A sign of things to come

Gobble you are a man after my own heart! And despite the fact that I love the English language I cannot but be bemused by its failings.

I particularly believe that the gift of innate musicality was not given in any great margin to English as compared to several other languages. Among other gifts, that is.


To me, It reflects an akward (sometimes underdeveloped) mind process and not in tune with an eastern mindset that I feel is more sophisticated in understanding the deeper meanings of life and the universe better. Edit: hence the Indian who learns to master english exclusively over and above his mother tongue or local languages actually learns to cripple himself although he believes he is on his towards becoming a great "progressive" !!

Debates and thought processes are likely to fail to reach exalted levels they could if conducted in English. That is my personal opinion based on whatever little I have tried to understand from reading Sanskrit or other translations (in English!) :)

OT again...

-G
 
Last edited:
Gobble, I don't want to start an argument, but what you said is very interesting.

One of the problems with the Indian languages is most of them (excepting maybe Tamil and a few others) are dialects. At the same time, the development of these languages have been stilted for various reasons. In the ancient times, Sanskritisation hampered their growth, then came the domination of Persian languages through the Moghul period, followed, of course by English over the last 400 years of colonialism.

The end result, all these languages have stayed in the past. Words are being formed today for modern use, but each language is woefully behind times and all attempts are already too late.

Most Indian languages are excellent in their own way for arts, but are completely useless for science. As TOI said, 'In an under-developed language system, thought processes will also remain underdeveloped. In modern knowledge societies, underdeveloped languages cannot produce advanced thought. The present Indian languages, including Hindi, are more underdeveloped than any European language of the early 18th century'

As we attempt to move forward, like the Europeans, we will be held back by our linguistic chauvinism. As we attempt to prove to ourselves that Tamil is better than Hindi which is better than Telugu, as a nation, we will just get side stepped. Within the country, control of knowledge will be held by a Elitist few, and as this group gets smaller, our incompetencies will only grow.

I see indications of these already. You teach Engineering in Tamil and what happens - you get a road with a manhole jutting 6 inches above! How do you teach Oracle in Malayalam? How do you compute or write code properly when you cannot even understand the basic nuances of the language?

As a exporting nation, we are way way behind China in the manufacturing sector. Our feeble command over English has give us some advantages over other countries in the services sector - BPO, auditing, accounting, editing, etc. But this is a very slender advantage that we might lose very quickly if we continue our linguistic chauvinism. The Eastern mindset may be good for Yoga and Ayurveda. It may be good for teaching how to maintain a balanced lifestyle. It can never help us send a rocket to the moon, which is what we are attempting to do. It can never help us create an engine that can give us 50kmpl, which is what our dire necessity.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Gobble, I don't want to start an argument, but what you said is very interesting.

One of the problems with the Indian languages is most of them (excepting maybe Tamil and a few others) are dialects. At the same time, the development of these languages have been stilted for various reasons. In the ancient times, Sanskritisation hampered their growth, then came the domination of Persian languages through the Moghul period, followed, of course by English over the last 400 years of colonialism.

The end result, all these languages have stayed in the past. Words are being formed today for modern use, but each language is woefully behind times and all attempts are already too late.

Most Indian languages are excellent in their own way for arts, but are completely useless for science. As TOI said, 'In an under-developed language system, thought processes will also remain underdeveloped. In modern knowledge societies, underdeveloped languages cannot produce advanced thought. The present Indian languages, including Hindi, are more underdeveloped than any European language of the early 18th century'

As we attempt to move forward, like the Europeans, we will be held back by our linguistic chauvinism. As we attempt to prove to ourselves that Tamil is better than Hindi which is better than Telugu, as a nation, we will just get side stepped. Within the country, control of knowledge will be held by a Elitist few, and as this group gets smaller, our incompetencies will only grow.

I see indications of these already. You teach Engineering in Tamil and what happens - you get a road with a manhole jutting 6 inches above! How do you teach Oracle in Malayalam? How do you compute or write code properly when you cannot even understand the basic nuances of the language?

As a exporting nation, we are way way behind China in the manufacturing sector. Our feeble command over English has give us some advantages over other countries in the services sector - BPO, auditing, accounting, editing, etc. But this is a very slender advantage that we might lose very quickly if we continue our linguistic chauvinism. The Eastern mindset may be good for Yoga and Ayurveda. It may be good for teaching how to maintain a balanced lifestyle. It can never help us send a rocket to the moon, which is what we are attempting to do. It can never help us create an engine that can give us 50kmpl, which is what our dire necessity.

Cheers

This is what I have been trying to get across all along (albeit with much fewer words). If you even see the latest government funded prolific UID project, it says very clearly that the database will be purely in English, along with all the systems on which it runs. I don't deny that Indian languages might be more "musical" etc. but unless they are self sufficient and have words for everything, they can/will never be used for serious stuff. Like Venkat said, it is sadly already too late.
 
Gobble, I don't want to start an argument, but what you said is very interesting.

One of the problems with the Indian languages is most of them (excepting maybe Tamil and a few others) are dialects. At the same time, the development of these languages have been stilted for various reasons. In the ancient times, Sanskritisation hampered their growth, then came the domination of Persian languages through the Moghul period, followed, of course by English over the last 400 years of colonialism.

The end result, all these languages have stayed in the past. Words are being formed today for modern use, but each language is woefully behind times and all attempts are already too late.

Most Indian languages are excellent in their own way for arts, but are completely useless for science. As TOI said, 'In an under-developed language system, thought processes will also remain underdeveloped. In modern knowledge societies, underdeveloped languages cannot produce advanced thought. The present Indian languages, including Hindi, are more underdeveloped than any European language of the early 18th century'

As we attempt to move forward, like the Europeans, we will be held back by our linguistic chauvinism. As we attempt to prove to ourselves that Tamil is better than Hindi which is better than Telugu, as a nation, we will just get side stepped. Within the country, control of knowledge will be held by a Elitist few, and as this group gets smaller, our incompetencies will only grow.

I see indications of these already. You teach Engineering in Tamil and what happens - you get a road with a manhole jutting 6 inches above! How do you teach Oracle in Malayalam? How do you compute or write code properly when you cannot even understand the basic nuances of the language?

As a exporting nation, we are way way behind China in the manufacturing sector. Our feeble command over English has give us some advantages over other countries in the services sector - BPO, auditing, accounting, editing, etc. But this is a very slender advantage that we might lose very quickly if we continue our linguistic chauvinism. The Eastern mindset may be good for Yoga and Ayurveda. It may be good for teaching how to maintain a balanced lifestyle. It can never help us send a rocket to the moon, which is what we are attempting to do. It can never help us create an engine that can give us 50kmpl, which is what our dire necessity.

Cheers


Too late, you already started it!! :D

Whether Indian languages are mostly dialects or other indian languages like Hindi are underdeveloped is highly debatable. Only linguist and mathematician can analyze. There are recorded observations of speakers of sanskrit who use a highly technical lingo that rivals the most obscure scientific journals of today, where words have very precisely intended meanings in a context. People at NASA have discovered that Sanskrit is like a formal language with constructs suitable for artificial intelligence. (NASA Sanskrit Report) Binary logic was invented in ancient India. (What business does a backward civilization have inventing such useless things)? So why should the original sanskritized Hindi be deficient? Or a heavily sanskritized language like Malayalam? Do you know that the seeds of Calculus came from the Madhavan school of mathematics in Kerala? (Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) Or read the book "Crest of the Peacock". The knowledge was carried to Europe by Jesuit priests where Leibnitz and Newton developed it further. Therefore it does not look like your view will hold much water.

That said, my statement about the benefits of Indian languages were based, not on scientific analysis but on attempts to understand some concepts where English clearly failed miserably and in a profound fashion. Also behind it is the knowledge that Europe was largely backwards and tailing Asia in technological progress until the turn of the 19th century. Most of you will read in great detail the day to day lives of a madam Curie or an Edison in school texts (and only about western minds whose photographs are hung all over the place) and be deluded that only the west brought scientific and technological progress. There is a subtle form of propaganda aided by active suppression of facts - of the Chinese and Indian legacy in scientific and technological knowledge. In this deluded ignorance, it will be hard to believe that Indians (and also the Chinese) experimented with electricity, metallurgy, mechanics, aeronautics, marine science, architecture, chemistry, botany, agriculture, zoology, hygiene, health, science of sound and voice measurement of time, science of scripting, Geometry etc. Indeed we owe the west modern science - measuring a charge, calling it a coulomb, etc etc, but most of us do not realize that the west in turn owes its progress to Asia in many fundamental ways. They surged suddenly ahead in the 18th - 19th century standing on the shoulders of technological giants like China (and India), just like we surge ahead on western science today. If you notice they were quite backward scientifically until around the time the meeting with the East occurred and the exchanges began. Borrowing inventions improving them adapting them, and in turn China or India excelling over western ingenuity - this kind of cross pollination across cultures was rampant. No single civilization can claim to have brought the gift of scientific progress to makind. However you will see the west always tries to claim so ... :D


In another thread I was very sarcastic about intellectual patents (and European ethics about it) because I see at the roots of this development - their quest to claim ownership for everything not theirs - from the land in America, to mis-appropriation of credit for many Chinese inventions and technological designs, and now they cry hoarse when the Chinese copy their designs and push at half the cost!! Its about politics for dominance disguised as ethics and morality - something they really succeed at befooling Indians with, given the west's (everything to the west of India i.e) history of repeat genocide up to the last decade :rolleyes: The truth very well may be - Asia has in history, almost always held the quality and cost advantage over Europe! Well mostly, with exceptions perhaps! :) This may not be a recent phenomenon!! Globalization may be some 1500 years old!! Europe only discovered it by chancing upon the sea routes in the last many centuries.



The other "pet style" of these propaganda pushers is to proclaim in advance repeatedly that all Indian pride is foolish pride, the stuff of the misty eyed romantic fool and wishful thinker motivated by that silly tribal instinct called patriotism. Sounds familiar? :D If a person researches history for a hobby he is bound to dwell on it and talk about it. He is then promptly labeled as a fool by those who want the Indian to forget his past, his legacy and transform him into a new Englishman, albeit a brown one. Because in the last 5000 years, India has been conquered only for a few centuries of the total time!! That too if you ignore glorious accounts of Arab travelers or "reliable" western sources (try a purely Indian source, do you know any?), it was never total and complete domination over all parts as claimed!! So this source of strength has to be squashed, no point killing people. How many will you kill? Already tried over the last 1000 years. What better technique than to get Indians to abuse themselves, their past, their legacy, their "dirty oppressive culture"? :D :ohyeah: ;)



When you research and discover the many instances where Indian manufacturing and technology surpassed over European ones as late as 18th to 19th century, the question will come begging - How can the people of a civilization with "deficient" languages (as you put it) achieve this? But I will leave that for you to ponder. When you actually discover for yourself about historical Indian Industry and why the per-capita income of Indian workers was greater than those in Europe up to the 18th century Or why European shipbuilding ("famous" for its historical naval exploits and might, but actually downright trivial and inferior compared to Chinese many many centuries before it) had to invoke protectionist measures at that time in the face of superior shipbuilding from (Edit:) mostly Mumbai and Dhaka. Then you will naturally ask - Where did the language to discuss technicalities of manufacturing, building and improving them to the point of exceeding build quality and durability over European products come from? In the absence of modern stress testing equipments or methods, how difficult it must be to observe and increase durability of Indian ships to last say a decade more than European ones?!! And in the absence of a technical language?!!!! Did they speak in English? Were there absolutely no workers from Tamilnadu coast in Dhaka? Or those from Bengal in Mumbai? How did these underdeveloped "imbeciles" manage to improve anything? Why was India (or her manufactured goods) the destination or aim that everyone made a beeline for in the last 1500 years? Why were historical Indian cities bigger better and more organized that Europeans ones? Where did the organization, town planning and architecture come from without a good faculty of language? If economic prosperity and well being of people is the ultimate aim did not Indian languages suffice then? Why not now?


You will see that the argument about deficiency of Indian languages falls flat in the face of more all round and holistic historical and socio-economic evidence. The only catch it it will take you years of dogged mental pursuit to explore the evidence for what I posted above!!


And I am afraid, the type of view-points you or alisarun express are the type nurtured very carefully through the tool of Propaganda. It is one that involves active suppression of India's true history and legacy besides repeatedly projecting books and magazine articles in the media limelight that push these flawed views . Like claiming that Indians learn almost everything from the Greeks Babylonians or Europeans on the basis of even more flawed assumptions (the argument against which you will be lucky to discover thanks to the propaganda machine). You will read one book after another very expertly exposing how vedic astronomical knowledge was all flawed the the expertise imaginary - and unless you are lucky you will not find that book that points out the mistakes in these other books. A never ending quest that will leave you forever in doubt about the past and the truth!! A systematic and sustained campaign since pre-independence mind you. Yes there are ancient Sanskrit books titled to mean "Astronomical knowledge of the Greeks", but does anyone know the oath of Hippocrates has a parallel and older origin in Ayurveda? Or that Budhayan gave the equivalent of Pythagoras theorem 2000 years before him? Documents are lost, there is no proof, so the absence of mathematical proof is construed that it was just a "somewhat unscientific" guess by an Indian, an anomaly. :D Oh wait! He must have been a Greek visitor !! (write a book with glowing reviews about it and fool the Indians who never look up references in the bibliography first hand)!!

Learning about the great Sankaracharya? Sooner than later the flaws in his philosophy will be pointed out and then you will start doubting - was he really a super mind and that great? Is there really much to Hinduism after all? Oh well, after many months at researching him, you will be lucky to realize that all the theories supposedly expounded by him actually came from secondary sources many centuries later, and he never said the many things purported to come from him, or that he never founded any monastic order (although all the muths claim he founded theirs exclusively), was a rationalist etc etc.(By this time you have lost faith in your past, no problem - that's what they want :)). We did not burn anybody because he said the Earth was round. The heliocentric model was predicted here, so was the mass of the earth correctly estimated to a few decimal places a 1000 years before Europe. If one doesn't know the wider dimensions about India's historical, plural cultural and economic past and how it really enabled and nurtured scientific thinking, it is easy to delude oneself into have such beliefs as you expressed about language. Because the logic of it all seems very rational if you start with flawed assumption accumulated over decades of brain-washing, ones that are too lengthy to be put in a brief post or usually simply taken for granted!


