It's not Teflon, but FEP plastic which has a dielectric of 2.15, while PE has dielectric of 2.2 - close enough. The weave geometry is different and is meant more to keep capacitance and inductance low. The Iconocast has dual pair weaved geometry to achieve this. In my case I have used twisted pair and have again twisted the +/ - polarity to keep mutual inductance and parasitic capacitance low. My cable has a lower capacitance of 70 pF than Iconocast for the same length. Inductance is just 5 uH for entire length of 4 meters.Hari, how’s what is being discussed in the articles close to telephone wire design? To begin with he recommends Teflon as dielectric. Also the geometry of the iconoclast cable design is so different. Velocity of propagation is discussed. Cables that we use do not have vp of 87. Nordost is the other cable that attaches a lot of importance to velocity of propagation. Microwave cables like Gore have high vp. Or am I missing something?
I don't know how to measure the VP
The copper wire diameter is same at 0.020" (0.5mm) as in Iconocast. The copper purity is 99.7% drawn from rod electrode cathode, where as Iconocast is 99.99% pure copper. The main difference is the Iconocast uses 24 + 24 core wire and I use 8 + 8 core wire. For my puny amp of 6 Watts per channel its should be good enough.
Last edited: