusiasts will buy in the future), which started about 3-4 years ago with the macbook and various other mac products as sources. So it is not because you are using computer audio from 10 years or I am using it from 2 years, it depends on the vast majority of the buyers in the largest markets who use it. Till then it is defined as early adopter market. Just like HDTV which was available in US market somewhere during early 2000's but did not become mainstream till mid 2000 and now you can buy a 50 inch LCD HDTV for $300-$400 and the market is already moving to 4k. BTW I am not choosing to build my Music PC, I would rather go to a store or online and buy one off the shelf if it is available. As you know that is not the case, unless one buys a generic PC, which I already did with my sony VAIO notebook used only for music and am not 100% happy. That is not the case with CD players, if you buy one you dont like, your option is not to go and build one, is it now? So why is that the case with computer audio if it is mature, standardized and available in the market since 2000 as you are propounding? If you know of a store online or otherwise that sells standard music PC's (not multipurpose PC's), please let me know and I will go and buy one. (I know of a few people, stores, who on audiogon are hawking mac minis with modification options for music and they cost double to 1.5 times the cost of the basic mac mini - I would hardly call this mass market either - as can be judged by the pricing)
Cheers,
Sid
 
Last edited:
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

You must be right Sidvee...but I am sure the technology should have trickled down to mid level products as well which I am not sure is happening....

Also your computer setup + DAC must be costing a bomb if it is bettering the Ayon CD2 and if that is true it bloody well sound nice....

And that is the reason Panditji, why I am saying that computer audio is still nascent. If it is mature, prices (not only of music pc's, sound cards but aslo necessary accessories like DACs etc) will come down and become standardized where you need not be a hardware guru to figure it out, and technology will trickle down, and even entry level products will start sounding good (just like the HDTV example I used in the previous post). In my setup, the computer plus usb to spdif converter used as a source costs about half of what the Ayon Cd2s as a cd player costs, so pricing equations have begun changing as well.
So yes the momentum is picking is up for computer audio to become widespread as a source, but from what I have seen and experienced it is definitely not the case now where comp. audio is widely used.
Cheers,
Sid
 
Last edited:
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Thanks for that link Bhagwan and a quote from that article by Josef Piri and Marcin Ostapowicz of Jplay:

"While were certain technical measurements will come in time, computer audio is still a new field"

So I lay to rest my contention that computer audio is still nascent. While one does not need to take the world of these two Gentlemen about that, I would tend to respect their views (on computer audio being a new field) as purveyors of software/equipment related to Computer Audio over general discussions in forums.
And as far as Jplay being a hoax, well now my curiosity is piqued. I will download a trial version and see how it actually sounds.
Cheers,
Sid
 
Last edited:
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

JPLAY Responds: An Open Letter | AudioStream

I think this is 'off tangent' relevant - so may be could make for some interesting reading = do glance through it.

Good Morning to all;

This is exactly what I was referring to earlier. Jplay is nothing but an elaborate audiophile scam. I had tried jplay earlier and my experiences are there in my post somewhere in this forum. If one sets up foobar or jriver correctly, there's nothing more that jplay can do to improve your audio quality - at least in theory and this is also my experience in my humble setup. YMMV.
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Is the 2 computer setup not the same that is being used by a lot of people? A storage like NAS and a media player (linn DS or MF M1 Clic to name a few )

The media players don't use windows and run an embedded or real- time OS.

The concept of jplay and two computers is still not clear to me. I did read the manual provided on jplay.
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Is the 2 computer setup not the same that is being used by a lot of people? A storage like NAS and a media player (linn DS or MF M1 Clic to name a few )

The media players don't use windows and run an embedded or real- time OS.

The concept of jplay and two computers is still not clear to me. I did read the manual provided on jplay.

What I understood from the manual is that they are advising us to run 2 instances of JPlay in 2 different systems and one with the sound reproduction (sound card/DAC) will be hibernated using the other system using the JPlay. The other system will hold all the storage. What you are referring is the normal setup that is NAS -> Music-PC (sound card/DAC). The software to play the music will be available only in one system and the other system will help for the storage alone. Thats the major difference in your referring setup and the JPlay setup.

Thanks
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

@Thad,

Now, of course, they will be building hifi boxes at hif prices, which are nothing but PCs inside. I think that at least one company is doing that, and a [previously] respected hifi name too

All source equipment are technology packs in a cases. Most will resemble mainstream pcs too in some way. But are they the same ? Do they sound the same ? :eek:
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

This is exactly what I was referring to earlier. Jplay is nothing but an elaborate audiophile scam. I had tried jplay earlier and my experiences are there in my post somewhere in this forum. If one sets up foobar or jriver correctly, there's nothing more that jplay can do to improve your audio quality - at least in theory and this is also my experience in my humble setup. YMMV.

Hey ROC, a friend of mine has moved into this 2 computer setup. He runs green mountain audio speakers. He swears by it. I have not done any comparisons so cannot comment. I have to say while playing the same songs compared to his older foobar setup, this sounds better to me. I guess we need to do a comparison to see what is goin on :):)
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

This is exactly what I was referring to earlier. Jplay is nothing but an elaborate audiophile scam. I had tried jplay earlier and my experiences are there in my post somewhere in this forum. If one sets up foobar or jriver correctly, there's nothing more that jplay can do to improve your audio quality - at least in theory and this is also my experience in my humble setup. YMMV.

Sir,

Thanks for this;

You have said 100 % exact what I said & believed for the past 3 ++ years;

I have been trying J Play for the past 3 years & was never convinced.

Foobar with ASIO & JRiver with Wasapi Event Style @ 25ms was perfect for me - This worked & it was brilliant.

However, before my Munich Trip - I tried the 2 box set up with J Play 5.1 - however with Win 7 [since my machines were Win 7 - 64 bit] & there was 'improvement' [This I mean over the J River]
Therefore in Munich I met the J Play people & spoke with them for 1 1/2 hours & lots happened. Will not get into that.

Came back - rebuilt the machines as per 'specs' & sir, this change is 'mad' !!
I would not write about it - else;
You have known me / of me etc. for several years - have you ever seen me get 'so excited' ?
Besides why do I write this here ?
2 reasons :-

a]
Sidvee has upgraded his DAC - I too used the Ayon Skylla Dac & know what the sound of that product is & what its potential is;
Therefore I want him to do / try what I have done - the improvement is astoinding...
b]
Other FM's that are playing the Computer Audio Game - can try to take some lead from here - this change is 100 % worth trying..

p.s. I do not want this to become a Cat 5/6/7 Ethernet Cable discussion - that is 100 % not important - I have not even received the Revelation Audio Labs Cable as yet - I will start a different thread for that - once the cable arrives & I have installed it - not on this thread...


This thread is about J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON - Can the Mods change the name of this thread ? Please.. Shall be appreciated...
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Is the 2 computer setup not the same that is being used by a lot of people? A storage like NAS and a media player (linn DS or MF M1 Clic to name a few )

The media players don't use windows and run an embedded or real- time OS.

The concept of jplay and two computers is still not clear to me. I did read the manual provided on jplay.

Sir,

My Computer Skills are poor - so I could never set it up well - nor can I explain it well - but I shall try;

I have had 2 machines for a while now = 2 + years.
1 Machine [silver] used to be my main machine - player; Had all the O/S + Music + RME Card + Ripper etc
2 Machine [black] used to be my server machine - music was here - 10 ++ TB of it & this used to feed the silver machine - musical content - like a NAS Server.

Now, this new J Play 5.1 is not like this;

The Silver Machine now has no HDD's
Only 1 SSD for Win 8 & J Play 5.1 [installation]

The Black Machine is now the 'interface' machine.
I choose music here & play from here.

This BM [Black Machine] sends the signal to the SM [Silver Machine] & puts it to sleep - Hibernate - Then the SM plays the music that has come from the BM to the Sound Card via the Ram & that is how digital data reaches my DAC.

I do hope I could explain things in a 'simple' manner.

I do not touch / see the SM at all.
I only play music on the BM & the BM sends the music to the SM & it then plays.
All changes on the SM are made on the BM & the change is auto affected on the SM - this is the J Play software;

:rolleyes:
 
re: J Play 5.1 - 2 Box on Win 8 with ULTRA Mode & Hibernate ON

Hey ROC, a friend of mine has moved into this 2 computer setup. He runs green mountain audio speakers. He swears by it. I have not done any comparisons so cannot comment. I have to say while playing the same songs compared to his older foobar setup, this sounds better to me. I guess we need to do a comparison to see what is goin on :):)

Yes, this is KBN - The Audio One;

He has been a J Play guy from as far back as I can remember...
I was never convinced for the past 3 years & I had never shifted.
However, for this shift - KBN has been very helpful - Team Viewer etc.

He does use the Acoustic Revive Lan Issolator & says it works - how / why etc. I do not know. He is an engineer by qualification & maybe he could be asked for technical explanation etc. I do not want to get involved in that...

All said, KBN too is 're-building' his machines - after he interacted with me & the euphoria I have displayed;
This will happen in 1 month - I assume.

FM's Try this & follow the instructions to the 'T' & the results will be 'super' !!
You will not be disappointed;;:yahoo:
 
Sir,

My Computer Skills are poor - so I could never set it up well - nor can I explain it well - but I shall try;

I have had 2 machines for a while now = 2 + years.
1 Machine [silver] used to be my main machine - player; Had all the O/S + Music + RME Card + Ripper etc
2 Machine [black] used to be my server machine - music was here - 10 ++ TB of it & this used to feed the silver machine - musical content - like a NAS Server.

Now, this new J Play 5.1 is not like this;

The Silver Machine now has no HDD's
Only 1 SSD for Win 8 & J Play 5.1 [installation]

The Black Machine is now the 'interface' machine.
I choose music here & play from here.

This BM [Black Machine] sends the signal to the SM [Silver Machine] & puts it to sleep - Hibernate - Then the SM plays the music that has come from the BM to the Sound Card via the Ram & that is how digital data reaches my DAC.

I do hope I could explain things in a 'simple' manner.

I do not touch / see the SM at all.
I only play music on the BM & the BM sends the music to the SM & it then plays.
All changes on the SM are made on the BM & the change is auto affected on the SM - this is the J Play software;

:rolleyes:


Thanks for the explanation.

I use a Media Player that sends the data to DAC. The files are stored on a NAS and to play the file, I choose the file on my iPad using Kinsky which in turns tells the media player to fetch the file from NAS.

In your version of setup, I see the Silver Machine as the Media Player, Black Machine as NAS + iPad controller.

I can understand your excitement due to improvement in the sound quality. Please don't be offended by my questions. I am just trying to understand the set-up as a layman/novice.
 
sid, you confuse maturity with market penetration. That there is not an audio pc in every home does not in any way indicate that PC audio is nascent, or not mature, or new. Items sold is not the measure --- although, consider the sound-card manufacturers who have been turning over enough stock to survive and profit.

square_wave, if I have been convinced, by reputation, inclination ...or even auditioning ;), that some expensive-to-me amplifier, for instance, is worth the cost, I'll buy it, and I will take great pleasure in the music, and have great pride of ownership, even including the logo on the front (a green-glowing Naim would do me nicely, for instance: perhaps one day!). I doubt that you and I feel much different on that. How would we feel if we open our box, and find standard PC components in there? That is what I am talking about when I mention PCs being sold at hifi prices, and I confidently predict that we will see it. This is not about boxes of technology: it is about boxes of PC components.

sid, there is no real difference between an "audio" PC and a general purpose machine. The things that make it a good audio machine (as long as it doesn't suffer any basic problems) are peripheral stuff like quiet fans and power supplies. Probably the best audio machine would be actually very low-spec, thus using little current, producing little heat, and ultimately requiring little or no cooling. The single best audio tweak in my PC is a large, expensive, and silent CPU cooler --- but if I didn't have a 3.2Ghz cpu I might not need it.


Glancing at that jplay thing, one thing they say is true: PCs are not real-time machines, and this can cause problems when it comes to AV. Many a time I have said this: if your PC has these problems, then you are either using it wrong, or, simply it is unsuitable for audio playback. This is not so much a matter of audiophile tweaks, it is a matter of whether or not the thing works. I speak from bitter experience: some just don't.

I don't use Windows any longer. It really would be a rather boring waste of my time to try to get better informed about the Jplay controversy when I'd so much rather be reading about Linux audio. I don't know the Jriver product at all, but I had Foobar installed on my work machine, and I left that office in 2002. If I'm going to do a taking of someone's word for it, then I'll happily go with the developers who have been bringing us the not-at-all new Foobar2000 since, err, 2000[?] Thirteen years of sound (no pun intended) audio development, and the product was good back then.

Thirteen years of development there --- and Jplay say this is new? What nonsense!

But I don't understand the aim and purpose of this particular two-box setup. Any links for quick information on that?

Back to ethernet. I read this...
Try an AudioQuest Forest Cat7 Ethernet cable and hear the difference from a standard patch cord. It takes a long time to run in.

seriously? Oh my god surely not!

Please, tell me it isn't true, and that nobody ever said that! Just imagine if this happened to a systems manager:

People, I re-cabled the patch panel with some really amazing cables over the weekend. For a while, there will be some wrong numbers in your spreadsheets, and even your photos might not look quite right, but please give it time, the cables need to burn in.

I can't get much beyond the word nonsense, without using language that would get me banned from this forum.

I am not a deeeep computer or network guy. I don't have a degree in computer science (or, err, anything, actually!) and I don't speak cisco (I speak shell, awk, sed, grep: that sort of thing. Or did.) but I really request those who have no idea what happens in a PC, or in a network, not to project their assumptions and guesses onto it. Even if some of those assumptions and guesses actually do work in the analogue electronics world.

I know absolutely nothing about what goes on behind the control panel of an analogue electronics box, so I leave it alone.
 
Last edited:
sid, you confuse maturity with market penetration. That there is not an audio pc in every home does not in any way indicate that PC audio is nascent, or not mature, or new. Items sold is not the measure --- although, consider the sound-card manufacturers who have been turning over enough stock to survive and profit.


Thirteen years of development there --- and Jplay say this is new? What nonsense!

