Review...!!! JVC-RX900

theironhorse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
2,389
Points
113
Location
Hyderabad.
Just got my JVC RX-900 2 days back and burn-in still going.. done with 30 hours or so... here i go with a short review. Folks dont mind if its in layman language and lesser "techno audio jargon" for i am still learning the vocab of the same. The review is completely based what i felt through my PMP's as no decent PC sound card available neither a DAC / headphone amp.

Got them through a friend travelling from U.S.

Model : JVC HA -RX900
(listed price 99.95 $) market price 50$-55$

let the pics do the talking first..few initial impressions then.

dscf4047.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4051b.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4052g.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4056c.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4057j.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4058b.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03

dscf4060h.jpg

By theironhorse at 2012-01-03


setup used : sansa clip - jvc (no amp)
iphone 4 - jvc (no amp)
itouch - jvc (no amp)

most of the songs played flac around 80% and review based on the same.
tried mp3 as well 128/192/320kbps as well but a smaller part to check how it responds.

The rating i will be giving is in cinsideration that these sell around 50$ and relative headphones for similar price or marginally higher price.

BUILD : 1st word was HUGE...!!! still tempting.. no way portable..but well built. the plastic is feels good and matt finish.i am a bit biased here i love matte finish it feels nice and neat. the complete set is has been put up together and nothing rattles. did not figured out anything flimpsy. the head band is a strong metal strip inside covered by the same platicky material as the rest of the headphone though you cna easily dent the top bend as there is a slight slack between the metal rod for the clamping force and the platic sheilding(nutin to worry) it still is very well build for a 50$ headphone maybe even for a 70$.

giving it a 7/10 for the build quality and not a 10 after that huge praise as i am afraid that the chrome pinstriping on the outshell will fade away with time and though the material feels good and real neat it can get scratched very easy. i already have 2 so far though kept it very carefully. Solution : if you keep your car/bike polishes.. use the dashboard/leather polish. foam based and its back to its velvety touch.

cable is around 3 metre and good quality and the insulation feel very nice rubbery no sticky and no static. its even better than the M50's. The 3.5 MM jack is clean and debris free and looks nice however not the same with the phono jack given as accesory. the finish isin't that good. would have been better if it was buffed before they gold plated it.

COMFORT : This is where itself the RX900 justified its price. Remember i mentioned they are huge. the earcups are soft and plush and gets the cushion effect around the ear though not leather but say synthetic leather. Feels good and can cover ever bigger ear size for my collegue tried them too he is 6.4. had a good fit. the upper end of the cups is like a pocket and the ear can slide in. Get cozy. overall very comfortable and can be used for hours at a stretch.
along with the head band we got a similar head strip that rest on the head giving 3D support as the clamping force is way too lesser than other HP's i have used and that makes it the happening stuff for longer audio sessions.

the earcups can swivel 20 degree left-right (pan) around 30 degree up- dpwn. i give them a 9/10 for comfort and not able to figure any other headphone that will this comfort though people who want to carry them for portable use tick it off the list but it will certainly attract people on your desk.

SOUND ISOLATION ( THESE ARE CLOSED ) : For the similar reason stated in the comfort section. Cups are huge and plush and maintain a very good seal and adapt the shape aorund the ear providing good isolation.No outside nosie whatsoever. this makes the bass more punchy (oops this needs to come in next section). good sound isolation though we got a vented grill on the outshell and hence bit sound leak(very minimal). giving it a 8/10 for the same and no cable noise. no rattling.

SOUND : this is important..!!! they are certainly warm sounding HP. no way close to neutral but its enjoyable. soundstage is great for a closed headphone even better than the HP around 100 $ or so and I mean it. Now the question : do they really prove what they were famous for ? THE BASS :
well mixed thoughts.. they are capable of going real low but after trying headphones thrice the price of these they haven't got the slam but they are not boomy its a enjoyable bass though sometimes extending to the low-mid range and hence a warmer tone. instrument seperation is good. imaging and resolution i will say decent.
Mids are real real crisp however laid back and I like that for I dont like on the face presentation
Highs were sharp initially now settled after 30 hours. no longer shrill and handling high pitch female voice very well along with the CYMBAL of the percussion.
clean and not muffled ( again dont try listening to percussion using mp3.. dont even think.. every thing is monophonic you will go years back)

i guess bass needs another para for it follows a pattern guess i am feeling so or probably it will settle down after 30 more hours.
when tried flac through sansa few songs it really did well again few of them it missed the slam it should have had as i know what the song sounds like.
when tried mp3/aac over iphone 4 which were quite inferior compared to flac loassless the drums sounded awsome and very natural.. oh i can i miss this term. they sounded woody. i cudn't get through sansa but i mentioned it earlier in another post that sansa is not capable of driving these to full power. iphone was hence diffrence in bass. they go low and slam and will be fun to watch movies with action scenes but missed that hard and fast slam.. metallica fans.. these are not for you..

