Passive_audio_enthusiast
Well-Known Member
An objectivist is a person who knows what matters for a transparent reproduction of the audio. So he knows what matters when it comes to buying an audio equipment and buys only what is needed. He uses this equipment to listen to all the music in the world.Engineering exam question:
Q1. Distinguish between objectivist and subjectivist? 10 marks
A1: An objectivist is a person who listen more to his hardware and less to the music.
An subjectivist is a person who listen more to music and less to the hardware.
Exam results - not yet declared. -
A subjectivist person listens the same track on every possible combination of equipment he can get hands on and enjoy the differences between the systems,and continue searching everyday for that sound he might one day like. At the same time he doesn’t undertand what exactly is wrong with the current system and has no clue about which direction he should go to get it fixed. So he keeps performing iterations of combinations between devices on end wasting time and money.
Unless he is lucky he is never gonna strike gold until his hearing wears out with his age .
It’s not completely true, but I think a little Defence
Tannoys, KLH, graham audio - all of them have different frequency response.Totally get where you are coming from. I was exactly here about 2 decades back. From an academic point of view this is a very valid point of view. However from a practical point of view, there are far too many variables which makes the home listener's job way more adventurous. This is very much like the digital vs analogue discussion.
-Studio acoustics vs homes
-Home listener's preferences vs what the artist / studio engineer thought sounded right with the distribution master
-Tonal quality of loudspeakers which cannot be measured
-Driver cone materials
-Enclosure design and materials
-Cone vs ribbons vs panels
-What loudspeaker, amp combination entertains you the most in your specific home environment. Some of the home systems can make your jaw drop !
-What kind of system work with majority of your music collection? This is very important. Even if you try various studio gear combinations, they all sound different. Many seasoned studio engineers have preferences for studio gear especially loudspeakers even though they all measure almost the same.
Your advice will not work for majority of home listeners. So, this discussion is just an academic one. But respect your point of view.
PS - My post is purely from the point of view / belief that a music system's only function is entertainment. It needs to appeal to the senses and provide entertainment for the senses with majority of a person's music. Most high quality home gear use good measurement as a baseline during the initial phases of design and development and then use subjective means to go higher and maybe even purposefully deviate a bit to achieve subjective levels of performance to achieve this end. This is a well known and accepted practice. So this is not even a discussion between Objectivists and Subjectivists. This thread should be renamed " Can mainstream measurement criteria fully and accurately measure all parameters that contribute to a high performance and fully entertaining audio product across the entire spectrum of discerning listeners ? ". The so called subjectivists are pretty much looking at this discussion from this point of view. In case you were wondering what the heck is going on ....Last Saturday, I listened to Tannoys, KLH Model 5, Graham audio in the same room with a lot of my music. Graham audio and Tannoy has studio lineage but they both sound very different. I can clearly see why one type of listener will like one over the other. What measurement can predict that ? That is the kind of thinking we have. Bunch of nuts that way. But that is the fun with this
Also their directivity is different. Hence they sound different. If you look at the graphs it’s easy to understand why they sound the way they are.