• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Is A CD Player Really Better Than A DVDP For Stereo Music?

Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
372
Likes
72
Points
0
Location
Mumbai
Bold statement? It's the plain and simple truth.
I have tried a few combinations in the run up to building the system. I certainly feel a difference with a dedicated CDP. The plain and simple truth is yet to encounter me; maybe i am walking backwards.
 
SPONSORED ADS

SPONSORED ADS

KDM

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
428
Likes
41
Points
0
Location
India
An eyeopener indeed :) Wonder what these people were thinking! Not to mention the foolish components that make up this awful stack.
You do know what they say about snake oil, don't you?

I have tried a few combinations in the run up to building the system. I certainly feel a difference with a dedicated CDP. The plain and simple truth is yet to encounter me; maybe i am walking backwards.
You're telling me that you can make out the difference between a CD player and a DVD player connected digitally to a receiver? Perhaps you have ears made of the finest gold, which some of us mere mortals lack, perhaps that's why the plain and simple truth eludes you. Or perhaps my ears are made out of the worst tin, that's why I clearly hear the plain and simple truth.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
372
Likes
72
Points
0
Location
Mumbai
You're telling me that you can make out the difference between a CD player and a DVD player connected digitally to a receiver?
I would like to correct you. My statements were in response to your claims that the digital signal stream is the same whether it comes from DVDP or CDP. There is no AVR in this argument of yours.

Yes, i can make out a difference between a digital out from a DVDP and a CDP,

and why so much anguish about golden and tin ears. If you cannot make out a difference, i think you should stay happy since you are not slipping on snake oil like others are.
 

KDM

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
428
Likes
41
Points
0
Location
India
I would like to correct you. My statements were in response to your claims that the digital signal stream is the same whether it comes from DVDP or CDP. There is no AVR in this argument of yours.
No there wasn't BUT the context was about connecting a CD player to an AV receiver digitally, when we were discussing this a few posts earlier, was it not?

Also, can you prove that different players produce different data streams - which was your argument, wasn't it? Are there any papers on this (and not by the snake oil guys)?

Yes, i can make out a difference between a digital out from a DVDP and a CDP,
Okay. If you say so. :)

and why so much anguish about golden and tin ears. If you cannot make out a difference, i think you should stay happy since you are not slipping on snake oil like others are.
Oh I'm happy, all right!

But do you not think that the poster wanting to know whether it sounds the same or not should actually hear the CD player first on his receiver and see if he hears a difference or not before he puts down his 20K on a player? After all, it's his 20K, not yours or mine.
 
Last edited:

shershah

New Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
173
Likes
30
Points
0
Location
between the devil and the deep sea
hear the CD player first on his receiver?
a dedicated (and good) cd player should not be allowed to waste its potential - how? - by not connecting it to an av receiver -

if one is passionate about two-channel stereo reproduction using a cd player - then it must needs be connected to a dedicated pre-amp/power-amp or a good integrated- and real passion would involve independent (equal) amplification for both the channels.

this discussion about connecting a cd player to an av receiver - and the comparisons that follow - are not mainstream
 

KDM

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
428
Likes
41
Points
0
Location
India
a dedicated (and good) cd player should not be allowed to waste its potential - how? - by not connecting it to an av receiver -

if one is passionate about two-channel stereo reproduction using a cd player - then it must needs be connected to a dedicated pre-amp/power-amp or a good integrated- and real passion would involve independent (equal) amplification for both the channels.


this discussion about connecting a cd player to an av receiver - and the comparisons that follow - are not mainstream
I would agree with you. But the poster wanted to know if it would make a difference a few pages back.
 

alz_tcr

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
14
Likes
2
Points
0
Location
Thrissur, Kerala
a dedicated (and good) cd player should not be allowed to waste its potential - how? - by not connecting it to an av receiver -
Well, its a start... Might buy an Int.Stereo amp later on..

if one is passionate about two-channel stereo reproduction using a cd player - then it must needs be connected to a dedicated pre-amp/power-amp or a good integrated- and real passion would involve independent (equal) amplification for both the channels.
I just want to enjoy my music dude.. besides, 90% of my music is made up of Mp3s( ripped @ 320 kbps as far as possible), which i transfer to a pen drive and connect to the DVDp USB. So, a dedicated pre-amp/power-amp is quite expensive for now (as far as i am concerned) and thats why i was apprehensive about a dedicated CDp. But still, I wud lik to make the best of a recording when I am in the mood for an 'audiophile' listening session :)

But do you not think that the poster wanting to know whether it sounds the same or not should actually hear the CD player first on his receiver and see if he hears a difference or not before he puts down his 20K on a player? After all, it's his 20K, not yours or mine.
Thanks man! I think i shud listen to it and judge for myself :)
 

vinyl

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
18
Likes
1
Points
3
Location
Bhubaneswar
Re: ? Is CD Player really make difference over DVD Player for Stereo Listening?? nvas

This has been discussed many times before but let me recap.

1. The number of pits that make a bit/byte is much more in a DVD as compared to a CD. Consequently, a DVD read/write head has to move in smaller steps to read the larger number of data pits. How does this matter? By the simple fact that a read head is a electromechanical device and is always prone to making errors. While reading from a CD, it could skip a few pits giving you erroneous data.

2. The amount of electronics in a CD player is much less, again leading to lesser interference.

3. A DVD player does not have a very good DAC, as it is expected that the decoding and DAC conversion will be done externally. A CD player, on the other hand, has a very good DAC as it mostly sends analogue data.

