It's not the question of playing spoilsport - but getting to the bottom of it. Most of these tests where people can distinguish are usually done sighted or not done blind. If its the controlled blind test, users are not able to distinguish the cables. Or at least I haven't come across such a test resulting in audible difference. Anyone who wants to learn about this needs to read this thread or at least first few pages. http://www.avsforum.com/t/941184/observations-of-a-controlled-cable-test
The gist is - the poster in first post (and he was actually an observer for this test) was able to (or thought he was) hear the difference in cables but when he went blind, he couldn't. Just clear enough to tell that how easy it is to trick the mind.
Another thing is - all the cable manufacturer's who claim the cables make a difference can never back it up, never publish a paper in Engineering societies like AES or take patents. If their design indeed makes a difference, then why not patent it? Cause most likely they can't prove it.
To borrow our young, dynamic, upcoming leader's quotation and put into audio theory, "Audible cable difference is a state of mind"
The gist is - the poster in first post (and he was actually an observer for this test) was able to (or thought he was) hear the difference in cables but when he went blind, he couldn't. Just clear enough to tell that how easy it is to trick the mind.
Another thing is - all the cable manufacturer's who claim the cables make a difference can never back it up, never publish a paper in Engineering societies like AES or take patents. If their design indeed makes a difference, then why not patent it? Cause most likely they can't prove it.
To borrow our young, dynamic, upcoming leader's quotation and put into audio theory, "Audible cable difference is a state of mind"
