Dear HFV-mates,
I'm torn between these two great sat-sub packages. Both are priced close, share same technology (passive radiators), similar sized (well almost), similar power handling (well, again almost - :indifferent14: ProCinema 800 handles 50% more).
Actually, going by tech-specs the ProCinema 800 beats Aego-T hands down:
Satellite:
150w vs 100w max; 4.5" woofer vs 4" woofer; aluminum vs textile dome tweeter; sensitivity 89 vs 86 (dB for 1w@1m); dedicated center channel vs all identical channels.
Sub-Woofer:
300w vs 200w; compact vs big-n-heavy.
That's on the paper. However, going by the audition, I'm kind of split! (done at different dealer spot with different AVRs - couldn't do it with Denon 1910 that I'm planning to buy
).
Anybody who owns / extensively heard / knows about these speakers, please pitch in with your experience. Suggestion / advise from others also welcome.
Thanks.
I'm torn between these two great sat-sub packages. Both are priced close, share same technology (passive radiators), similar sized (well almost), similar power handling (well, again almost - :indifferent14: ProCinema 800 handles 50% more).
Actually, going by tech-specs the ProCinema 800 beats Aego-T hands down:
Satellite:
150w vs 100w max; 4.5" woofer vs 4" woofer; aluminum vs textile dome tweeter; sensitivity 89 vs 86 (dB for 1w@1m); dedicated center channel vs all identical channels.
Sub-Woofer:
300w vs 200w; compact vs big-n-heavy.
That's on the paper. However, going by the audition, I'm kind of split! (done at different dealer spot with different AVRs - couldn't do it with Denon 1910 that I'm planning to buy

Anybody who owns / extensively heard / knows about these speakers, please pitch in with your experience. Suggestion / advise from others also welcome.
Thanks.