Thad,
I am not confusing anything, all I am saying is that pc based hi fidelity sound is nascent. Even JPlay principals say that, and if I do a google search I can quote half a dozen other manufacturers who say that. So whose word is it going to be - people who actually deal in this for a living or a casual forum conversation from some part time participants (based in country where hi-fi is considered, well too hi-fi ) who are hell bent on proving a point so that even adverse comments from industry professionals do not matter . Not sure what you are trying to prove. OK if you say hi fi sound from computers is not new, fine it is not. Please excuse me, you are right and I am wrong. I have been spending decent amounts of money from the past 3 years trying to get into computer audio and getting what i consider good or high fidelity sound from my computer, having sold my $6500 cd player, attending shows, talking to industry friends - I used to be a audio reviewer for an online magazine, borrowing high end computer based components, and finally spending in excess of US$10k to arrive at my current computer based source and DAC, so you would think I know a little bit, but I guess that is not true. Computer based hi-fi has been around for years and we are all fools who are spending our hard earned money (or since we are in India easy earned money) futiley.
And btw I believe that experience is second to none. No amount of theory, posturing, postulating etc. is going to matter (reminds me of a scene in American pie where the kid wants to experience S#x and he is told that it feels like penetrating an apple pie and he really does it - so does it? Do you think the guy who really did it with another human being, or the kid who did with an apple pie had the real experience!!!!), so if you have not heard JPlay and are basing opinions based on forums and other e-nonsense, it is like doing it with baked goods. Same thing with not having experienced an external usb to spdif converter compared to internal sound card. All of you armchair experts - Go out there and do the real thing. Believe me there is nothing like it. Best of all, atleast one can experience JPlay for free, not even the cost of an apple pie or plum cake or reading pontificating posts. I know what I am going to do next week, download jplay and use it as an add on for my jriver to see if it makes a difference to this old technology called hi-fi from computer!
Cheers,
Sid
 
Last edited:
And with that last thread I will retire from this discussion to go and enjoy my computer based audio system. I am sure that there are various ways to enjoy music and to me computer based audio is one amongst the best, so it does not matter what others have to say, I will experiment, I will spend money, perhaps in vain as the so called IT experts postulated here - on technology that is already old, I will give my opinions freely to others who ask, but I will not have a closed mind and most important of all I will not dismiss something or claim I know everything about it, without actually having experienced it - which unfortunately seems to be the way to discuss and debate on this great forum of ours.
Cheers,
Sid
 
Last edited:
sid, I don't want to make this personal, but it seems you cannot be detached from your word "nascent," regardless of what others have been doing for decade or more, and regardless of having had the age of the technology pointed out to you. You talk about experience: yes, ten years of pc listening, twenty of computer technology --- but, according to you I wasn't doing any of this, so I can only be grateful to the companies that paid me!

Perhaps I should have had a closed mind, and not noticed the products from RME (founded 1996), M-Audio (products made in 2000-2004 are still recognised names), Echo (Wow: "Echo began designing and manufacturing computer audio products in 1978" Maybe I shouldn't be so keen to upgrade from mine!), Lynx (The LynxONE dates back to 1999, and, yes, is still in production. Maybe I might even get what was once my dream soundcard!) were around and being sold over a decade ago? Certainly it seems I should not have gained experience by buying any of them! A friend and I had RME and M-Audio between us, and I remember the guy in the shop telling me that he was awaiting delivery of a vastly expensive Motu unit for himself. Of course, we used to go to music shops to buy this stuff, but we we, and many others were plugging into ...hifi. Perhaps it took a bit of an open mind to do that at the time. To be honest, we didn't think that way: we were techies by trade and nature, and enjoyed our music

That is history, and I don't think nascent is the appropriate word.

No, I have not heard jplay, and, as I said, I will no more be a microsoft customer, so I will not. I asked for a pointer to an explanation of the two machine setup. I'll gladly read it if I get one.

As for those professionals: do you not count the Foobar guys? Are they not professionals too? I'm not saying that they or jplay are necessarily right, but I recognise a bluster argument when I see one. "Professionals" in various fields are in the habit of disagreeing: if we do not have their level of expertise, then we can join which ever camp we like, but cannot dismiss one side as "professional" and the other side as not.

I don't know about this jplay thing. It is a diversion.... I know that suggestions made about networking materials in an audio-machine context are absurd, and I know that what Audioquest says on it "diamond" page is an utter nonsense. It makes a complete mockery of the technology. Having an open mind need not mean being open to being sold a joke at a high price.

And I don't really care for being told what I wasn't doing ten years ago, as I was there at the time and saw myself doing it. But hey, whatever... :) Something useful always comes of these conversations, even if they have occasional heated moments.
 
Last edited:
Buy from India's official online dealer!
Back
Top