Hi jls001,
It's not that I am against Class D amplifiers. In the above query class D and class AB were compared on sound quality. And if you compare a discrete class AB vs a class D chip, the former will win in every aspect except efficiency. I talk about logical and scientific facts only rather than subjective opinions and I am crude on it.
I haven't done a comparison of my TPA3118 (with various mods) against a class AB AVR receiver but have had the opportunity to compare it to MyRef Rev C (LM3886 chip based design by Mauro Penasa and Linuxguru), a 50W A/AB Yaqin EL34 tube amp, a friend's 180W class AB power amp, and my own (factory made, not a DIY effort) 80W class A amp. That's a fairly varied range of amplifiers. It was very close to the performance of the class A and the 180W AB. The other two instances were a walkover by the TPA3118. Almost no contest, really.
I liked the TPA 3118 a lot after I completed building and modifying it, but never expected it to sound so good. I did it as a fun, cheap, little project out of curiosity aroused by the long thread over at diyaudio. I was taken by (a very pleasant) surprise. No, AB doesn't win every aspect except efficiency. If one goes by the spec sheet of the 3116/3118, it is but natural to expect them to sound rubbish (10% THD at full power) but the reality is no one pushes these amps to full power or near full power constantly. At regular listening levels they play comfortably in their linear range. And within the linear range, there is absolutely no digital glare or etch or audible distortions. Of course I can't speak for other class D chips since I've not heard them.
Now, if we talk about class D, of course it is the future of amplification and sound reproduction. but, factually class D chips have to improve a lot to near linear amplifiers on sound quality-This is what Mr. Douglas Self says.
And ask any amplifier designer or a music creater, (not a music listener) what they use for recording music.
Yes, considering the amount of interest evinced by class D, implementations will surely improve.
Summing up all, I would say that Class D is the future. I am for it. But class D chips should stay where they belong. i.e Boomboxes.
I think many of the class D chips like STA516 were primarily designed for PA but have been embraced by the hifi community for their surprisingly good sonics. TPA 3116/3118/3130 datasheet does list the following applications:
Mini-Micro Component, Speaker Bar, Docks
After-Market Automotive
CRT TV
Consumer Audio Applications
I think they're being conservative and polite in mentioning the last one

I say they will compete very well with many of the entry and mid level hifi brands. But the caveat is there are hardly boxed-up, ready to be plugged in offerings except perhaps from Alibaba/AliExpress. It's heartening to see a class D offering now made available in our own Hifimart. I hope to hear it for myself someday soon.
BTW, i am also designing a discrete Class D amplifier
That's fantastic, Aniket!
Hopefully I'll be able to buy a board/kit from you when you're done.
What kind of modulation scheme and switching frequency are you planning?