Coming back to propaganda (lets explore its dimensions), the other grave act of suppression that these propaganda "pushers" do is never talk about genocide over centuries which was on such a scale that the one is America's paled in comparison. Like giving orders to hunt, chase and kill every boy over 8 years in a conquered town immediately after a battle or piling heaps of skulls of non-believers. Gross punishment exceeding the crime was a regular occurrence. (For the skeptics I can quote the original sources from the books of Moghul courts. No numbers of course :)) I can only marvel at how scientific and technological progress happened at all in the face of sheer overwhelming and sustained acts of terror in ones life - seeing your neighbor beheaded or limbs chopped of, the appalling injustice of it all. Can anyone go back to finer intellectual pursuits after having experienced this or narrowly escaping this over a harrowing few days of hide and seek? The decline of scientific accomplishment in ancient Arab world with the rise of religion is well evidenced and documented but again suppressed - again you only hear the opposite!! What it also probably did in India was to ensure that over centuries the populations at large saw little development where science mattered. Progress was however ensured by the other greatly suppressed fact of history - A huge slave economy (that will shatter the myth of equality purported by the west) consisting of captured men and women who toiled under fear of death and insane hardships to make a well oiled economic engine running, for trade made famous with the rest of the world. How many know that the Bhangi caste (they carry excreta on their heads with bare hands) arose out of captured Mogul POWs being employed to clean and serve the harems? Imagine (gross) Kargil heroes captured today suffering the same fate? You have heard of Sati - The queens in Rajasthan committed what was seen as a noble act to save themselves from repeat violations and a lifetime of enslavement. How many of you know that epidemic of Sati in its worst form (like today's dowry deaths) in the 19th century was practiced by Anglo-Indians who lost their Hindu values? You want un-impeachable evidence? Ask me. Who gets the blame? Indian culture which had to be rescued by that British stooge Raja Ramohan Roy and the lessons for which are pushed down your throat in school textbooks!! But on that false pretext, paying homage to the Sati Goddesses in Rajasthan is banned!! Its exactly like banning all memorials in the name of or paying tribute to Kargil Martyrs!! Forget your history , or make them forget it!! Don't remember your past heroes lest future generations become inspired by them!!


Here it comes again in a more concise form - We are unscientific, backward, oppressive, hopelessly doomed to suffer due to some innate deficiency in our psycho-pathology and our civilization! sounds familiar? :D!! Another example, how many "proud" Goan's have heard the gory details of the Goan inquisition btw? If they knew what was done to their grandparents from day to day accounts they would stop feeling proud, become atheist and and never visit a "sacred" place of worship in their life for the next 10 generations!! But you may only read a dismissive summary at the best, if you try. And always with a clever twist repeated ad nauseum that Indian civilization has evil power structures and it is deficient in the more progressive aspects. Why is it that the average Indian never reads the truth about all this in spite of having read more than a few books on Indian history? Also if you look closely and notice further, you find that almost all Indian history writing is nothing but repeat acts of verdict passing on Indian civilization in many different ways, with many seemingly diverse viewpoints expressed but all ultimately dwelling with just one perspective - evil power structures oppressing the downtrodden!! Narrow minded, un-holistic, one track minds with an agenda that parallels that other major import form the west - Communism! Few English speaking Indians know that there is a towering intellectual with a stronger philosophical and intellectual foundation than a Marx or Engels or even Chomsky, with a more holistic approach towards transforming society than any European intellectual - Shri Aurobindo. Not an import from over there, but local from here, although he beats most Europeans in their own education and Latin . Nobody reads him, at best you will read a snide remark about him by puny minds who dare not challenge his view points head-on because they cannot finish his books - No thanks to the success of the propaganda machine :D. And oh yes!! The English speaking progressive minded modern "smartie" will never read his works as well even if his grasp of English is good enough - because he is not a approved character by his other trusted sources in the press and media. :ohyeah: He will read a lot of trash from lesser intellectuals of the west .. but Aurobindo? NEVER! Not even for the sake of intellectual pursuit. But rather than confess his shallow complicity in double standards, he will profess ignorance. Aurobindo who??!! :ohyeah:



Therefore is it really fair to blame Indian "culture" at all for its lack of scientific progress as compared to the west? The corrupt toll-gate and octroi mafia (read about tax collection in Mogul India) or the standards of policing today where innocents are tortured - the pattern in modern Indian society is an exact replica and continuation of how Indians were policed for centuries since 1000AD. There is a historical context for everything and India's problems are not as much cultural as a result of historical circumstances. For you will find that even in the very decade that every boy above 8 was slaughtered by the moguls, and the Goan inquisition happened, a ruler like Shivaji officially allowed the respective communities to setup their place of worship and practice their faith!! So that is but one example of how Indian society has room for corrections the moment conditions allow for it!! And without the moralizing and fake ethics preaching of the west with the accompanying shrill screeching that happens in media - all done with a vested agenda!! Do you think Shivaji did not know that such things happened? Yet, the paradox is that sections of people in society are made to be afraid of living in that fearsome possibility that might become a "Hindu Nation". That tribal instinct is repeatedly invoked by the very media you trust, the herd mentality made stronger by raising the specter of a threat to their existence from the majority, in the guise of protecting the minority from Indian culture!! Aaahem ...! What if they find that there is no real threat to them? They might stray into "ancient Indian territory" and explore their past!! :eek: Hence teach them to reject at all times, keep up the tempo with shrill screeching!! Cry Wolf!! :D The flock of sheep that herds together stay together:D!! Multiple agendas multiple goals all achieved by the Pot calling the Kettle black! :lol:


Anyways, I do not wish to dwell so much OT on this. The point of digressing was honestly to show the extent of propaganda, not score political points to an agenda. Those interested can research negationism in Indian history at your leisure. At the least read up on the Needham project that shows how much the world owes China for its technological marvels.


Fortunately in my intellectual domain these "pushers" have been identified (by other more accomplished thinkers), classified and tacked like flies moths and insects, their motives and innards examined. :) Unknown to the common English speaking citizen in India, there is whole world of intellectual ferment out there they have no clue about. Because these debates and criticism of the western view point of mala-fide intentions is kept out view by the syndicated scholarship of institutions controlled by the west or in the west, never cataloged for reference by future generations, never mentioned in academic periodicals. Pretend to sympathize but actually achieve your propaganda objective in the process .... Opposing viewpoints if any are only presented in a diluted form so the superior rationality of the western overseer ultimately triumphs in the debate. The average Indian English speaker watches CNN or BBC or visits crossword for his books and deludes himself into thinking he is a "modern" "progressive". But he is really a victim, easily fooled by the "pushers" for whom they queue up eagerly to swallow the sugar coated pill (Hyderabad fish medicine anyone? ;)). I know the trick, and here it is - first throw a lot of facts that look good to be true and win the readers trust. Once trust is implicit over time and the reader is a fan of the source of "analysis", slip in an untruth when attention is likely to waver, like at the end of a long text, when information overload is likely to result in the reader lowering his defenses. Repeated over time every which way you turn, every magazine, media channel, radio ... the fool starts believing it - "If everyone is saying it, it must be true!! I am a graduate, I have read a 100 books in my life, I know how to discern ..." but alas, the modern Indian who lives by the Western values is no better than the German of the 1940s. Of course the method is not perfect - You may pick up an article when credibility has not set in yet and immediately see the weakness or spot the mistakes. That is where the hope lies ... :)

If you go back to your statement, you may realize maybe in the next decade, that the foundations of the thinking are laid on a stack of cards, the palace game we play in childhood.

Unraveling it will take years and dedication.

Good luck in your quest - if you ever begin!

Edit: And Language chauvinism? Sorry I only speak English mostly 99% :D

PS: While you are reading up convinced about how benevolent the British empire was do also read up on the "victorian holoucast". Their moral stance to liberate the jews from Germany may come across as a joke ...

Forgot to post a good link : http://www.indianscience.org/essays/2- NEEDHAMQuestion-DPSameer-edit.pdf and http://www.riseofthewest.net/
One more: http://www.iisc.ernet.in/prasthu/pages/PP_data/105.pdf and yet one more (read the foreword on page 2 & 3): http://www.scribd.com/doc/10932365/Indian-Science-and-Technology-Before-the-18th-Century

From page 7 : "Contrary to what millions of us were taught in our school text-books, it indicated the existence of a functioning society, extremely competent in the arts and sciences of its day. Its interactive grasp over its immediate natural environment was undisputed; in fact, it demanded praise. This was reflected in both agricultural and industrial production. We know today that till around 1750, together with the Chinese, our areas were producing some 73% of the total world industrial production, and even till 1830, what both these economies produced still amounted to 60% of world industrial production."
 
Last edited:
Gobble, I don't want to start an argument, but what you said is very interesting.

One of the problems with the Indian languages is most of them (excepting maybe Tamil and a few others) are dialects. At the same time, the development of these languages have been stilted for various reasons. In the ancient times, Sanskritisation hampered their growth, then came the domination of Persian languages through the Moghul period, followed, of course by English over the last 400 years of colonialism.

The end result, all these languages have stayed in the past. Words are being formed today for modern use, but each language is woefully behind times and all attempts are already too late.

Most Indian languages are excellent in their own way for arts, but are completely useless for science. As TOI said, 'In an under-developed language system, thought processes will also remain underdeveloped. In modern knowledge societies, underdeveloped languages cannot produce advanced thought. The present Indian languages, including Hindi, are more underdeveloped than any European language of the early 18th century'

As we attempt to move forward, like the Europeans, we will be held back by our linguistic chauvinism. As we attempt to prove to ourselves that Tamil is better than Hindi which is better than Telugu, as a nation, we will just get side stepped. Within the country, control of knowledge will be held by a Elitist few, and as this group gets smaller, our incompetencies will only grow.

I see indications of these already. You teach Engineering in Tamil and what happens - you get a road with a manhole jutting 6 inches above! How do you teach Oracle in Malayalam? How do you compute or write code properly when you cannot even understand the basic nuances of the language?

As a exporting nation, we are way way behind China in the manufacturing sector. Our feeble command over English has give us some advantages over other countries in the services sector - BPO, auditing, accounting, editing, etc. But this is a very slender advantage that we might lose very quickly if we continue our linguistic chauvinism. The Eastern mindset may be good for Yoga and Ayurveda. It may be good for teaching how to maintain a balanced lifestyle. It can never help us send a rocket to the moon, which is what we are attempting to do. It can never help us create an engine that can give us 50kmpl, which is what our dire necessity.

Cheers

I have to admit I am shocked at seeing this post from you, Venkat.

That the languages were not used for 'scientific' notations and purposes surely cannot be the languages' fault can it?

Indians, as a people, have always been adapting. Perhaps too adapting for their own culture's good. When we are taught something new, we dont want to pass it on in our mother tongue to others. We like to learn the others' language and like to claim exclusivity. To try and make oneself elite through 'knowledge'.

No doubt it has served us in today's IT scenario with BPO's and what not mushrooming all over the place.

But it will be a grave oversight to say that all this resulted only because of some lacunae in our local languages. Much to the contrary it all points to a lack of pride in our culture and our blind worshipping of others' culture.

Europe will not stand for that. Or Iran. Or Iraq. They need for you to speak local lingo. Those are qualities to be appreciated. By all means, lets all learn English. But to say that English is superior to other languages is nothing but another form of linguistic chauvinism.

Lately a lot of stuff is being translated to Indian languages. And that can only help. It is not that these languages cannot handle science. Language is and always has been simply a medium. How we use them determines how they grow. After all has English not added hundreds of thousands of new words over the decades? Including words from the Indian subcontinent's languages.

Lastly - it is not that learning Engineering in Tamil is the result of our dilapidated road conditions :). Even when our engineers learnt in English, it was the same. What matters is the content. Not the medium.
 
The logic of the designer in choosing a character from 2 languages out of the official 20 odd languages, is itself a negative trait which should have been a strong reason for rejecting the design in the prelims itself.
Why couldn't they select an abstract symbol which would offend no other language speaker of the country?

and the proportions of the design too seem unbalanced.
It's top heavy with a weak base.
 
Too late, you already started it!! :D

Whether Indian languages are mostly dialects or other indian languages like Hindi are underdeveloped is highly debatable. Only linguist and mathematician can analyze. There are recorded observations of speakers of sanskrit who use a highly technical lingo that rivals the most obscure scientific journals of today, where words have very precisely intended meanings in a context. People at NASA have discovered that Sanskrit is like a formal language with constructs suitable for artificial intelligence. (NASA Sanskrit Report) Binary logic was invented in ancient India. (What business does a backward civilization have inventing such useless things)? So why should the original sanskritized Hindi be deficient? Or a heavily sanskritized language like Malayalam? Do you know that the seeds of Calculus came from the Madhavan school of mathematics in Kerala? (Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) Or read the book "Crest of the Peacock". The knowledge was carried to Europe by Jesuit priests where Leibnitz and Newton developed it further. Therefore it does not look like your view will hold much water.

That said, my statement about the benefits of Indian languages were based, not on scientific analysis but on attempts to understand some concepts where English clearly failed miserably and in a profound fashion. Also behind it is the knowledge that Europe was largely backwards and tailing Asia in technological progress until the turn of the 19th century. Most of you will read in great detail the day to day lives of a madam Curie or an Edison in school texts (and only about western minds whose photographs are hung all over the place) and be deluded that only the west brought scientific and technological progress. There is a subtle form of propaganda aided by active suppression of facts - of the Chinese and Indian legacy in scientific and technological knowledge. In this deluded ignorance, it will be hard to believe that Indians (and also the Chinese) experimented with electricity, metallurgy, mechanics, aeronautics, marine science, architecture, chemistry, botany, agriculture, zoology, hygiene, health, science of sound and voice measurement of time, science of scripting, Geometry etc. Indeed we owe the west modern science - measuring a charge, calling it a coulomb, etc etc, but most of us do not realize that the west in turn owes its progress to Asia in many fundamental ways. They surged suddenly ahead in the 18th - 19th century standing on the shoulders of technological giants like China (and India), just like we surge ahead on western science today. If you notice they were quite backward scientifically until around the time the meeting with the East occurred and the exchanges began. Borrowing inventions improving them adapting them, and in turn China or India excelling over western ingenuity - this kind of cross pollination across cultures was rampant. No single civilization can claim to have brought the gift of scientific progress to makind. However you will see the west always tries to claim so ... :D


In another thread I was very sarcastic about intellectual patents (and European ethics about it) because I see at the roots of this development - their quest to claim ownership for everything not theirs - from the land in America, to mis-appropriation of credit for many Chinese inventions and technological designs, and now they cry hoarse when the Chinese copy their designs and push at half the cost!! Its about politics for dominance disguised as ethics and morality - something they really succeed at befooling Indians with, given the west's (everything to the west of India i.e) history of repeat genocide up to the last decade :rolleyes: The truth very well may be - Asia has in history, almost always held the quality and cost advantage over Europe! Well mostly, with exceptions perhaps! :) This may not be a recent phenomenon!! Globalization may be some 1500 years old!! Europe only discovered it by chancing upon the sea routes in the last many centuries.



The other "pet style" of these propaganda pushers is to proclaim in advance repeatedly that all Indian pride is foolish pride, the stuff of the misty eyed romantic fool and wishful thinker motivated by that silly tribal instinct called patriotism. Sounds familiar? :D If a person researches history for a hobby he is bound to dwell on it and talk about it. He is then promptly labeled as a fool by those who want the Indian to forget his past, his legacy and transform him into a new Englishman, albeit a brown one. Because in the last 5000 years, India has been conquered only for a few centuries of the total time!! That too if you ignore glorious accounts of Arab travelers or "reliable" western sources (try a purely Indian source, do you know any?), it was never total and complete domination over all parts as claimed!! So this source of strength has to be squashed, no point killing people. How many will you kill? Already tried over the last 1000 years. What better technique than to get Indians to abuse themselves, their past, their legacy, their "dirty oppressive culture"? :D :ohyeah: ;)



When you research and discover the many instances where Indian manufacturing and technology surpassed over European ones as late as 18th to 19th century, the question will come begging - How can the people of a civilization with "deficient" languages (as you put it) achieve this? But I will leave that for you to ponder. When you actually discover for yourself about historical Indian Industry and why the per-capita income of Indian workers was greater than those in Europe up to the 18th century Or why European shipbuilding ("famous" for its historical naval exploits and might, but actually downright trivial and inferior compared to Chinese many many centuries before it) had to invoke protectionist measures at that time in the face of superior shipbuilding from (Edit:) mostly Mumbai and Dhaka. Then you will naturally ask - Where did the language to discuss technicalities of manufacturing, building and improving them to the point of exceeding build quality and durability over European products come from? In the absence of modern stress testing equipments or methods, how difficult it must be to observe and increase durability of Indian ships to last say a decade more than European ones?!! And in the absence of a technical language?!!!! Did they speak in English? Were there absolutely no workers from Tamilnadu coast in Dhaka? Or those from Bengal in Mumbai? How did these underdeveloped "imbeciles" manage to improve anything? Why was India (or her manufactured goods) the destination or aim that everyone made a beeline for in the last 1500 years? Why were historical Indian cities bigger better and more organized that Europeans ones? Where did the organization, town planning and architecture come from without a good faculty of language? If economic prosperity and well being of people is the ultimate aim did not Indian languages suffice then? Why not now?


You will see that the argument about deficiency of Indian languages falls flat in the face of more all round and holistic historical and socio-economic evidence. The only catch it it will take you years of dogged mental pursuit to explore the evidence for what I posted above!!


And I am afraid, the type of view-points you or alisarun express are the type nurtured very carefully through the tool of Propaganda. It is one that involves active suppression of India's true history and legacy besides repeatedly projecting books and magazine articles in the media limelight that push these flawed views . Like claiming that Indians learn almost everything from the Greeks Babylonians or Europeans on the basis of even more flawed assumptions (the argument against which you will be lucky to discover thanks to the propaganda machine). You will read one book after another very expertly exposing how vedic astronomical knowledge was all flawed the the expertise imaginary - and unless you are lucky you will not find that book that points out the mistakes in these other books. A never ending quest that will leave you forever in doubt about the past and the truth!! A systematic and sustained campaign since pre-independence mind you. Yes there are ancient Sanskrit books titled to mean "Astronomical knowledge of the Greeks", but does anyone know the oath of Hippocrates has a parallel and older origin in Ayurveda? Or that Budhayan gave the equivalent of Pythagoras theorem 2000 years before him? Documents are lost, there is no proof, so the absence of mathematical proof is construed that it was just a "somewhat unscientific" guess by an Indian, an anomaly. :D Oh wait! He must have been a Greek visitor !! (write a book with glowing reviews about it and fool the Indians who never look up references in the bibliography first hand)!!

Learning about the great Sankaracharya? Sooner than later the flaws in his philosophy will be pointed out and then you will start doubting - was he really a super mind and that great? Is there really much to Hinduism after all? Oh well, after many months at researching him, you will be lucky to realize that all the theories supposedly expounded by him actually came from secondary sources many centuries later, and he never said the many things purported to come from him, or that he never founded any monastic order (although all the muths claim he founded theirs exclusively), was a rationalist etc etc.(By this time you have lost faith in your past, no problem - that's what they want :)). We did not burn anybody because he said the Earth was round. The heliocentric model was predicted here, so was the mass of the earth correctly estimated to a few decimal places a 1000 years before Europe. If one doesn't know the wider dimensions about India's historical, plural cultural and economic past and how it really enabled and nurtured scientific thinking, it is easy to delude oneself into have such beliefs as you expressed about language. Because the logic of it all seems very rational if you start with flawed assumption accumulated over decades of brain-washing, ones that are too lengthy to be put in a brief post or usually simply taken for granted!


Coming back to propaganda (lets explore its dimensions), the other grave act of suppression that these propaganda "pushers" do is never talk about genocide over centuries which was on such a scale that the one is America's paled in comparison. Like giving orders to hunt, chase and kill every boy over 8 years in a conquered town immediately after a battle or piling heaps of skulls of non-believers. Gross punishment exceeding the crime was a regular occurrence. (For the skeptics I can quote the original sources from the books of Moghul courts. No numbers of course :)) I can only marvel at how scientific and technological progress happened at all in the face of sheer overwhelming and sustained acts of terror in ones life - seeing your neighbor beheaded or limbs chopped of, the appalling injustice of it all. Can anyone go back to finer intellectual pursuits after having experienced this or narrowly escaping this over a harrowing few days of hide and seek? The decline of scientific accomplishment in ancient Arab world with the rise of religion is well evidenced and documented but again suppressed - again you only hear the opposite!! What it also probably did in India was to ensure that over centuries the populations at large saw little development where science mattered. Progress was however ensured by the other greatly suppressed fact of history - A huge slave economy (that will shatter the myth of equality purported by the west) consisting of captured men and women who toiled under fear of death and insane hardships to make a well oiled economic engine running, for trade made famous with the rest of the world. How many know that the Bhangi caste (they carry excreta on their heads with bare hands) arose out of captured Mogul POWs being employed to clean and serve the harems? Imagine (gross) Kargil heroes captured today suffering the same fate? You have heard of Sati - The queens in Rajasthan committed what was seen as a noble act to save themselves from repeat violations and a lifetime of enslavement. How many of you know that epidemic of Sati in its worst form (like today's dowry deaths) in the 19th century was practiced by Anglo-Indians who lost their Hindu values? You want un-impeachable evidence? Ask me. Who gets the blame? Indian culture which had to be rescued by that British stooge Raja Ramohan Roy and the lessons for which are pushed down your throat in school textbooks!! But on that false pretext, paying homage to the Sati Goddesses in Rajasthan is banned!! Its exactly like banning all memorials in the name of or paying tribute to Kargil Martyrs!! Forget your history , or make them forget it!! Don't remember your past heroes lest future generations become inspired by them!!


Here it comes again in a more concise form - We are unscientific, backward, oppressive, hopelessly doomed to suffer due to some innate deficiency in our psycho-pathology and our civilization! sounds familiar? :D!! Another example, how many "proud" Goan's have heard the gory details of the Goan inquisition btw? If they knew what was done to their grandparents from day to day accounts they would stop feeling proud, become atheist and and never visit a "sacred" place of worship in their life for the next 10 generations!! But you may only read a dismissive summary at the best, if you try. And always with a clever twist repeated ad nauseum that Indian civilization has evil power structures and it is deficient in the more progressive aspects. Why is it that the average Indian never reads the truth about all this in spite of having read more than a few books on Indian history? Also if you look closely and notice further, you find that almost all Indian history writing is nothing but repeat acts of verdict passing on Indian civilization in many different ways, with many seemingly diverse viewpoints expressed but all ultimately dwelling with just one perspective - evil power structures oppressing the downtrodden!! Narrow minded, un-holistic, one track minds with an agenda that parallels that other major import form the west - Communism! Few English speaking Indians know that there is a towering intellectual with a stronger philosophical and intellectual foundation than a Marx or Engels or even Chomsky, with a more holistic approach towards transforming society than any European intellectual - Shri Aurobindo. Not an import from over there, but local from here, although he beats most Europeans in their own education and Latin . Nobody reads him, at best you will read a snide remark about him by puny minds who dare not challenge his view points head-on because they cannot finish his books - No thanks to the success of the propaganda machine :D. And oh yes!! The English speaking progressive minded modern "smartie" will never read his works as well even if his grasp of English is good enough - because he is not a approved character by his other trusted sources in the press and media. :ohyeah: He will read a lot of trash from lesser intellectuals of the west .. but Aurobindo? NEVER! Not even for the sake of intellectual pursuit. But rather than confess his shallow complicity in double standards, he will profess ignorance. Aurobindo who??!! :ohyeah:



Therefore is it really fair to blame Indian "culture" at all for its lack of scientific progress as compared to the west? The corrupt toll-gate and octroi mafia (read about tax collection in Mogul India) or the standards of policing today where innocents are tortured - the pattern in modern Indian society is an exact replica and continuation of how Indians were policed for centuries since 1000AD. There is a historical context for everything and India's problems are not as much cultural as a result of historical circumstances. For you will find that even in the very decade that every boy above 8 was slaughtered by the moguls, and the Goan inquisition happened, a ruler like Shivaji officially allowed the respective communities to setup their place of worship and practice their faith!! So that is but one example of how Indian society has room for corrections the moment conditions allow for it!! And without the moralizing and fake ethics preaching of the west with the accompanying shrill screeching that happens in media - all done with a vested agenda!! Do you think Shivaji did not know that such things happened? Yet, the paradox is that sections of people in society are made to be afraid of living in that fearsome possibility that might become a "Hindu Nation". That tribal instinct is repeatedly invoked by the very media you trust, the herd mentality made stronger by raising the specter of a threat to their existence from the majority, in the guise of protecting the minority from Indian culture!! Aaahem ...! What if they find that there is no real threat to them? They might stray into "ancient Indian territory" and explore their past!! :eek: Hence teach them to reject at all times, keep up the tempo with shrill screeching!! Cry Wolf!! :D The flock of sheep that herds together stay together:D!! Multiple agendas multiple goals all achieved by the Pot calling the Kettle black! :lol:


Anyways, I do not wish to dwell so much OT on this. The point of digressing was honestly to show the extent of propaganda, not score political points to an agenda. Those interested can research negationism in Indian history at your leisure. At the least read up on the Needham project that shows how much the world owes China for its technological marvels.


Fortunately in my intellectual domain these "pushers" have been identified (by other more accomplished thinkers), classified and tacked like flies moths and insects, their motives and innards examined. :) Unknown to the common English speaking citizen in India, there is whole world of intellectual ferment out there they have no clue about. Because these debates and criticism of the western view point of mala-fide intentions is kept out view by the syndicated scholarship of institutions controlled by the west or in the west, never cataloged for reference by future generations, never mentioned in academic periodicals. Pretend to sympathize but actually achieve your propaganda objective in the process .... Opposing viewpoints if any are only presented in a diluted form so the superior rationality of the western overseer ultimately triumphs in the debate. The average Indian English speaker watches CNN or BBC or visits crossword for his books and deludes himself into thinking he is a "modern" "progressive". But he is really a victim, easily fooled by the "pushers" for whom they queue up eagerly to swallow the sugar coated pill (Hyderabad fish medicine anyone? ;)). I know the trick, and here it is - first throw a lot of facts that look good to be true and win the readers trust. Once trust is implicit over time and the reader is a fan of the source of "analysis", slip in an untruth when attention is likely to waver, like at the end of a long text, when information overload is likely to result in the reader lowering his defenses. Repeated over time every which way you turn, every magazine, media channel, radio ... the fool starts believing it - "If everyone is saying it, it must be true!! I am a graduate, I have read a 100 books in my life, I know how to discern ..." but alas, the modern Indian who lives by the Western values is no better than the German of the 1940s. Of course the method is not perfect - You may pick up an article when credibility has not set in yet and immediately see the weakness or spot the mistakes. That is where the hope lies ... :)

If you go back to your statement, you may realize maybe in the next decade, that the foundations of the thinking are laid on a stack of cards, the palace game we play in childhood.

Unraveling it will take years and dedication.

Good luck in your quest - if you ever begin!

Edit: And Language chauvinism? Sorry I only speak English mostly 99% :D

PS: While you are reading up convinced about how benevolent the British empire was do also read up on the "victorian holoucast". Their moral stance to liberate the jews from Germany may come across as a joke ...

Forgot to post a good link : http://www.indianscience.org/essays/2- NEEDHAMQuestion-DPSameer-edit.pdf and The Rise Of The West
One more: http://www.iisc.ernet.in/prasthu/pages/PP_data/105.pdf and yet one more (read the foreword on page 2 & 3): Indian Science and Technology Before the 18th Century

From page 7 : "Contrary to what millions of us were taught in our school text-books, it indicated the existence of a functioning society, extremely competent in the arts and sciences of its day. Its interactive grasp over its immediate natural environment was undisputed; in fact, it demanded praise. This was reflected in both agricultural and industrial production. We know today that till around 1750, together with the Chinese, our areas were producing some 73% of the total world industrial production, and even till 1830, what both these economies produced still amounted to 60% of world industrial production."

Dear Gobble,
I do not think any of us here have any problem with our glorious past.
Many of us here are only vexed about our present and the future. All other discussions are just academic in nature. Not of much value except for folks for whom delving into them is a hobby.

Now you may have your own notions on HOW this future has to be shaped based on your own philosophies and belief systems. Please note that OTHERS too have their views on this. They may not really agree with your views.

Hence topics and discussions like this is a complete waste of time on public forums where people of different walks of life and philosophies arrive. Please save it for a session with friends who think like you. :)

Please note that I do not have any argument about your views about the truth about our history and how folks have distorted it. I am in complete in agreement.

Since this is very OT, I digress.
 
Last edited:
Dear Gobble,
I do not think any of us here have any problem with our glorious past.
Many of us here are only vexed about our present and the future. All other discussions are just academic in nature. Not of much value except for folks for whom delving into them is a hobby.

Now you may have your own notions on HOW this future has to be shaped based on your own philosophies and belief systems. Please note that OTHERS too have their views on this. They may not really agree with your views.

Hence topics and discussions like this is a complete waste of time on public forums where people of different walks of life and philosophies arrive. Please save it for a session with friends who think like you. :)

Please note that I do not have any argument about your views about the truth about our history and how folks have distorted it. I am in complete in agreement.

Since this is very OT, I digress.

And how did you assume it is complete waste of time for EVERYONE reading this or who might later on?!!! :)

No further need for arguments :ohyeah:

-G
 
And how did you assume it is complete waste of time for EVERYONE reading this or who might later on?!!! :)

No further need for arguments :ohyeah:

-G

I am sure folks who take to this as a hobby will find the thread interesting.

Some of us will just ignore the provocative statements and consequent pompous proclamations in the guise of self-effacing verbose diarrhea. No time or inclination for a long-winded tryst !
 
Last edited:
Gobble, it will take me a long time to read through all the material you have provided. But a quick glance only fortifies what I said. Please read through what I am writing to understand my conclusions.

At the outset, no one denies that India was a great civilisation some 1500 years ago. Our advancements in science of technology of those days made us a prosperous society that was looked at with jealousy by rest of the world. As travel started, this knowledge reached other shores, and this jealousy turned to violence against us. Having become an advanced society we lost the power and will to defend ourselves. Over years the Persians and British forced themselves on us and we forgot what we knew. That violence of a large nature did not reach below the Vindhyas was only an act of geography.

