Psychological disorders are to be mentioned/discussed in a non-labelling, non-judgmental, empathetic, and scientific manner. Pop psychology articles usually do more harm by spreading tropes (like ‘OCD’ has become one) resulting in those actually suffering from the disorders reluctant to talk about their problems or seek help fearing ridicule/pity.The Obsessive, Compulsive Audiophile
During the past two decades in practice as a psychotherapist and Doctor of Clinical Hypnotherapy, I have witnessed most every psychological disorder listed in the Diagnostic Service Manual. This manual defines each psychological disorder which Psychiatrists, Doctors of Psychology and Doctors of...www.dagogo.com
It is a provocative article published in an online publication for audiophiles. (Not in a academic publication)
When the author starts the article by stating his qualifications and experience as a psychotherapist and quotes the diagnostic manual on psychological disorders upfront, the article is quite likely to be taken by most readers as scientifically backed. If the intention was to be satirical and write a humorous article, one could have avoided establishing one’s professional credibility at the start. Also, one doesn’t see a disclaimer anywhere.
That’s where the fun starts. It’s difficult to say if he is serious using a dubious science degree to call out the …
It’s real, though unaccredited
It sounds like this article is disturbing. I can request the mods to remove itIt’s real, though unaccredited
Doctor of Clinical Hypnotherapy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Anyway, I’ve made my point and cautioned the potential readers on this forum. If medical professionals want to make or propagate humour at the cost of inappropriate use of medical terms and being insensitive to those afflicted with the conditions, it’s their choice.
If I don't like what I see when I look in the mirror, I don't blame the mirror and remove the mirror.
Not my intention to disturb anyone’s peace of mind through online posts.If I don't like what I see when I look in the mirror, I don't blame the mirror and remove the mirror.
psychcentral.com
I agree with the most part of what you say but the source should be addressed - you're just linking to it. In that article, comments are still open so anyone taking issue with that article should address the author directly with their PoV. AFAIK, that article is written tongue in cheek and as usual, as is our wont, we're 0verthinking it and 0verreacting. I quite enjoyed reading it.Not my intention to disturb anyone’s peace of mind through online posts.
But you are right I recognised a few behaviours mentioned in the article in similar my own to a small extent. Thankfully it’s nowhere near out of my control. We should keep in mind the likelihood that there may be a few who may be struggling and need help.
The point when our interest in something (obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviour, to observers) becomes disruptive and starts affecting day to day lives, is poorly defined and subjective. Treatment is available and Mental health experts can help. Cognitive behavioural therapy seems to be more effective than other methods.
In clinical settings showing recordings of obsessive behaviour to those being treated for severe OC behaviour is of no therapeutic value.Can Hypnotherapy Help OCD Symptoms?
Here's all about hypnotherapy for OCD and how working on your obsessions under hypnosis might help relieve distress.
If this thread causes distress to anyone it should be removed. Please DM a mod or me.
I am sure we can find a way to discuss our obsessions without this article.
oconnorpg.com
That should be your call. I DM mods when I find a thread in violation of the forum rules. This one isn’t. Hence appealed to your good sense. And shall leave it at that.
I apologise if I trivialised any mental health issue or offended you in any way.
Just to be clear, there was nothing in your posts to take offence, ergo, I am not feeling offended. Yes, I do think the article trivialises mental health issue and therefore brought it to your notice.
Yes. And you can request a moderator to delete it based on your volition. If you are convinced.
As clarified earlier, I don’t see anything in violation of the forum rules in it. It’s entirely your choice as it should be with each of us. I exercised my choice when I posted what issues I saw with the article. And I respect your choice to post what you deem worth, as long as I can express my POV.
Pork?
Thanks.Just to be clear, there was nothing in your posts to take offence, ergo, I am not feeling offended. Yes, I do think the article trivialises mental health issue and therefore brought it to your notice.
Yes. And you can request a moderator to delete it based on your volition. If you are convinced.
As clarified earlier, I don’t see anything in violation of the forum rules in it. It’s entirely your choice as it should be with each of us. I exercised my choice when I posted what issues I saw with the article. And I respect your choice to post what you deem worth, as long as I can express my POV.