giving them a 7/10 as few people have even done mods to the same and added dynamat which considerably gave them the slam and made the soundstage a lot better without bothering the other aspects of sound quality . Manufacturers can also R&D the same add another 10$ and sell ver 2.0 i am ready for that rather than opening them up myself for atleast next 2 months.. they are new. :(

VFM : Got them around 2900 rs for these days dollar seems to trippin on somethin. It's high...
Are they worth 3k ?? HELL YEAH...!! every bit of them.
they sell in india for around 4000-4200 odd . Still worth ??? Not quite sure as Senn HD448 are on the way costed 4K cant comment if
these will surpass them. selected 448 over 428 as they are bass heavy. RX900 will make 428 cry for the bass. 448 4k .. wait for another week
till then we have a winner for a 3k headphone.


For those who are bored with all my BAKAR.If you listen to music over PC with a SC else a PMP with an decent HP Amp and looking forward to clear mids,deeper bass like laid back and warmer tone.3k nutin better than them and trust me at even 150$ ATH M50 cannot beat the soundstage of this.


if you a die hard fan of hard metal /electronic /industrial music these wont be justifying each slam you would need from the drum as they aren't punchy like M50 and neither on the face like GRADO's (they are good for rock music) these arent for you for u have a pocket around 7k-8k. If the pocket is around 3k-4k or so we have something that a no brainer.

Posting few songs that i tried as i heard them over n over to write whatever my ears felt.
Nadaan parinday(Rockstar)flac 995 Kbps SR : 44100 Hz. (sansa clip) stock firmware. got rockbox but havent tried JVC on rockbox yet.

the inital drums surrounds everywhere. sounds natural though feel bit supressed.
vocal sound natural.Bass extending upto low mid's but ultra smooth. Stereo seperation is really good.

O'Mama KK acoustic (slow) mp3 320kbps.

mids are crisp. it beats the M50's here in this particular song though again not overall quality.
being warmer the 5 string of the guitar sounds like 6th at some fred notes.. i know how the the 5string sounds so m sure for this one.
percussion is good but after listening to flac the soundstage is tighter on mp3 and sounds seems suppressed.

same song with clinton cerejo.. the background score is a bit muffled.. again culprint can be the underpowered Sansa. though muffled compared to flac
but for someone who havent heard heard flac side by side this is bliss..

DARUDE : why this song ?? the initial drums go around the head and can be good to check the sounstaging and seperation of the HP, speakers.
yeah i got slam in these.. bass is getting smoother every hour of usage.. no fatigue not overpowering..

papa kehte hain : 148Kbps :
due to the good sounstaging even this sounded balanced but the clear mids sometimes makes you realize that you need a better source. treble went a lil shrill and bass sounded .. dont wanna say but a bit muffled.

PHIR MOHABBAT murder 2 : 248Kbps.. this song is all about the depth and imaging and stereo seperation..it excelled so far doing justice at 3k. every penny spent well and background score of ultra low frequency gives a aura of its own.. it goes real low.... said it before...and not boomy.

RAIN OVER ME : PLANET PICT : flac : mark anthony sounded a lot better on this compared to my M2's they are over the face.. first 3 seconds of the song.. bliss.. flac being better source the bass goes punchy than the lousy bit muffled bass over the 320Kbps mp3... i am giving signs of not using mp3...lolz :) :)

adele: rolling in the deep : 320Kbps : oh its good.. the tone change from that husky tone to the elongated extension to high pitched voice.. did fairly well but messed up the drums.. they lost the natural beats. more the plasticky... instrument seperation is just okies for this particular song..

sadda haq : flac : soundstage was very important for this song for the way it was recorded...yeah...givin me a smile.. though it will nowehere stand close to the grado's soundtage for they being open cans.. guitar sound nice, drums are punchy while mids continues to be recessed but the background percussion could have been better..

Sak Noel : loca people : this song is real punchy and good to test. did fairly well but missing the hardest slam.. i am not getting it.. the M2's (dynamic driver) gives better slam but you can't hear that all day all night..

david guetta : akon :sexy b*** : this thing vibrates too.. yeah the cosy ear cub vibrates.. damn girl... smoother bass. stop.

