jamo C605/ C607

Status
Not open for further replies.
long time since ive seen so much angst in a thread NOT involving cables :D
speakers are so different sounding that it is natural to "agree to disagree" especially if you bring the ancilliary equipment and room/setup into play...
 
I have a strong suspicion that maladjusted is nmytree by another name, or one of his cohorts from one of the other forums, recruited by him to provide some support that he was fast losing on account of his rudeness..

Oh, so now you're making accusations and implying dishonest, duplicitous behavior on my part. Should I be offended? :lol:

Should I seek an attorney?:rolleyes:

Hmmm....practing what one preache is not exactly a strong suit around these parts.

BTW, the Moderators/Facilitators can confirm that we are not the same people. In fact, I did not know maladjusted till he posted in this thread.

I think it's also comical that you can't imagine anyone agreeing with my side of the argument, without some kind of duplicitous behavior.:lol:
 
hey nmytree, i think it's you who's doing the avoiding and spinning in circles, but i'll answer your queries straight.

If that long time member was irresponsible and inaccurate in his comments, it's not discourteous. It simply is what it is. I called him out on what was inaccurate, misleading comments.

Again, irresponsible and inaccurate is not the same as dishonest. You called him a liar and dishonest. What do you have to say to that?

Answer me this. And try not to spin into circles.

Do you actually believe that a long time member, who makes such negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments; without truely having the hands-on experience and thorough knowledge of the subject matter; is being courteous and helpful?

i have no way of verifying whether he truly has hands on experience or not and i am not in a position to judge this. He offerred his opinion. You are free to say that it is inaccurate. You are not free to call him a liar.

Do you honestly believe this long time member has heard every Jamo speaker model, in every Jamo Series; to validate this comment..." The current ones are pretty crappy in just about everything" ????????

Nope, I don't think so. But that's my opinion, I don't know the facts, and I sure as hell have no right to call him a liar.

I ask this. Why are you taking exception to my calling him (and others) out for these misrepresentions and myths, but you ignore the intial negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments being perpetuated; without people who have no legitimate qualifications to make such comments?

It is 'misrepresentation' when someone knows a fact and knowingly represents something contrary to the fact. To state an opinion, however uninformed or ill-founded is not misrepresentation. Even if I concede that the members are not qualified to comment on the speakers, making unqualified comments on speakers is a fairly minor offence compared to calling someone a liar.

Why are you and several others so focused on ignoring the specifics of my repeatidly stated points and counter-arguments, in favor of what you want the argument to be about?

I have absolutely no stakes in this argument. I don't know about these speakers. Haven't heard them. Have no plans to. I do take exception to your rude behaviour and name-calling.

I'll await your responses. Please, no spinning.

As you will observe, i've responded directly to all your queries. No spinning. To reiterate my main point. Saying that you disagree with someone's opinion or that you don't think that person is qualified to opine on something is acceptable. Calling someone a liar and dishonest is not. Have you managed to comprehend this or will I have to post again?
 
Again.....inaccurate, misleading and 'mythical' are not the same as dishonest and lies......lies are deliberately false statements......on what basis are you calling them liars?


Have they heard all of Jamo's speaker series and models?

Do they know, are they aware that they haven't heard all of Jamo's speaker series and models?


If they know they have NOT heard all of Jamo's speaker series and models, yet, they perpetuate negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments. That's the very definition of lying.

Look it up in the dictionary.
 
The truth is a few of you guys have been rude and intentionally provoking myself and now, maladjusted, too; since the beginning.

For the most part we have refrained from getting rude and insulting. For the most part.

Yet, I see no one going after those who have been rude to us. Interesting.
 
OI! psychotropic!

i have this feeling, this special feeling, that you WILL have to post again!:)
 
i don't know what dictionary you read nmytree, but in order for something to be a lie there needs to be intention to mislead/deceive. To "they perpetuate negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments" is NOT the definition of lying. In addition to it you've called them dishonest.

These are personal attacks, and no one has made any personal attacks against you. We can keep arguing this endlessly. I am a lawyer, I love this shit, especially when I'm arguing with someone who's already realised he's wrong and is trying to go round in circles.

To reiterate, to LIE is to INTENTIONALLY mislead. You have absolutely no basis on which to ascertain the intention of the members who you attacked. Therefore you have made an unsubstantiated allegation, which is rude and discourteous to boot. Do you deny this?

And yes, point noted about my comment about you and maladjusted being the same person. Guilty as charged. I will edit my post.

If they know they have NOT heard all of Jamo's speaker series and models, yet, they perpetuate negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments. That's the very definition of lying.

Look it up in the dictionary.
 
HI again boyos:NMYTR..i mean maladjusted here!Well i have a mirror in front of me and it looks like me,HOLY S**T ive gone grey over the last couple of days AH WELL maybe thats my punishment for "cohorting" with malaj...I mean nmytree,....ANYWAY i've just purchased the c605 pack with c60sur & sub650.IF anyone has anything to add or to state i should'nt get these is more than welcome to state their case. NMYTREE has most of the concert series and im sure he likes discussing them too!Suri's brother has some c800 and has discussed them.SUBHASH has what i consider to be one of the coolest set-ups incl. jamo speakers and im pretty sure he would like to discuss with us all any thoughts we have on it-them! And to whoever else has jamo or would like to discuss jamo speakers esp c605/607 series afterall that is what the thread is about.SO MAYBE WE SHOULD START AGAIN IF EVERYBODY AGREES or dump the thread now as it has gotten out of hand.And i include myself in that statement as well.SO HOW ABOUT IT:NO MORE AGRO!! anybody.......:)
 
i have no way of verifying whether he truly has hands on experience or not and i am not in a position to judge this. He offerred his opinion. You are free to say that it is inaccurate. You are not free to call him a liar.

Nope, I don't think so. But that's my opinion, I don't know the facts, and I sure as hell have no right to call him a liar.

It is 'misrepresentation' when someone knows a fact and knowingly represents something contrary to the fact. To state an opinion, however uninformed or ill-founded is not misrepresentation.

Why are you and several others so focused on ignoring the specifics of my repeatidly stated points and counter-arguments, in favor of what you want the argument to be about?


Oh really? You have no way of knowing? Well, how about actually reading his comments in this thread?

This was on page Four:

NMyTree you are entitled to your opinion and so do I. Personally I have had the C605 and C803 on demo for over a week in the same room where I had the E855 which was my previous set of speakers.


This was on pages previous to page Four:


I had a Jamo E855 once upon a time. This was sold to someone in through this forum. My personal experience is that the new C6xx .....


The older D series and the higher end of the E series (E7//E8) were nice musical speakers though not the last word in detail. The current ones are pretty crappy in just about everything. I have an older E855 but I'd not buy any of the newer ones.


So let's see if we can get this straight. Firstly, right in the beginning of this thread, Reighofchoas perpetuates negative, broad, all encompassing generalizational comments aboutn all Jamo's current speaker series and models.

When challenged and pressed for him to qualify and validate his comments.

We find out that Reighofchaos has some limited and brief experience with only and exactly two of Jamo's current speaker models; the C605 and C803.

Does two speaker models equate to all of the Jamo speaker series and models? Oh I think not.

Is Reignofchoas under the impression that he HAS heard all of Jamo's speaker series and models? No, he is not.

He's quite aware of his lack of hands-on experience with them. Reighofcaos knows two models do not equal all of Jamo's series and models. yet, he made the comments. That's lying.

I rest my case.
 
Last edited:
HI again boyos:NMYTR..i mean maladjusted here!Well i have a mirror in front of me and it looks like me,HOLY S**T ive gone grey over the last couple of days AH WELL maybe thats my punishment for "cohorting" with malaj...I mean nmytree,....ANYWAY i've just purchased the c605 pack with c60sur & sub650.IF anyone has anything to add or to state i should'nt get these is more than welcome to state their case. NMYTREE has most of the concert series and im sure he likes discussing them too!Suri's brother has some c800 and has discussed them.SUBHASH has what i consider to be one of the coolest set-ups incl. jamo speakers and im pretty sure he would like to discuss with us all any thoughts we have on it-them! And to whoever else has jamo or would like to discuss jamo speakers esp c605/607 series afterall that is what the thread is about.SO MAYBE WE SHOULD START AGAIN IF EVERYBODY AGREES or dump the thread now as it has gotten out of hand.And i include myself in that statement as well.SO HOW ABOUT IT:NO MORE AGRO!! anybody.......:)

cooool that shud be good :clapping:
 
i don't know what dictionary you read nmytree, but in order for something to be a lie there needs to be intention to mislead/deceive. To "they perpetuate negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments" is NOT the definition of lying. In addition to it you've called them dishonest.

These are personal attacks, and no one has made any personal attacks against you. We can keep arguing this endlessly. I am a lawyer, I love this shit, especially when I'm arguing with someone who's already realised he's wrong and is trying to go round in circles.

To reiterate, to LIE is to INTENTIONALLY mislead. You have absolutely no basis on which to ascertain the intention of the members who you attacked. Therefore you have made an unsubstantiated allegation, which is rude and discourteous to boot. Do you deny this?

And yes, point noted about my comment about you and maladjusted being the same person. Guilty as charged. I will edit my post.
FIRST A MOD NOW HES A LAWYER!!as you've said YOU LOVE THIS S**T,i think your intention is to upset anybody you can, and not even your moderator or lawyer status changes or makes your stand any higher than anybody else here.OBVIOUSLY you didnt like the idea of starting off fresh,you actually think NMYTREE is bothered by your petty idea that you think you have him in a corner sweating! if you have nothing to discuss you should'nt be browbeating others my learned friend!PLEASE ANSWER:What is your reason for posting on this thread?:indifferent14:
 
For a change, how about the following and making life easier and restore some sanity back in these never-ending arguments???

Laws of Acoustics:

Any idiot can design a loudspeaker and, unfortunately, many do.

You can say anything you want, who's to prove you wrong?

The right amount of magnet is the right amount of magnet.

The only transient of significance in the audio business is tranquility. It is also the briefest.

Accuracy of reproduction is determined by how well a sound system models someone's warped set of preconceived notions.

In audio, as elsewhere, foolproof systems prove the existence of fools.

Price buys not performance but paranoia.

The most outspoken experts on concert hall sonic reality have seldom, if ever, been to a concert.

The more money spent on an audiophile system, the less time spent listening to music.

And the favorite: In a minimum phase system there is an inextricable link between frequency response, phase response, and transient response, as they are all merely transforms of one another. This, combined with minimalization of open-loop errors in output amplifiers and correct compensation for nonlinear passive crossover network loading, can lead to a significant decrease in system resolution lost. However, this all means nothing when you listen to Pink Floyd.

The author concludes with a Final Truth: The audio business is no place for reasonable people to make a living.

Cheer up, everybody.
regards.
murali
 
HI again boyos:NMYTR..i mean maladjusted here!Well i have a mirror in front of me and it looks like me,HOLY S**T ive gone grey over the last couple of days AH WELL maybe thats my punishment for "cohorting" with malaj...I mean nmytree,....ANYWAY i've just purchased the c605 pack with c60sur & sub650.IF anyone has anything to add or to state i should'nt get these is more than welcome to state their case. NMYTREE has most of the concert series and im sure he likes discussing them too!Suri's brother has some c800 and has discussed them.SUBHASH has what i consider to be one of the coolest set-ups incl. jamo speakers and im pretty sure he would like to discuss with us all any thoughts we have on it-them! And to whoever else has jamo or would like to discuss jamo speakers esp c605/607 series afterall that is what the thread is about.SO MAYBE WE SHOULD START AGAIN IF EVERYBODY AGREES or dump the thread now as it has gotten out of hand.And i include myself in that statement as well.SO HOW ABOUT IT:NO MORE AGRO!! anybody.......:)

hi maladjusted,

really enjoyed reading that!:)

yeah, like you say - Kill this thread - it is leading nowhere - for genteel evil people!!:)

and you know what, maladjusted? - i have been dreaming of this forum/thread where the mods will let us have free reign - a sort of a profanity thread where all the participants let loose without rancour? - give in to our base instincts and insult the other willing participant? - should be good fun!:)

but this thread - somehow, the joie de vivre has gone, the conversation has become desultory, and now my only interest is seeing if maladjusted or psychotropic has posted sumthin to excite my jaded senses!

regds,
suri

edit - NMyTree - note the intent.
 
Last edited:
i don't know what dictionary you read nmytree, but in order for something to be a lie there needs to be intention to mislead/deceive. To "they perpetuate negative broad, all encompassing generalizational comments" is NOT the definition of lying. In addition to it you've called them dishonest.

These are personal attacks, and no one has made any personal attacks against you. We can keep arguing this endlessly. I am a lawyer, I love this shit, especially when I'm arguing with someone who's already realised he's wrong and is trying to go round in circles.

To reiterate, to LIE is to INTENTIONALLY mislead. You have absolutely no basis on which to ascertain the intention of the members who you attacked. Therefore you have made an unsubstantiated allegation, which is rude and discourteous to boot. Do you deny this?

And yes, point noted about my comment about you and maladjusted being the same person. Guilty as charged. I will edit my post.

Actually, there have been several personal attacks against me. But you don't see me crying about it. They are irrelevent.

The only one spinning in circles, is you...the attorney.

My responses are straight ahead and factual.

I understand that your only recourse is to try and characterize me as desperate and panicy; because the facts I have presenhtesd clearly work in my favor and trump the claims you are making. But try to retain some slither of integrity, here.
 
that shud be good :clapping:
SUB,did you convert rooms in your house or did you add on the theatre?how many seats?I'L be starting to do a bit in my house later,nothing like yours but things like hanging my tv over fireplace,which gives me more freedom for positioning my speakers.I'L be adding ambient lighting & some of those movie miniposters also some plaques!its only 20mtrs sq. but i cant wait:yahoo:
 
"slither of integrity" ? :D what language is that? how exactly does integrity slither?

I don't see either you or maladjusted getting factual at all! Where is your straight ahead and factual response to my question:

"Do you understand that it is different to make a mis-statement and to lie?"

next question

"do you understand that while it is acceptable to tell someone you disagree, or you don't think their statements are correct, it is not acceptable to call them a liar or dishonest?"

straight, factual answers please (preferably yes/no).

and maladjusted, my interest in this thread is that I am a regular on this site, and as I mentioned earlier, one of the moderators. I like to see this site remain clean and useful to people reading it. I don't like rude or offensive behaviour and that's my only interest on this thread. Capiche?

Actually, there have been several personal attacks against me. But you don't see me crying about it. They are irrelevent.

The only one spinning in circles, is you...the attorney.

My responses are straight ahead and factual.

I understand that your only recourse is to try and characterize me as desperate and panicy; because the facts I have presenhtesd clearly work in my favor and trump the claims you are making. But try to retain some slither of integrity, here.
 
HI again boyos:NMYTR..i mean maladjusted here!Well i have a mirror in front of me and it looks like me,HOLY S**T ive gone grey over the last couple of days AH WELL maybe thats my punishment for "cohorting" with malaj...I mean nmytree,....ANYWAY i've just purchased the c605 pack with c60sur & sub650.IF anyone has anything to add or to state i should'nt get these is more than welcome to state their case. NMYTREE has most of the concert series and im sure he likes discussing them too!Suri's brother has some c800 and has discussed them.SUBHASH has what i consider to be one of the coolest set-ups incl. jamo speakers and im pretty sure he would like to discuss with us all any thoughts we have on it-them! And to whoever else has jamo or would like to discuss jamo speakers esp c605/607 series afterall that is what the thread is about.SO MAYBE WE SHOULD START AGAIN IF EVERYBODY AGREES or dump the thread now as it has gotten out of hand.And i include myself in that statement as well.SO HOW ABOUT IT:NO MORE AGRO!! anybody.......:)

I don't think this thread should be dumped. I see no reason for it.

There's plenty of information in here that is helpful. Unfortuntely, the firs eight posts of this thread are about as useless and inaccurate as it gets.

As well as several posts sprinkled through out the thread. But even those useless posts, are a lesson in being cautious of people's generalizations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
For excellent sound that won't break the bank, the 5 Star Award Winning Wharfedale Diamond 12.1 Bookshelf Speakers is the one to consider!
Back
Top