4. Given the price and the amount of material inside, a CD player is usually made of better parts. Some of the companies such as Cyrus make their own drives. A DVD player is a mass market item, and in general is just assembled from outsourced items. Though Pioneer is an excellent DVD player, if you open it, you will find more third party labels than Pioneer inside.

5. A DVD player has a short life cycle in terms of design and technology. A CD player, on the other hand is usually designed to last for 5 years or more.

Enough? Of course, whatever I am saying makes sense if you are serious about music. As Spiro and other have said, companies such as CA, Oppo and others have made DVD player that double up as excellent CD players also. I use my Oppo 983 only for playing music.

If I remember right, someone is selling a Oppo 981H for 8K. That is an excellent purchase.

Cheers
The comparision here is primarily between the mass market dvd player vs a dedicated hi fi cd player. What I have felt is that most of the mass market dvd players sound somewhat harsh in comparision to hifi cd players. A cd player's audio output is much better, clean and smooth.

Now amongst the mass market players, Onida dvd player's audio output is good, infact much better than the other mass market dvd players. But unfortunately, Ondia is perhaps not manufacturing dvd players any more. Since it is not possible for all music lovers to be able to buy hifi cd players, one has to contend with a dvd player, and Onida is a good choice if it is still available.

Here a question arises, how do the boom box cd players from Philips / Sony, sound in comparision to dvd players. Boom boxes do not have rca outputs, so the headphone out has to be used, and again all boom boxes do not have headphone outs. Headphone outs also have problems with impedance matching with the line in of amplifiers. But if somehow a boom box cd player can be connected to the line in of an amplifier, then I think the result will be better than what one gets from using a dvd player.

A 16 bit dac will produce better results than a 24 bit dac.

Those who are technically well versed can throw more light.
 
Last edited:

sudhirbhosale

Active Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Messages
240
Likes
29
Points
28
Location
Hyderabad / Mumbai
Re: ? Is CD Player really make difference over DVD Player for Stereo Listening?? nvas

1. Now amongst the mass market players, Onida dvd player's audio output is good, infact much better than the other mass market dvd players.

2. But if somehow a boom box cd player can be connected to the line in of an amplifier, then I think the result will be better than what one gets from using a dvd player.

3. A 16 bit dac will produce better results than a 24 bit dac.
Thanks vinyl for the info.
Have some questions.
1. If Onida DVD player produce good output, then how about Pioneer?
2. What is Boom box CD player?
3. A 16 bit dac will produce better results than a 24 bit dac. ---- Why and How?

Thanks
 
SPONSORED ADS
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
20
Likes
12
Points
0
Location
Coimbatore
Science and Technology behind the operations of a CD player and DVD / Bluray player are same. I also believed that my Pioneer BDP-170 Bluray player (Cost about (16,000/-) is doing the best when I started using it.
One of my friends strongly suggested to take a look at a dedicated CD Player for my Audiophile setup. I tried and got surprised. The CD Player I bought is Yamaha CD-N301 Natural sound network CD player. It is producing amazing sound out of it. This is what the practical observation I did. I always used to try both digital out (co-axial and optical) and analog outs.

So, CD players are made for CD music. where DVD and Bluray players are having additional sections like video, surround processing etc., and made for HD and 3D video and more in addition to the Audio. Also they literally need television screen to select menus and configuring settings. Very slow in detecting audio CD tracks and heavy latency in switching between tracks.

low-end bluray players cost about 8,000/- are even worse in playing Audio CDs. Pioneer BDP series bluray players are well known for their sound quality. But, not always better than dedicated CD players. That is the reason why the dedicated CD Players are so costlier than bluray players even though they don't have video/surround section circuits.

An year back I was also searching in this forum to know whether my bluray player is enough or not. But, after experiencing a dedicated CD player, I have concluded that CD player cannot be practically replaced with DVD and /or bluray players.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
37
Likes
11
Points
8
Location
Tirupur
Science and Technology behind the operations of a CD player and DVD / Bluray player are same. I also believed that my Pioneer BDP-170 Bluray player (Cost about (16,000/-) is doing the best when I started using it.
One of my friends strongly suggested to take a look at a dedicated CD Player for my Audiophile setup. I tried and got surprised. The CD Player I bought is Yamaha CD-N301 Natural sound network CD player. It is producing amazing sound out of it. This is what the practical observation I did. I always used to try both digital out (co-axial and optical) and analog outs.

So, CD players are made for CD music. where DVD and Bluray players are having additional sections like video, surround processing etc., and made for HD and 3D video and more in addition to the Audio. Also they literally need television screen to select menus and configuring settings. Very slow in detecting audio CD tracks and heavy latency in switching between tracks.

low-end bluray players cost about 8,000/- are even worse in playing Audio CDs. Pioneer BDP series bluray players are well known for their sound quality. But, not always better than dedicated CD players. That is the reason why the dedicated CD Players are so costlier than bluray players even though they don't have video/surround section circuits.

An year back I was also searching in this forum to know whether my bluray player is enough or not. But, after experiencing a dedicated CD player, I have concluded that CD player cannot be practically replaced with DVD and /or bluray players.
Very detailed explanation. Thanks.
 

preth30

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
111
Likes
40
Points
28
Location
Kochi
There are some DVD playerrs which sound very good, but generally dedicated audio cd players sound better than DVD players.
 
SPONSORED ADS