SUNOH : lucky ali : lucky ali's mysterious voice sounds better with the warmer touch though the mp3 again messed with the rest besides the vocals..

zombie: the cranberries : flac : female voice is right beside my head drums are all over and the cymbal is heavier on the right ear. maybe the recording.
again they arent neutral so dont expect bliss in this but the soundstage and seperation covers up the rest.

few more on flac like tu hi re , joan osborne (what if god was one of us), choti si asha , chupse se (saathiya) , nahin samne too ( taal) and few more where vocals are more prominent than the music itself sounds great so overall this is a killer HP for mids and smoother bass as none of these had slamming bass but smoother low end all over and they sound just perfect.

the song that really made this HP worth everything. Rammstein- Engel..the female vocals are mesmerising.. i dont understand a word out of that russian stuff.. oh boy m sold.. yeah its are playing right now over my head while I type..


I got a long list to keep going but lets summing it up... its a lot more than VFM HP at 50$ it will beat many hp around 80$ - 90$. this is purely my personal opinion and i belive that the soundstage will be better with the headphone amp/good sound card and bit more punchy bass.

yet to receive the senn 448 they are around same price.. lets see how they fare against these...
 
Last edited:
Croma Jubilee hills was selling Senn 448 for 3.4k during diwali. Cheaper than lower end HPs of sennheiser itself!!

I asked for reasoning, The answer I got was "They are in offer sir (!!)".

Not sure if they still have them in stock.
 
many thanks TIH for this ! i think now i can see clearer what to grab. and since you already told me (plus you've mentioned it here too -"....metallica fans these are not for you...."), i'll give these a skip and get the punchier M50. an investment for some time to come :)

P.S. - sorry if i didnt mention it earlier anywhere. i listen to all kinds of music EXCEPT hip-hop, death/black metal, and cosy-mushy candyfloss romantics (be they of bollywood origin or the firangi ones). i guess i will enjoy the melodiously heavy 'san francisco symphony & metallica' massage on my ears with the M50 ;)

UPDATE : I just read that the RX900 requires a good amount of burn-in period. you'll have to be patient with them, and may be gift us with another short 'post burn-in' feedback.
just kidding (on the 2nd review part) :)
 
Last edited:
many thanks TIH for this ! i think now i can see clearer what to grab. and since you already told me (plus you've mentioned it here too -"....metallica fans these are not for you...."), i'll give these a skip and get the punchier M50. an investment for some time to come :)

P.S. - sorry if i didnt mention it earlier anywhere. i listen to all kinds of music EXCEPT hip-hop, death/black metal, and cosy-mushy candyfloss romantics (be they of bollywood origin or the firangi ones). i guess i will enjoy the melodiously heavy 'san francisco symphony & metallica' massage on my ears with the M50 ;)

M50 are a league apart.. though the mids are cleaner in jvc but the overall SQ of M50 makes them more enjoyable.. the fit and finish is lot more with leather over the cups.. its lavish man..

they sound more natural.. bass does not goes as low as jvc but balanced and punchy. soundstage is tighter than the jvc.. that one place where it excels with a bigger margin but M50 are able to handle almost any kind of music with ease..


it will certainly not be fair to compare the two when the price is 3 times of the JVC and M50 are highly regarded..

they are sold as studio monitor and hence more neutral whereas JVC have colouration though on a positive note.. they are enjoyable but not suitable for every kind of music...

you can also look for grado's as they sound pretty good with rock/metal for on the face presentation and lively soundstage. though they are open back but again open backs are all together diffrent..

by next year wish to setup a rig with a good headphone amp and ortho headphones.. maybe the fostex TP..
 
Last edited:
a decent comparo will be between the senn 448 and rx900 for they are similarly priced.. lets see who gets the award..
 
UPDATE : I just read that the RX900 requires a good amount of burn-in period. you'll have to be patient with them, and may be gift us with another short 'post burn-in' feedback.
just kidding (on the 2nd review part) :)


oh certainly i will and will try to update the prominent changes...
but then i will burn-in both 448 and 900 for a longer time and then update..
 
yes certainly the price difference between the M50 and RX900 itself makes one feel comparison between the two isnt justified. earlier i was all set for M50, but a friend of mine, as usual, spoilt my mind by suggesting the RX900 instead of the M50, and hence i had to take this longer route. i checked up comparison with grado's SR60 too, but M50 got more favour over the net. will check up with SR80i now. thanks again !

UPDATE : ok, so a quick look later, am slashing off grado's too from the list. they are 'over-the-ear' HPs, and i seriously dislike this design.
so finally, am set now. ATH-M50, am waiting for you eagerly now.... :clapping:
 
Last edited:
yes certainly the price difference between the M50 and RX900 itself makes one feel comparison between the two isnt justified. earlier i was all set for M50, but a friend of mine, as usual, spoilt my mind by suggesting the RX900 instead of the M50, and hence i had to take this longer route. i checked up comparison with grado's SR60 too, but M50 got more favour over the net. will check up with SR80i now. thanks again !

UPDATE : ok, so a quick look later, am slashing off grado's too from the list. they are 'over-the-ear' HPs, and i seriously dislike this design.
so finally, am set now. ATH-M50, am waiting for you eagerly now.... :clapping:


M50's are good anyday but keep them with desktop use with your xonar. else if PMP's then pick up a amp for the same. same goes with rx.. wil try to update the senn 448 impressions soon received them today.

grado are again no comparison coz they are open back but they have a sound note that M50's cant match. again its personal liking.

if you can drive down till pristine note try the grado's there as you will be using them at home with pc. Try the sr80i's if budget permits they are good for rock music.
 
M50's are good anyday but keep them with desktop use with your xonar. else if PMP's then pick up a amp for the same. same goes with rx.. wil try to update the senn 448 impressions soon received them today.

grado are again no comparison coz they are open back but they have a sound note that M50's cant match. again its personal liking.

if you can drive down till pristine note try the grado's there as you will be using them at home with pc. Try the sr80i's if budget permits they are good for rock music.

SR80i's design worries me. am not in good terms with that 'over-the-ear' design ;)
but would surely check it out at pristine note if i happen to purchase it from him than from the US (although i once had pestered him for the audition of a PMP and then didnt buy from him, but hopefully he doesnt remember it anymore :D)
a forum member at digit kindly shared his feedback on his M50 bought from pristine note a few months back. following is what he has to say :


for Audio Technica M50, I have quite some words to say.
I have heard that AD700 sounds on par with M50 (almost) but the bass is very low compared to M50. So I chose the M50. Now, I am not a basshead, but I do like bass. I used to have a Sennheiser HD437 before the M50. I thought the bass was sufficient enough on that one. M50s have the same, or lesser amount, but better bass. And the good thing is it can be Eq'd pretty well. When I want some headbanging bass, I use the EQs on my Cowon J3 (as it has amazing EQing options) and it literally bangs against my head.
On normal mode, the bass is enough to satisfy normal listening.
Now coming to mid range, the mids are a bit recessed on the M50s. Not too much, but still enough to make you take notice. Even though I find it satisfying enough, but I keep thinking that the mids might have been more forward in the song I'm listening. But still, they are pretty great.
Now the highs are pretty detailed, and leave behind my Klipsch X10i in detail. I used to like the highs on the Klipsch very much (and they are praised for the highs everywhere), but the M50s sound much more satisfying.
Get the M50s, and a good source, and be amazed. Remember, the headphone can be only as good as the source.

Hope I helped.


the underlined part is pretty exciting for me, since am expecting the HP to sound much to my liking with the xonar DX's wonderful EQ options.
 
Last edited:
sure it is :D

my pocket's lighter by 5389/- now :eek:



thats quite a figure though if gaming is our passion and you wanted it.. price dosen't matter.. enjoy your new HP... do update about the surround aura it creates.. would want to know if with actual 5.1 the soundstage is good...
 
sure....give me another day or two.....though my first impression is that in gaming, the soundstage is your whole virtual world ! infact, i should say it pits you right in the action-scene. as i described in my feedback in the 'battlefield 3' case, the 'thunder run' mission, it ACTUALLY feels like you are out on the desert terrain of tehran driving your armour. you have to really don these HPs and listen to them for a while to believe me !
but then i also felt that this soundstage goes narrow a bit in the movies, and still narrower in music. but about the movies, i should not open my mouth large as i havent yet checked it in depth. i read about dark knight, that the movie, and esp. the few moments of the opening scene have such a level of detail that it wont be easy for you to put the HP down. i will check this now in more detail with movies, and games other than FPS, and would let you know.
 
hello !

this is my lousy attempt at writing the feedback for the kave. hope you find it helpful

[ALF] Roccat Kave 5.1Ch. Headset : A First-person Perspective Feedback [ALF] - Digit Technology Discussion Forum

sorry for the double post :eek:
 
Wharfedale Linton Heritage Speakers in Walnut finish at a Special Offer Price. BUY now before the price increase.
Back
Top