The Amazing SpiderMan?

venkatcr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
7,203
Points
113
Location
Chennai
I just came across the making of a new SpiderMan - The Amazing Spider Man (The Amazing Spider-Man - Official Sony Pictures International Movie Site). It seems to have a major role for Irfaan Khan. But, what is the issue about remaking of Spider Man? And what happened to Tobey Maguire. They seem to have a new guy playing the role. Anyone has any ideas?

Cheers
 
Last edited:
After TDK, the studios felt that the Spiderman series didnt do as well as it could have, so were planning a rest of the series or atleast thats what I had read in an article.
 
Yup saw too...very underwhelming promo... :(

N Spiderman 1 is hardly 10 yrs old...why r they screwing up the franchise? just to go 3D :(

Money talks! A 3D release will guarantee theater attendance. More money for the production houses. Worse still, even a lame Spiderman movie will do well because it is such a popular character.
 
This is really weird. So when the new actor refuse to do Spider Man 7, what will they do? Start all over again?

I liked what one of the comments in Bluu's link said, 'no toby no watchy!'. Absolutely correcty.

Cheers
 
Money talks! A 3D release will guarantee theater attendance. More money for the production houses. Worse still, even a lame Spiderman movie will do well because it is such a popular character.

Sad man...really Sad :( n they don't realize they are screwing up a good franchise!

Did anyone notice therz no Irrfan Khan in the promo at all...but yeah one can hear his one sentence in the promo in background
 
Well I disagree... Sam Raimi hasn't done justice to great character like Spiderman... I watched the three movies back-to-back last month and only the second one holds up to multiple viewing mostly for Doc Ock... and God was the third one baaaaddd... All three were so cheesy...

Mark Webb (Webb and Spiderman - coincidence or kismet!) has done 500 days of Summer which is a movie I heartily recommend... and a bunch of music videos and shorts before that.... Andrew Garfield is a decent enough actor (Boy A and Never let me go). So I'm cautiously optimistic...

Spiderman has always been a character grounded in real life in spite of having spectacular powers... having to drop out of college... working as freelance photographer specializing in his namesake to make ends meet... having his loved ones targeted by his enemies as way to get to him... Problems with his marriage...

More than the director, I'm worried about the script... It'll take a great script to show some of these aspects and still give the audience the all out action sequences...

For the record, the Dark Knight though featuring good performances from Heath Ledger, Oldman, and Eckhart was unnecessarily long and overwrought. They could have made a simpler more effective movie that was more true to the character and the comics.

Cheers
 
From IMDB Trivia page -

Sam Raimi was originally going to direct "Spider-Man 4", with cast members Tobey Maguire (Peter Parker/Spider-Man), Kirsten Dunst (Mary Jane Watson), Rosemary Harris (May Parker), J.K. Simmons (J. Jonah Jameson), Bill Nunn (Joe "Robbie" Robertson), Bryce Dallas Howard (Gwen Stacy), James Cromwell (Captain George Stacy), and Dylan Baker (Dr. Curt Connors) all signed on to reprise their roles. Tobey Maguire would've received the most money out of the returning cast members, making $50 million to do not only a fourth "Spider-Man", but also a fifth. However, when Raimi and Sony had creative problems with how they wanted the story to be told, Raimi quit the project and Maguire left with him. Shortly after, Sony announced that the next "Spider-Man" movie would be a reboot for the franchise.

Before this was confirmed as a reboot of the "Spider-Man" franchise, Sam Raimi was going to direct a fourth installment to his "Spider-Man" movies. John Malkovich was hired to portray the new main villain Adrian Toomes/the Vulture, while Anne Hathaway was reportedly hired to be Felicia Hardy. It was reported that Felicia Hardy would have deviated from her comic counterpart, as she would have been the Vulture's daughter and she would become the Vulturess rather than the Black Cat. However, Raimi had problems with the script, which is rumored to have included Peter and Mary Jane married and welcoming a baby girl, Spider-Man intentionally murdering the Vulture in the final battle, and the final minutes had Peter throwing his Spider-Man identity in the garbage that would lead into the events of the planned fifth film where Peter again dons the Spider-Man identity. Although Raimi hired Alvin Sargent to re-write the script, he still didn't like the story that was planned and he decided not to make "Spider-Man 4".

Before this Spider-Man film was made, Sam Raimi was going to direct "Spider-Man 4". Raimi originally wanted to include only one villain, and he wanted Dylan Baker to reprise his role as Dr. Curt Connors so that he could finally become the main villain, the Lizard. Baker was going to return for "Spider-Man 4", but Raimi apparently was told by Sony not to include the Lizard as the villain because the studio thought it would have been better to have a human villain with a visible face, like Doctor Octopus in "Spider-Man 2". With those orders, Raimi decided to have the Vulture as the main villain and he cast John Malkovich in the part. He also wanted Anne Hathaway to be his daughter, the Vulturess, as a rumored love interest/enemy for Spider-Man. Reports say that Sony did not want the Vulture as the main villain, because they felt it wasn't a challenging or popular enough villain for Spider-Man to fight with and the studio thought they'd have too many unsold Vulture toys on shelves when the film was released. Creative disagreements with the script and the choice of villain(s) ultimately led Sam Raimi to leave the project. Ironically, on-line rumors indicate that the next main villain for the "Spider-Man" reboot might be the Lizard.
 
I honestly felt that the Spider-Man franchise had run its course and was getting a little too mushy at the end of SM3. Probably the reason they shelved t SM4 and went in for a reboot with a new director in tow.
The intention it seems is to make it a lot more darker and macabre (sort of like what Christopher Nolan did with Batman Begins and The Dark Knight). Also, it would feature Peter Parker in college and battling The Lizard & Van Adder (another incarnation of the Green Goblin).
It would have been great if they could somehow have included this in the Marvel Universe scheme of things; would have added a lot of scope for potential crossovers in the future.
 
SM series started falling down the depths from part 2 onwards, while 3 was horrible. A bit like the other SM, Superman. I had far too much expectations from it in its re-make. In fact, the tele-series Smallville was far better.
 
Get the Award Winning Diamond 12.3 Floorstanding Speakers on Special Offer
Back
Top