7.1 is the Future

Same as Manoj. When going past 5.1 speakers, rears first, then heights.

One thing in favour of rears is software: there are over 350 titles on Blu-ray with 7.1 soundtracks mixed for that speaker configuration. There are even three Bollywood films due with 7.1 soundtracks.

So far, nothing mixed with height content.
 
My rear surrounds in 7.1 setup are around 3.5 feet behind the seating position, however I thik in even 7.1 tracks I hardly feel any seperate effect due to the two of them, it all seems seamless (I mean difficult to figure out which one gives what effect). Shall I keep their relative volume more than the side surrounds?
 
Try moving your side speakers bit front than your seating position. Mine are about 1 ft towards front than exactly on side.
Also, make sure that Dolby PLIIx filter is turned on for all 2 channel and 5 channel sources. Thats the one which will extract the rear channels.
 
As mentioned in the thread very few BDs are having 7.1, and compared to 5.1 additional two channels are Surround Back Left and Right.

Can anyone suggest good 7.1 BD movies using which we can experience effects in Surround back channels.

I have used DTS Neo:6, DD IIx etc which produces 7.1 out of 5.1, but I would like to hear discrete 7.1 channel movie.

Idea is to find whether surround back is better than Front High, when we are having 7.1 BDs with contents for these channels.
 
one argument I read was that human ears are designed and positioned in a way to hear more from the front and sides ...
 
I have used DTS Neo:6, DD IIx etc which produces 7.1 out of 5.1, but I would like to hear discrete 7.1 channel movie.
DTS Neo:6, as the name implies, outputs 6.1 channels (same mono surround-back signal sent to both rear speakers). PLIIx does indeed output 7.1 channels.

As for good 7.1 mixes, 'TRON:Legacy' on Blu-ray makes excellent use of rear vs side separation in the surround field (easier to hear during the quieter moments than during loud action scenes). Depending on set up, you should also be able to hear lots of phantom imaging between speakers, especially along the mid-wall (between front and side speakers).
Idea is to find whether surround back is better than Front High, when we are having 7.1 BDs with contents for these channels.
Unfortunately there are no soundtracks with discrete height channels, so you can't make that comparison. However, you can compare extracted surround-back channels to extracted height channels (Dolby PLIIz will do both).
 
one argument I read was that human ears are designed and positioned in a way to hear more from the front and sides ...
Absolutely. Despite being on the sides of the head, our ears point forward. As a result, human hearing is most acute up front (we can localize sound to within a couple of degrees) and not so good around us (localization errors up to 20 degrees).

Since we tell direction by comparing the sound coming into both ears, our ability to create phantom images is worst at our sides, where we're basically listening with only one ear (the other ear is in acoustical shadow and not helping much). This is why it is important to have a pair of surround speakers along our sides, to stabilize lateral imaging.

But placing the surrounds directly to the sides leaves a sonic hole behind you in the surround field, hence why some people felt the need for a second pair of surrounds behind you. And that was the argument that brought about 7.1-speaker layouts 25 years ago.
 
Using four surround speakers gave me enough of a diffuse and enveloping surround field that I didn't find it necessary to resort to speakers that are diffuse themselves (bipoles, dipoles, etc). Most of the information in the surround channels is ambient in nature, but for the occasional directional effect, monopoles gave me better localization. In the end it comes down to personal preference: if you like the diffuse effect of bipoles, then that's what you should get. What if you're watching movies that are musicals (like every Bollywood film)? Would you be better off with movie speakers or music speakers?
I personally also prefer monopoles over dipoles for the surround speakers. This is specially so in a 7.1 or 6.1 sytem. For me the bipoles don't provide enough directionality when needed. In fact I believe in this so strongly that I am sure that most people would prefer a monopole setup over a b ipole setup in a blind test.

