Srinivasa Rao
Active Member
Hi guys may be an off topic. Where in Bangalore can we take demo of 4K projector either BenQ or Epson. Guys please help.
Lack of true 4K is the sole reason I am still holding off buying Epson 9400. Wondering whether I should wait out 6 months more, Epson surely would be releasing some better model by then.But I'm unable to digest the fact that it is not true 4k and go ahead with Epson tw7100 even though it has better picture. I'm torn between tw7100 and BenQ w2700.
My enquiries say that not in near future such a plan is there as it's expensive for true 4k.even sony 4 k is available at double the cost but with marginal benefits compared to 9400Lack of true 4K is the sole reason I am still holding off buying Epson 9400. Wondering whether I should wait out 6 months more, Epson surely would be releasing some better model by then.
But my understanding is that there is difference between true 4K and native 4K. Lot of people get confused about this. Benq 4K projectors are true 4K with pixel shifting technology achieving 4 times of 1080p resolution and Epson projectors pixel shift twice, whereas JVC and Sony have native 4K resolution which is way way expensive. This is my understanding, correct me if I am wrong.My enquiries say that not in near future such a plan is there as it's expensive for true 4k.even sony 4 k is available at double the cost but with marginal benefits compared to 9400
Even benq also not true 4k.its technology makes us look like 4k.only true 4k projectors available are JVC which are 4.5 +l.rest all technology driven mimicking 4k.what pleases our eyes is important.But my understanding is that there is difference between true 4K and native 4K. Lot of people get confused about this. Benq 4K projectors are true 4K with pixel shifting technology achieving 4 times of 1080p resolution and Epson projectors pixel shift twice, whereas JVC and Sony have native 4K resolution which is way way expensive. This is my understanding, correct me if I am wrong.
That's right. Both BenQ and Epson use only 1080p chip to simulate 4K images, however BenQ's simulation is closer to actual 4K as compared to Epson (which is closer to 2k)Even benq also not true 4k.its technology makes us look like 4k.only true 4k projectors available are JVC which are 4.5 +l.rest all technology driven mimicking 4k.what pleases our eyes is important.
Thats what I heard too. I think we should hear sometime in Jan/Feb about what incremental benefits may be there in next model of Epson. Maybe even if not true 4K, they can make it slightly more sharper than its currently. I will be OK with just simulation of all 4K pixels like BenQ.My enquiries say that not in near future such a plan is there as it's expensive for true 4k.even sony 4 k is available at double the cost but with marginal benefits compared to 9400
Epson has lens memory and automatic shutter control alsodefinetly the epson 9400 is better choice over the DLP counter parts. I had the oppurtunity to Demo the epson 9400 but did not want to strech my budget so settled for UHD50x without a demo. The epson was much more sharper compared to Uhd50x despite half the pixels. Must be due to the lens. The contrast of 9400 is really good. I should have taken the 9400
Between, any new 4k models expected from BenQ to increase brightness and contrast on par with Epson.Thats what I heard too. I think we should hear sometime in Jan/Feb about what incremental benefits may be there in next model of Epson. Maybe even if not true 4K, they can make it slightly more sharper than its currently. I will be OK with just simulation of all 4K pixels like BenQ.
What does it basically do? I also read on AV forums that Epson tw9400 has problems with lcd dust accumulation and in some cases power port failure.Epson has lens memory and automatic shutter control also
Does your Optoma have a focus uniformity/uneven focus issue?Look at optoma uhd50x 4k projector personally using it and it's really nice.
BenQ has already announced next line of projectors. No change in brightness/contrast. They just added media playing capabilities (Made projector "smart"), that too with increased prices. Not worth it.Between, any new 4k models expected from BenQ to increase brightness and contrast on par with Epson.
Priced how much more?Cheapest native 4k PJ is the Sony 270ES, priced a bit more than the Epson 9400 ( 6050 in the US )
Sony is in a different league when compared to Epson. The 270ES ( 295ES outside ) is a wonderful Projector.
In India compared to 9400 it's double the cost but with less features.positive thing is it's native 4kPriced how much more?
That would make Sony 4K nearly 4 lakhs? That's too much!In India compared to 9400 it's double the cost but with less features.positive thing is it's native 4k
In current scenario, I'm leaning towards BenQ HT3550 as against Epson tw7100 or BenQ tk850 considering my room dimensions and Epson's throw ratio.That would make Sony 4K nearly 4 lakhs? That's too much!
Epson's pricing is incomparable, especially for us Indian buyers. I guess I will wait for few more months to see how things go.
Both BenQs are good choices. I already have a BenQ 1080p projector (which is great), so leaning towards Epson for next purchase for change.In current scenario, I'm leaning towards BenQ HT3550 as against Epson tw7100 or BenQ tk850 considering my room dimensions and Epson's throw ratio.