@Subjectivists, An objectivist ( in the audio hobby) believes that the epitome of loudspeaker design is one that adheres to certain measurements and belief systems within the AES itself. It is as good an approach just like all the other types of belief systems within the industry. I think we should just kill and bury this horse and be done with it.
@Objectivists, I had couple of questions which has always bothered me with your approach.
Q1 - Let's say, you buy a speaker that adheres to your criteria and set that up well in your house. Let that speaker be " the one" that meets all those criteria really well. You are convinced that beyond this point, it is all colour and subjectivity.
A friend / audio professional brings another speaker that belongs to the subjective camp to your home and sets that up well. When you listen to it, it blows your mind with its performance and you realise that you stopped listening to the other speaker albeit once in a while out of curiosity. Will you sell the other speaker and get this one for yourself ?
Q2 - What are those criteria that brings more performance to the table when you go up the ladder among speaker models within companies that believes in objective measurements. Speaker brands like ATC, Quested etc. Some of their speakers cost a lot of money. Their entry models for studio already measure well. All that is needed to increase box size, power handling capacity, frequency extension which should not affect pricing so much. Ahuja kind of approach also should be able to get you all that. It is actually very easy to get the same measurements using much cheaper drives and choice of materials, components, construction techniques etc.