As you yourself mentioned, successive years of oppression completely hid whatever knowledge we had.

From the links you have provided I show below two important extracts.

(1) Discussing the slow decline of advanced thinking in India and comparing it to Arabic knowledge, A Rehman quotes the following reasons:

1(a) During the period India remained an agricultural society, no new challenges came up to create new knowledge to help solve new problems. The two major developments apart from the field of arts and crafts were in the area of paper technology and the development of military weaponry technology, but no theoretical development could take place.

1(b) Scientific activity and knowledge, by and large, remained a preserve of the elite, while arts and crafts remained with the less privileged groups.

1(c) The pluralistic tradition of Hinduism, whereby different philosophies continued to coexist, as the faith failed to generate a unified pursuit of knowledge.

1(d) Religious prejudices and linguistic arrogance may have also come in the way of evolution of a single tradition.

1(e) The philosophic and theoretical framework being different, the Vedic logic on one hand and the Ptolemaic, the Euclidean and the Aristotelian logic on the other, became a major block, since both were associated with religion. The pressure of the conservatives was too much to discard the overall framework to create and develop a new integrated tradition.

1(f) It also appears that two different processes continued to operate during the period: one towards the integration of the two traditions, and the other at keeping them apart.

1(g) Lack of institutionalisation of education was also a handicap.

1(h) Change of dynasties and kings with different approaches to knowledge even within a dynasty also came in the way of continuous growth of institutions and spread of knowledge within an institution.

In all these points, what strikes me as important are the following:

  • that we had linguistic arrogance from early stages in our evolution as a society
  • that we never had a unified system for development and sharing of knowledge
  • that things only got worse as Moslem and Christian ethics started dominating our society
  • that (and this is important) we never found a way of preserving, developing, and distributing our knowledge within ourselves.

(2) On the same lines, Udgaonkar gave a few explanations and I am interpreting them in my own way.

2 (a) Otherworldliness of the Indian Society.

This is somewhat inevitable. As a society progresses and feels scientific knowledge has peaked, thinkers get bored and start turning their attention to other activities. If controlled properly these activities are usually in the form of arts such as music, dance, etc. Of all the people, Nehru points out that 'in India, we find during every period when her civilisation bloomed, an intense joy of life and nature, a pleasure in the act of living, the development of art and music, literature, song and dancing, painting and the theatre, and even a highly sophisticated inquiry into sex relation.' In my mind Nehru's thinking is very important and to a large extent responsible for our downfall. With such a thinking, it never occurred to Nehru that, after 400 or more years of suppression, we had actually gone backwards in terms of own capabilities to create and distribute knowledge. On the false perception that we were an advanced society as far as scientific knowledge goes, Nehru tried to build a new society on top of it. Nehru forgot that we were an agrarian society and that we were a nation of traders. Focusing on manufacture and the socialists regime completely wiped out our past.

And we are paying the price for this stupidity even today. Thinkers like J Krishnamurthy advised people to think inwards and propagated the importance of 'maya', and relationship between men and women. We forgot that we have to reinvent ourselves as a thinking and working society where scientific knowledge is important, something the Japanese did with great aplomb after WWII.

2 (b) Suppression of scientific spirit.

In 1100 AD or thereabouts, the Indian society had free thinking that was supported both by religion and by the rulers. Compartmentalised into sects that did their own job, knowledge was gathered and used successfully. Since Indian was an agrarian society, the use of this knowledge for the common man was limited. Knowledge and scientific thinking was thus reduced to a few that was handed down over generations. There was very little documentation and knowledge was kept limited to a small percentage of the society.

Move on to 1947 when we got free. What did we do? Instead of setting the foundations for helping science progress, we focused on becoming a manufacturing society. We set up just one IISc and multiple IIT's and scores of polytechnics. We develop a country of people who can turn lathes and drilling machines.

2 (c) Conflict between science and religion.

Udgaonkar spells this extremely well. Though unlike the Western culture where science and religion were at logger heads, in India, science and religion co-existed. But something strange happened. Scientific thinking up to a certain stage were canonised, and people were told all knowledge is available in the 'Vedas'. Questioning and research that are so important for science was stilted in a different way. This led to stagnation of scientific thought.

There are other factors such as complacency, social rigidity and invasions. The net effect is that scientific thinking in India stopped more than 500 years ago. Mind you, I am talking about scientific thinking on a scale that will positively affect the society in a continuous manner. Consequently, there had has been no major inventions or discoveries that can be attributed to India in the recent past.

Moving forward what do we do is the question. Let us assume we have an intelligent administration that wants to inculcate scientific thinking and development in a sustainable manner. Let us also assume that it decides Sanskrit is going to be the medium used for this activity. This will set us back by some 100 odd years. How? Even assuming Sanskrit is a language suitable for mathematics and artificial intelligence, it will take us, as a society, at least 50 years of sustained effort to bring out a version of Sanskrit that we can effectively use across the country. And it will take us another 50 odd years to create and generalise all the associated systems where this version of Sanskrit can be effectively used for computing, knowledge storage, database management, etc. And after all this, it will take us another 50 years to translate the current scientific knowledge available in the world. Even if we take on some of the tasks in parallel, it will take us at least 100 years before we can ourselves look at the language as a viable alternative.

Believe me, the dialects of these base languages that we use for communication have no chance. Thinking that any of the current Indian languages can be used for scientific thinking or use is just wishful thinking. More important, given the linguistic arrogance that various states have been happily propagating, getting even 50% of the population to speak, read, and write a single language will never happen.

Even assuming we do all this, how are we going to communicate with the world? It will take us another 100 years after these activities to create enough scientific advances that will make the rest of the world look at us.

If we use English, even if we achieve nothing which is most probably what we will do, we will save at least 200 years of wasted efforts.

Cheers
 
Sqaure_wave, my aplogies. BUT, this discussion, at least to me, is of an advanced nature and well worth the effort.

Cheers
 
Sqaure_wave, my aplogies. BUT, this discussion, at least to me, is of an advanced nature and well worth the effort.

Cheers

Of course.

The intelectual discourse is not the problem.

"Provocative statements and consequent pompous proclamations in the guise of self-effacing verbose diarrhea" is the problem.

There is a difference !

I read through what you have written. Very well written without any veiled agendas or tunnel vision. Great reading. Mostly agree with what you have written. I wish I had the kind of free time like you have on your hands.
 
Last edited:
While decidedly being off topic, I think this is a very good discussion. For what it is worth.

Venkat - I must again disagree in principle to your projected '200 years wasted' concept. I am with you on the linguistic chauvinism part. About elitism and a few other points.

But that point 1b about arts and crafts staying with the lower sections of society that does not strike me as truth.

Lets take one step deeper though. All your points - bar none - emphasize the point that it is not any lacunae in Sanskrit or any of the various dialects that is stopping them from being effective with science, mathematics or for that matter any sphere of knowledge.

It is our disenchantment and total lack of pride in our vestiges of culture that has led to the status quo. Again, there can be various reasons for that. And we can go round and round theorizing on it.

I sincerely hope that professors and linguists and other experts do not give up on our languages as lost hopes. As bygones of an earlier age and good only for the odd colloquial use until English catches on at all levels of society.

We really need to strengthen our mind and do something purposeful with respect to our languages. They deserve better. What if it takes 50 or 100 years? The question we have to ask is if it will help in preserving 1000's of years of culture, tradition and collective knowledge. It is part of us. Of India and 'Indianness'. We cannot just give up like that.