Personally, I don't really make the distinction. If your system does well with music, then it will do well with movies. Sound is sound. The speakers don't know whether the source is a movie or music.
Very well said and you echo my thougths exactly. I have always advised all my friends and customers to pick speakers keeping in mind music, for good music speakers will by default be good for movies too.
 
you dont need a seperate 11.2 channel source for the 11.2 channel system , the height channels are encoded or matrixed within the regular 7.1 channels. The 4 height channels are rendered by using this matrixed information and reading the spacious cues in the audio source . When the speakers are correctly placed in th 11.2 system , it can blow away all 7.1 channel systems the experience is awsome
Signs, LOTR , Source Code , are just a few of the movies that give an extraordinary 11.2 experience and the movie called we were soldiers was the first movie which had dedicated height channels matrixed with the regular multi channel audio
Who ever has auditioned my 11.2 channel system uttered this.. OMG.... how come .....

And all this was due to the extra enveloping sound stage created by the height channels
 
Last edited:
you dont need a seperate 11.2 channel source for the 11.2 channel system , the height channels are encoded or matrixed within the regular 7.1 channels. The 4 height channels are rendered by using this matrixed information and reading the spacious cues in the audio source . When the speakers are correctly placed in th 11.2 system , it can blow away all 7.1 channel systems the experience is awsome
Signs, LOTR , Source Code , are just a few of the movies that give an extraordinary 11.2 experience and the movie called we were soldiers was the first movie which had dedicated height channels matrixed with the regular multi channel audio
Who ever has auditioned my 11.2 channel system uttered this OMG.... how come .....

Oh You have 11.2 Setup acoustics:licklips: How it sounds. Can u give some review regarding your system
 
the movie called we were soldiers was the first movie which had dedicated height channels matrixed with the regular multi channel audio
Correct, but the height channel information is not on the disc (DVD or BD). The mix with the height info was done after the home video mix had been locked and submitted.

So while height speakers may sound pleasing (and I wouldn't discourage anyone from using them), keep in mind that there isn't a single DVD or BD that contains actual height channel info. Enjoy the effect, just don't fool yourself into thinking that it is something that it isn't.
 
That's true for movie theatres, but not for home audio. 7.1-channel pre-amp/processors have been around since 1986. I've been running a 7.1 set-up since 1991. At this point there are over 350 titles on Blu-ray with 7.1 sound. 5.1 is going to remain the norm for a long time. There are relatively few movie released per year in 7.1 sound. For example, out of the hundreds of films due to be released in the US, only 9 are slated to have 7.1 soundtracks. (3 Indian films are supposed to have 7.1 sound: Dum Maro Dum, Ra.One, Don 2)

Can you list the names of best blu-ray with 7.1
 
Mr. sdurani i think you should read this :

Height channels - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why? That article makes no mention of any sources with matrixed height information (not even 'We Were Soldiers') and contains factual errors in each and every paragraph.
and can you answer one thing , when you sit and watch a BD or a DVD which has any of these sounds such as Rain , thunder , planes flying over head , Fireworks etc etc, havent u ever felt the sound placed above your head on your system ?
Sure. But any system with elevated surrounds will create imaging overhead, especially when combined with expectation bias (where your brain expects those sounds to come from). Nothing unusual about that; and no different than hearing sounds occasionally image outside your front L/R speakers.

BTW, if you're already hearing sounds above you, then that doesn't really bolster the case for height speakers, does it?
 
Can you list the names of best blu-ray with 7.1
Haven't kept a list, but if you have 'TRON: Legacy' on BD, try chapter 12. Turn the level up (a few dB below reference) and close your eyes. The begining of this chapter (until the music starts and they hop a ride on the freighter) is a good demo of what 7.1 can do. The fact that it is a quiet scene, rather than a noisy action scene, really lets you hear the separation between what's happening at your sides vs what's happening behind you. There is also some terrific phantom imaging between speakers, especially along the mid-wall between your fronts and sides.

Also, if you have the DVD of the old Disney film 'Mission to Mars', try chapter 11, where the mission commander's voice circles the room. It's a 5.1 source, not 7.1 channels. When played back with PLIIx, you'll hear the voice pan through each surround speaker, one by one in a smooth arc. Great demonstration of the advantages of a 7.1 speaker layout, even when the source isn't 7.1 channels.
 
hi to all,

Very good thread for having details about the present and future surround sounds, im really into this thread.

Hi acoustics,

Can you please elaborate what AVR you are using for 11.2 setup and how you setup your speakers in your room, please give us the details and also if possible please post your 11.2 photos here in this thread. so that so many noobs like me can get good surround sound system as your setup

thanks
 
@ Sdurani
I wanted to shed some light on the process of sound track mixing and reproducing it.

As u might be aware of the fact that there are 2 types of mixes for a movie soundtrack namely "discrete" and "matrix"

What you read on the BD discs is discrete 7.1 , which means With discrete surround sound, the transmission medium allows for the same number of channels of source and destination ie one-to-one, channel-to-speaker, but it does not mean that all these discrete channels are not related to each other in some way. 2 discrete audio channels are cable of holding 2 more matrix-ed channels on them and if these 2 discrete audio channels are fed into a matrix decoder the these can be split-ed up into 4 channels.
This is how the height channels are encoded in both front LR and the Surround LR channels

Now lets talk about why this is not listed on Bluray discs , I have around 30 to 40 Audio Cds from the late 90's which are in Punjabi, Hindi and English . These Disc's have a stereo logo printed on them , but when you play them thru a dolby prologic decoder you get a very nice surround audio with just the background effects , chorus etc and no vocals in the surround , the question now is that how is this possible ? There should be a dolby prologic logo on them ,, See this has something to do with how the sound material is recorded , processed and then encoded . A majority of people lets say more than 80 percent like to listen to music in just plain stereo LR , there are very expensive stereo pre amps and stereo amps available up to the audiophile grade just to maintain max channel separation and pure music.When a stereo CD is played through these expensive systems the surround elements are still there but they are placed in front of the listener and not behind. This is my point, there are sound elements in both music and movie sound tracks which are always there but when these are extracted and placed at respective positions the scenario changes , its a totally different thing .

The height channels rely upon these certain kind of sound elements which are either naturally distinct or have been produced by altering their phase and have been processed using complex mathematical algorithms which give these sound elements some thing called sound fields. These sound fields are also known as spacious cues. These sound elements or images when are played back through conventional 5.1 or 7.1 surround systems are reproduced in a horizontal plane by the front LR and the surround LR, Now lets not forget something out here that all 5.1 6.1 and 7.1 sound systems are 2d planar or just 360 degree sound systems , they just have 2 axis the x axis and the y axis , the depth is always lacking which is the z -axis and hence they don't sound like they should.

If a person goes out and stands in an open space, the sounds that reach his ears are not from a planar source(s) its actually a 3D sound sphere around that persons head which may include both direct sounds and reflected sounds.And then comes the human brain which does a lot of math to perceive these sounds in a certain fashion , when sound encoding is done all this is kept in mind the HRTF stuff and physics of sound and i just don't want to go that deep.

Now if certain sound elements are identified , decoded and mapped to front height channels and the rear height channels the sound stage no longer remains 2d it changes to cubic or a sphere inside this cube and trust me this changes a lot

you stated that ""BTW, if you're already hearing sounds above you, then that doesn't really bolster the case for height speakers, does it? "

yes it bolsters the case by a nice magnitude in my case (if 5.1 sounds better than tv speakers and if lord of the rings sound better with the discrete back surround and if 7.1 sounds better than the 6.1 then obviously 11.2 sounds better and hopefully the future 22.2 even more exciting).
it sounds
more spacious
more enveloping
more depth
Try to get a demo of the movie "Signs" or "LOTR" or "Gladiator" on a z11 or 3067
 
Last edited:
Wharfedale Linton Heritage Speakers in Red Mahogany finish at a Special Offer Price. BUY now before the price increase.
Back
Top