First of all, apologies for the week overdue post. I was immediately caught up with a project deliverable so did not have any time till today. Happens with most of my other responses too...I start some conversation in a thread and have to leave midway because work comes up.
Having said that, here are my observations about the excellent meet:
1. A big thank you to Capt. Rajesh, Rajiv, Srini, and Murali N., again. I know you've received a lot of thank you's but I think the meticulous organisation of the meet and your hard work fully deserves each one of them.
2. Similar thanks to all the sponsors who gave us all a chance to listen to some outstanding equipment, and who were always ready to help out with track selection, questions, and general information. I know it must have been hard work to transport, set up, and repack all those heavy items, so thank you for keeping up your enthusiasm throughout the meet.
3. I made a new friend in GrubyHalo who was kind enough to pick me up, treat me to a hot Tamil breakfast at a great restaurant that I did not know existed, was excellent and informative company during the meet, and who has rekindled my interest in DIY ... and South Indian coffee techniques
4. I have been invited by Rajiv and Santosh to listen to their audio at home, an offer that i will definitely take up when free. And the offer was made by both in a genuinely welcoming way, which shows the love they have for music and exposing more people to good sound.
5. Room 1 was the MBL solid-state room and was basically a comparison between the Thiels and the Avalons. I preferred the Thiels for almost every song played because the voices sounded more holographic through them. However, there was one drums track that made us understand why the Avalons were priced so high. These speakers made the song visceral...every beat was reproduced with raw emotion and stunning power. The Thiels sounded soft and weak in comparison.
Lesson learned: what I had mentioned in my Guidelines post on this forum...Know yourself. Each speaker will reproduce some genres of music better than others, even the top-tier ones. Understanding what you listen to most often will help you choose a better speaker for your listening habits. It may not end up being the costlier one.
6. The Musical Fidelity and the Monitor Audio's sounded good for the music played. But I immediately missed the detail and slam that the MBL setup had. My wallet, however, did not miss the several lakhs in rupee weight that it would have lost had I wanted to buy the MBL setup.
7. The Kef room sounded boomy because of the lack of space. However, the flagship Kef really stood out as the best among all, even floorstanders. It held its own with bass and details. Must listen.
8. Room 3 was the most musically appealing, from my viewpoint. The tube amps with the Arista speakers was a magical combination and I spent the most time listening to it. I tried different songs and combinations and everything sounded melodious, soothing, and beautiful. Capt. Rajesh should NOT sell these speakers...he should buy the Dared amp and convince his wife in military style (Sorry Thad...its too much pain to see these speakers go :0 )
9. The modified Kef horn-loaded speakers blew me away. End of story. The voices had a holographic presence, even more than the Arista. The tube synergy was excellent, the music had everything and more. Gruby and I made an interesting comparison between the two speakers on the "Another brick in the wall" track. Through the Arista, the track sounded ... nice. But there was definitely slam missing, some element of detail that was less. Switch to the Kefs and ... Wow! That was the only emotion we both felt. Pink Floyd came out, shook our hands, said "Thank you for freeing us"... and continued singing. The modified Kefs were the rockstars in this meet. Thank you Chacko for being patient enough to explain the design modifications and history of these speakers. Again same point : The Arista's were excellent speakers and would make many happy. However, if rock is your main music, go for the Kefs.
10. The Genelecs stunned me as much as they did Thad. He has written extensively on the sound, so I won't repeat except saying Ditto to everything.
11. Thad was the most elegantly formally attired South Indian in the meet.
12.The Spendor-Quad combination sounded ... just right. That is the best way to describe them. They did everything right...every note was natural and effortless. They did not go as low as others, the Kef flagship bookshelf model beat them in details and power...and still they sounded less fatiguing, more melodious than any other speaker in the Kef room. GrubyHalo sms'ed me in the middle of his meditative listening trance and asked me to drop everything and hear these. After I heard them, I understood his urgency! I also understood what Rajiv meant when he wants to listen to the music, not the frequency response. But the engineer in me is very curious about the FR...I have a feeling it will be almost flat except for a mid-bass hump to give it that British warmth. If anyone has a FR plot of the Spendors, please point me to it.
13. I also noticed that tube amps do not add anything "warm" to the sound. A good tube amp and a good solid-state will produce music in the same beautiful way...at least in the comparisons I did with the two units. I did not hear the so-called tube sound anywhere. All I heard was what I would expect with any well-engineered solid-state as well.
14. All in all, I met some very nice and interesting people, and listened to some very nice and interesting equipment. What more can one ask for?
Regards,
Ajinkya