About translation not working because we dont have a common language across the country, why not have these important works translated into each of the languages that are in vogue in every one of our States? The trick, I believe is in getting each State to believe in the endeavour. If it is centrally controlled, it is bound to fail - as we have seen earlier. After all there has to be a way to use this language chauvinism to the favour of the language itself!
 
Of course.

The intelectual discourse is not the problem.

"Provocative statements and consequent pompous proclamations in the guise of self-effacing verbose diarrhea" is the problem.

There is a difference !

I read through what you have written. Very well written without any veiled agendas or tunnel vision. Great reading. Mostly agree with what you have written. I wish I had the kind of free time like you have on your hands.

Square_wave - did you notice anything which fits the phrase that I have highlighted above in your post? Asking only because I did not notice any such :).
 
But that point 1b about arts and crafts staying with the lower sections of society that does not strike me as truth.

It is possible that Mr. A. Rehman's choice of words were wrong. I think what he meant was lower strata/sections in terms of intellect - not in terms of standing in society.

Lets take one step deeper though. All your points - bar none - emphasize the point that it is not any lacunae in Sanskrit or any of the various dialects that is stopping them from being effective with science, mathematics or for that matter any sphere of knowledge.

It is our disenchantment and total lack of pride in our vestiges of culture that has led to the status quo. Again, there can be various reasons for that. And we can go round and round theorizing on it.

You are correct, but I would say the main reason is our diversity in culture and languages. We were ruled by a large number of Maharajas each one of whom had his own agenda. This is very similar to what happened in Europe. In spite of common root in Roman or Latin, each country in Europe moved inwards with it's own language. So why did German or French not become prevalent as did English? This is to a large extent because of the extent of the British Empire, and later on the emergence of the US as a major force in the world.

Similarly, though we had a common root in Sanskrit and maybe Tamil in the south, the Rajas were not interested in pushing any one language as the common language of choice for science and technology. That is what I meant about complacency. When you have the money and a bit of prosperity, you focus on arts, and there is no pressure to look for progress.

Then of course, we were ruled by others for 400 or more years. When we did get independence, the Nehru dynasty were completely clueless as to what they were doing and allowed the diversity to prevail and strengthen.

I sincerely hope that professors and linguists and other experts do not give up on our languages as lost hopes. As bygones of an earlier age and good only for the odd colloquial use until English catches on at all levels of society.

Have they not already done so? Who talks about the beauty of Sanskrit more than others? German scholars through Max Mueller Bhawan. If there is any push for local languages, it is for book writing, communication, and the arts. Not for science, not for social growth.

We really need to strengthen our mind and do something purposeful with respect to our languages. They deserve better. What if it takes 50 or 100 years? The question we have to ask is if it will help in preserving 1000's of years of culture, tradition and collective knowledge. It is part of us. Of India and 'Indianness'. We cannot just give up like that.

Pride and respect for which language, Bala? Our very diversity of which we boast is our undoing with regards to unity in language. Look at this thread itself. Did we all even take a bit of pride in the fact that we have a sign for our currency? What we did was to start banging the design as lopsided, as being pro-Hindi, that Tamil would have been better and so on.

About translation not working because we dont have a common language across the country, why not have these important works translated into each of the languages that are in vogue in every one of our States? The trick, I believe is in getting each State to believe in the endeavour. If it is centrally controlled, it is bound to fail - as we have seen earlier. After all there has to be a way to use this language chauvinism to the favour of the language itself!

Yes this may work. But then it will become a dangerous trend where each linguistic group will demand freedom from the federation. In addition to religion, lifestyle and other factors, language will become one more factor for these die-hards to work towards separating themselves from the federation. The recently held World Tamil Congress is such a indication. Radio stations suddenly insisted that people calling use only Tamil words for what they wanted to say. Thankfully the 'zest' died in a few days.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
come one brothers its our currency its looking good yaar i'm in proud that finally we r getting a symbol :cool: it is cool symbol simple and sober i like things simple and sober :)

jai hind
 
Last edited:
Venkat - with this last post of yours I think we agree more than we disagree.

I just dont think that adopting English as our de facto national language or even mother tongue is the right way to go. In fact other than being totally detrimental to any of our existing rich and diverse set of languages, it could also end up sparking the end of a cultural era as it were.

Are we not richer for the old folklore and stories that were told in our mother tongue by our grandparents? Can all of this be moved to English? And if it is, will it still have the same impact? You know how much of the essence is lost from writing/telling during translation. So I dont need to tell you. In fact humour can hardly be translated.

It is easy to discard those languages that we have not really put to use. And yes it is tougher by far to update them - because we have let them go into this dilapidated condition ourselves. So we are at that proverbial crossroads. The future depends on which side we go.

I am just sad because day by day it is seemingly clear which choice will be made.
 
You are absolutely correct, Bala. To a certain extent some thinkers did think intelligently when they wrote the constitution. That is how the two language formula was proposed and accepted. Use your mother tongue to keep in touch with your past, and English to move forward. Unfortunately, our state administrations did not implement this properly. Instead of teaching and using English and the mother tongue all around, they switched to teaching literally everything in the mother tongue in the non-urban areas. Incorrect histories were quickly cooked up and taught. Science, other than very basic concepts were completely ignored. Simple things like road sense were completely forgotten. Incompetent people wrote books. You should see some of syllabus being taught in rural areas.

When kids pass out from such schools and try to adjust into an urban society, there is chaos. Being the vote bank, the state governments just look the other way as they resort to strikes and violence to overcome their weakness. When I mentioned about lacuna in engineering, I was referring to the incompetencies that are accepted in this method of teaching.

Believe me, this will only get worse. The intelligentsia and thinkers will leave the country. The governments will force these incompetent people into all walks of life through quotas and other political weapons. Once they start to learn how to amass wealth and misuse it, the will be no end to the misery this society will see.

I already see signs on the roads, Cops not bothered. Courts looking for settlement rather than justice. As Delhi grew, farmers in Gurgaon and other areas suddenly had loads of cash in their hand. With idle time on hand, they took to drinking and mindless violence and bribing the cops to stay out of jail. The Reddys in AP openly steal from the land and the Government protects them. Incorrectly educated people form violent gangs using political support as a show of strength. As traffic increases and cops step back, violence on the streets will increase.

I shudder to think of the future of this country.

Cheers.

PS. Just to give you an idea of the rot, please check out this article. When I heard it I just could not believe it. In most countries this would be considered an act of treason.
 
Last edited:
2.5 lakhs for designing the symbol of our future is rather miserly.If people can be paid 1 crore for answering a juvenile set of questions on television,if cricketers,footballers,tennis players can be paid obscene sums for what essentially amounts to hitting/throwing/kicking a ball then D.U.K. certainly deserved a crore!

Hmmm - have you tried to make it to one fo the professional leagues in the hitting/throwing/kicking category?

I am not saying that players are not paid through the nose for their contributions but at the same time you don't have to trivialise it.
 
I shudder to think of the future of this country.

Same here. The fact is that -no matter how much money you make/have here-, no matter how rich you get, you'll never live a good life. You'll still have to live with the broken roads (the bigger the car, the more you'll be punished), selfish, petty, uneducated people, pollution, rudeness, filth, and if you live in urban areas- basically nowhere to go other than "malls" etc.. etc. In a recent survey it was revealed that the richest people in India actually donate the least (they've already realized that the money they give the government goes nowhere). Edit: Also did you guys know that India has been importing water? From Alaska, no less? http://www.treehugger.com/files/201...-of-gallons-of-water-from-alaska-to-india.php
 
Last edited:
Get the Wharfedale EVO 4.2 3-Way Standmount Speakers at a Special Offer Price.
Back
Top